Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Hughes Springs

Capstone Healthcare of Hughes Springs

215 Fm 161 Business South, Hughes Springs, TX 75656 · Cass County · (903) 639-2561

69 certified beds, about 41 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2007

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676154 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 3, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 26 health citations since March 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.16 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.56 of those hours.

47.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
14D
10E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 3, 2026Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 4, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen (1 of 1 kitchen) reviewed for food safety requirements. 1. The facility failed to ensure the food mixer was free of a blackish/grey dried substance on the [NAME] head on 06/01/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure the toaster oven was free of a thick, sticky layer of brown, black and yellow crumbs on 06/01/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure the plates and trays were appropriately dried before storing on 06/01/2026. 4. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was free of an orange liquid substance on the interior portion of the top of the cooler on 06/01/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and food contamination.
  2. D
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 4, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs and residents who used psychotropic drugs received gradual dose reductions, and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these drugs; and PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #8 and Resident #26) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic drugs. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 did not have a PRN order for lorazepam 0.5 mg (a prescription medication used to treat anxiety disorders: feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness) after 14 days without an evaluation by the physician for continued treatment with a rationale in the resident's medical record. 2. [...]
  3. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 4, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #26) reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to complete an HHSC 1012 form and submit a new PASRR Level 1 form to the local health authority, when Resident #26 received a new diagnosis of major depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest in activities, and an inability to function normally) on 10/06/25. This failure could place residents at risk for their specialized services not being provided in a timely manner.
  4. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 4, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #12 and Resident #36) reviewed for PASRR Level I screenings. 1. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASRR Level 1 screening for Resident #12. The PASRR Level 1 screening did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnosis (schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type) was present upon Resident #12's admission date on 09/22/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASRR Level 1 screening for Resident #36. The PASRR Level 1 screening did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnosis (major depressive disorder) was present upon Resident #36's admission date on 09/01/24. [...]
  5. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 4, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #16) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's refusal to wear her splint for contracture management was included in the comprehensive care plan. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and a decreased quality of life.
  6. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 4, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with State and Federal laws, that all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 of 18 residents (Resident #12 and Resident #36) reviewed for storage of medication. 1. The facility failed to securely store Resident #12's dermal wound cleanser on 06/01/26. 2. The facility failed to securely store Resident #36's stomach relief medication (bismuth subsalicylate 525 mg) on 06/01/26, 06/02/26, and 06/03/26. These failures could place residents at risk for adverse reactions to medications or overdose.
  7. D
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 4, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure menus met the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines for 1 of 2 meal (the lunch meal) reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] F followed the recipe for pureeing the rice pilaf on 06/02/26 for the lunch meal. This failure could place residents at risk for weight loss, not having their nutritional needs met, and a decreased quality of life.
February 18, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 19, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 1 of 1 facility, 1 of 1 dining room and 7 of 7 residents reviewed for environment. (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6)The facility failed to repair a leaking roof and ensure ceiling tiles were in good repair in the dining room, the area in front of the ice machine leading into the dining room, the rooms for Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #7. This failure placed residents at risk of an uncomfortable environment and a decrease in quality of life and self-worth. During an observation on 02/18/26 at 9:35 a.m., in the far back right corner of the dining room above a metal cabinet there were 2 bulging ceiling tiles. [...]
April 2, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services and interventions to be used to attain and maintain the resident's practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 22 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #8, Resident #29, and Resident #41). 1. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #29's depression and impaired coping with interventions following aggressive behaviors (scratched roommate on face) on 2/21/2025 and calling the police telling them he was being held hostage at gunpoint on 3/18/2025. 2. [...]
  2. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 10 of 10 residents in a confidential group meeting (Anonymous Resident (AR)1-Anonymous Resident (AR) 10), and 1 of 1 meal (Lunch meal) reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure on 4/1/25, AR 1through AR 10 were not served hard, burnt dinner rolls at the noon lunch meal. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life.
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 15 residents (Residents #7 and Resident #41) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA D performed hand hygiene and changed gloves appropriately prior to, during, and after providing incontinent care/indwelling urinary catheter care to Resident #7. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA D did not contaminate Resident #7's clothing, clean brief, bed, bedding, bed remote, positioning wedge, and urinary catheter bag after CNA D had performed bowel incontinent care and incontinent/urinary catheter care. 3. [...]
  4. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview , the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 15 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #31) The facility failed to treat Resident #31 with dignity and respect by CNA F denying his request to have food brought by his family reheated on 02/12/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, decreased self-esteem and increased anxiety.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with urinary incontinence, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #7) reviewed for urinary catheters. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA D performed hand hygiene and changed gloves appropriately during and after providing incontinent care to Resident #7. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA D performed hand hygiene and changed gloves appropriately prior to providing indwelling urinary catheter care to Resident #7. These failures could place residents at an increased risk for urinary tract infections.
  6. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 1 medication storage room (medication storage room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Zinc 50mg was not expired in medication storage room [ROOM NUMBER]. The unopened bottle of Zinc expiration date was 3/2025. The facility failed to ensure Acetaminophen Suppositories 650mg were not expired in the medication storage room [ROOM NUMBER]'s medication refrigerator. The suppositories expiration date was 12/10/24. [...]
January 28, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 4 of 42 residents (Resident #1, #2, #4, and #5) reviewed for resident abuse. The facility did not ensure Resident (Resident #1, #2, #4, and #5) were free from abuse. This failure could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, or emotional distress.
March 20, 2024Standard inspection · 10 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements. The facility failed to ensure the ceiling was in good repair in the kitchen. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and food contamination.
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 5 of 13 residents (Resident #31, Resident #18, Resident #38, Resident #33, and Resident #30) reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31 had a dignified existence by allowing her to use the working bathroom commode in her room. 2. The facility failed to ask Resident #18 to remove a food item from her plate prior to reaching into her plate during her lunch meal. 3. The facility failed to provide Resident #38 with a knife to cut his meat during meals. 4. The facility failed to provide Resident #33 with a requested knife to his cut meat during the lunch meals on 03/18/2024 and 03/19/2024. 5. [...]
  3. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environment 4 of 15 residents reviewed for environment. (Resident #1, Resident #41, Resident #29, and Resident #31) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #29, and Resident #41's bedroom ceiling tiles did not have brown water stains. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31 was allowed to use the working commode in her room. These failures could place residents at risk of an unsafe, unsanitary, uncomfortable environment, embarrassment due to room not appearing homelike, and a decrease in quality of life and self-worth.
  4. E
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis service were provided consistently with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis services. (Resident #11) The facility failed to document vital signs and an assessment of the access site after Resident #11 returned from dialysis. This failure could place residents who received dialysis at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs.
  5. E
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each residents' drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (without adequate behavior monitoring) for 4 (Resident # 2, Resident # 11, Resident # 16, and Resident # 41) of 13 residents whose medications were reviewed in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had behavior monitoring for his prescribed Zoloft (is an antidepressant used to treat major depression). 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 had behavior monitoring for his prescribed Lexapro (is an antidepressant used to treat depression). 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 had behavior monitoring for his prescribed Ativan (is used to treat anxiety), Buspirone (is used to treat anxiety disorders) and Lexapro (is an antidepressant used to treat depression). 4. [...]
  6. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were secured properly for one of four nurse medication carts (Hall 100 nurse medication cart). 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN D did not leave 2 Insulin pens on top of nursing cart unsupervised. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN D's medication cart was not left unlocked and supervised. These deficient practices placed residents at risk of drug diversion and having access to medications not prescribed for them which could result in injury and hospitalization.
  7. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the status for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for assessments. (Resident #1) The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's MDS assessment did not improperly code Cilostazol (in a class of medications called platelet-aggregation inhibitors (antiplatelet medications)) as an anticoagulant instead of an antiplatelet. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met.
  8. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals with mental health disorders were provided an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Screening for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for resident assessments. The facility failed to review Resident #2's PASRR level 1 assessment for accuracy. Resident #2 was diagnosed with Bipolar, and the mental health question was answered no. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed assessments (PASRR Evaluation), individualized care, and specialized services to meet their needs.
  9. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's person-centered comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 2 of 13 residents (Residents #1 and Resident #11) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to revise and update Resident #1's comprehensive care plan for the type of blood thinner, Cilostazol (is in a class of medications called platelet-aggregation inhibitors (antiplatelet medications)), he was prescribed instead of Plavix (is an antiplatelet drug you can take to prevent blood clots) and Eliquis (is a blood thinner medicine that reduces blood clotting.). 2. The facility failed to revise and update Resident #11's comprehensive care plan for his diet, fluid restriction, and increase protein need for dialysis. [...]
  10. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control during wound care. (Resident #1) The facility failed to ensure WCN practiced infection control measures by using hand gel or washing hands after the removal of gloves. This failure could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and at an increased risk of infection.
March 5, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for- residents rights. (Resident #5) The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was provided privacy when she used a bedside commode in her room. This failure placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and decrease in comfort.

Fire safety inspections

5 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 3, 2026, 3 on April 2, 2025, 1 on March 20, 2024.

Every fire safety citation5 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · June 3, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · April 2, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · April 2, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · April 2, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · March 20, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.163.393.86
Registered nurses0.560.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.262.983.42
Nurse aides2.92
Licensed practical nurses0.67
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)47.1%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.80 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.52 on weekdays and 3.26 on weekends, 28% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.10 in April to June 2025 to 4.16 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.160.564.523.26 8.3%0 of 9041
Oct to Dec 20254.240.514.613.32 0.0%0 of 9241
Jul to Sep 20254.180.494.583.15 0.2%0 of 9243
Apr to Jun 20254.100.484.463.19 0.0%0 of 9142
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
29.915.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.00.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.33.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
36.914.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.63.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.09.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
26.725.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
19.612.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.72.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.42.11.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Sanderson, ClarkCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2024
Capstone-Hughes Springs Opco, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization10/01/2024
Moman, MatthewOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2024
Capstone-Hughe Springs Propco LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization07/17/2025
Mme Capital Holdings, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization07/17/2025
Lytle, JayAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2024
Shen, Hong-IAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on June 3, 2026: "Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on February 18, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 3, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 3, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Capstone Healthcare of Hughes Springs's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Capstone Healthcare of Hughes Springs 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Capstone Healthcare of Hughes Springs get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 3, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Capstone Healthcare of Hughes Springs been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Capstone Healthcare of Hughes Springs accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Capstone Healthcare of Hughes Springs?
CMS lists 7 owners and managers. Legal business name: FANNIN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection