Find a nursing home

Home / New York / Far Rockaway

Bezalel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

29 38 Far Rockaway Boulevard, Far Rockaway, NY 11691 · Queens County · (718) 471-2600

120 certified beds, about 116 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1983

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335666 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 24, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).

None of its 13 health citations since March 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.28 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.

22.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
5D
3E
4F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
March 24, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. F
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    F801 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 18, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure that they employed a qualified staff member to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition. This was identified during the kitchen task. Specifically, the current Director of Food Service did not meet the minimum qualifications of being a certified dietary manager or similar national certification for food service management and safety. The finding is: A review of the Facility Assessment documented the services of a Registered Dietitian as part-time, three days per week. The facility appointed Employee #11 as the Food Service Director. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 03/18/2026 at 09:45 AM, Employee #11 stated that they were the Acting Food Service Director as the previous Food Service Director had resigned a few months earlier and they were just temporarily supervising the kitchen. [...]
  2. E
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 18, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident with pressure ulcers received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for three (Resident #34, #1, and #79) of three (3) residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, 1) Resident #34 had an air mattress to help heal pressure ulcers. The resident weighed 201 pounds; however, the air mattress weight setting was set at 450 pounds; 2) Resident #1 utilized an air mattress due to pressure ulcer to the sacrum. The air mattress weight setting for Resident #1was not set consistent with the resident's actual weight. [...]
  3. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 18, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received preadmission screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #21) of 23 residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review. Specifically, Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an incomplete Preadmission Screening and Resident Review form. Items 22 through 26 of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review form dated were not completed prior to admission. Response to Items 22 through 26 would determine if a Level II evaluation was required. [...]
  4. D
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 18, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure that for each pharmacist medication regimen review, the Physician documented in the medical record that the identified irregularity has been reviewed, and what, if any, action has been taken to address it; and if there is to be no change in medication, the Physician documented regarding the rationale for not changing the medication. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #10) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, a pharmacy medication regimen review for Resident #10 dated 01/29/2026 recommended changing the medication oxybutynin (treats overactive bladder) to a different medication that causes less side effects. The disagree box was checked on the medication regimen review form; [...]
March 21, 2024Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. B
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 03/14/2024 to 03/21/2024, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessments were transmitted within 14 days of completion. This was evident for 1 (Resident #88) of 2 residents reviewed for resident assessment out of 24 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #88's Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessments were not transmitted within 14 days of the completion date.
March 20, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00309677 and NY00307950), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect,were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that the results of all investigations were reported to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident. This was evident in 3 of 3 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3) sampled for abuse. Specifically, 1.) On 01/30/2023 at approximately 4:30 am, Resident #2 was observed kissing and inappropriately touching Resident #1. An initial report was made to the New York State Department of Health on 01/30/2023 at 3:12 pm. The facility did not submit a Follow-up Investigation Report within 5 working days of the incident. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews and record review during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00307950), the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement. This was evident in 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) sampled for elopement. Specifically, on 01/01/2023, Resident #3, who was severely cognitively impaired and had a wander alert device in place, left the building undetected through the front door at 3:55 pm. Resident #3 was located by the Registered Nurse Supervisor on 01/01/2023 at approximately 8:13 pm with family members walking towards the emergency room in close proximity to the facility.
March 15, 2022Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview conducted during the Recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety to prevent foodborne illness. Specifically, 1) nutrition supplements/paper goods storage room was not maintained in a clean sanitary manner, and 2) staff did not change contaminated gloves after disposing garbage. This was observed during the Kitchen facility task.
  2. F
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey conducted from 3/8/22 to 3/15/22, the facility did not ensure that garbage and refuse were disposed of properly. Specifically, garbage dumpsters located outside adjacent to the parking lot were observed to be uncovered, overflowing with garbage and the area surrounding was scattered with debris and trash. This was observed during the Kitchen task.
  3. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the Recertification/Complaint survey, the facility did not ensure that infection prevention control practices were followed to help prevent the spread, development, and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility did not have (1) a facility-specific water management plan for Legionella with mandatory components including but not limited to: a description of the facility's water distribution system; temperature profile of the water system; control measures and actions to be taken if control measures not met; or (2) a sampling plan for the potable water system. In addition, the facility (3) environmental risk assessment was not reviewed within the last year, as required. This was evident for the Water Management Plan review for Infection Control.
  4. E
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, during the Recertification survey conducted from 03/08/2022- 03/15/2022, the facility did not ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment(s) were electronically transmitted to the CMS (Centers of Medicare/Medicaid Services) Data System within 14 days after assessments were completed. This was evident for 11 of 29 residents reviewed for MDS Discrepancy. (Residents: #30, #3, #4, #15, #19, #14, # 24, #20, #22, #21, #25).
  5. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey conducted from 3/08/2022 to 3/15/2022, the facility did not ensure, to the extent practicable, that residents/resident representatives participated in the development of a Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP). Specifically, cognitively intact residents were not afforded the opportunity to participate in the care plan meetings. This was evident for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for Care Plan out of a sample of 25 residents. (Resident #111 and #107)
  6. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews conducted during a Recertification survey from 03/08/2022 to 03/15/2022, the facility did not ensure that controlled drugs were stored appropriately in locked compartments. Specifically, 1) two blister packets containing controlled drugs were observed stored in the refrigerator in the medication room and were not double locked, and 2) one bottle of controlled substance was observed stored in a removable double locked box locked in the refrigerator. This was observed on 2 of 3 units during the Medication Storage Task. (Units 2 and 4)

Fire safety inspections

11 fire safety citations on file: 1 on March 24, 2026, 2 on March 21, 2024, 8 on March 15, 2022.

Every fire safety citation11 citations
  1. E
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · March 24, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · March 21, 2024 · fire safety evaluation s
  3. E
    Have proper power supply for life support equipment.
    K 915 · March 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · March 15, 2022 · Waiver
  5. E
    Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.
    K 911 · March 15, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Have proper power supply for life support equipment.
    K 915 · March 15, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · March 15, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · March 15, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Have stairways and smokeproof enclosures used as exits that meet safety requirements.
    K 225 · March 15, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. D
    Have exits that are accessible at all times.
    K 271 · March 15, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. D
    Install proper backup exit lighting.
    K 281 · March 15, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNew YorkUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.283.633.86
Registered nurses0.500.710.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.043.183.42
Nurse aides2.29
Licensed practical nurses0.50
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)22.4%40.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover31.6%39.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.97 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.38 on weekdays and 3.04 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.20 in April to June 2025 to 3.28 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.280.503.383.04 5.1%0 of 90116
Oct to Dec 20253.340.563.453.05 4.8%0 of 92113
Jul to Sep 20253.240.573.342.97 7.3%0 of 92114
Apr to Jun 20253.200.573.322.89 7.9%0 of 91115
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
New York, Jan to Mar 20263.550.683.723.139.8%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNew YorkUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.114.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.30.50.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.51.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.33.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.61.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.512.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.96.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
11.813.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
23.220.623.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
10.59.612.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.71.71.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.31.41.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BEZALEL NURSING HOME COMPANY.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Basch, JoshuaW-2 managing employeeIndividual10/01/2013
Gordon, NossonW-2 managing employeeIndividual10/13/2015
Light, CharlesW-2 managing employeeIndividual08/03/2015
Basch, JackCorporate directorIndividual01/19/1995
Gordon, NossonCorporate directorIndividual10/13/2015
Inzlicht, MikeCorporate directorIndividual01/19/1995
Kraus, YossiCorporate directorIndividual07/15/2013
Basch, JoshuaOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2013
Light, CharlesOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/03/2015

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 24, 2026: "PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities"
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 24, 2026: "Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 24, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 24, 2026: "Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.04 hours per resident per day, below the New York average of 3.18.

Other nursing homes nearby

New York contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Bezalel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Bezalel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Bezalel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 24, 2026. The New York average is 8.1.
Has Bezalel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Bezalel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Bezalel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center?
CMS lists 9 owners and managers. Legal business name: BEZALEL NURSING HOME COMPANY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection