Champlain Valley Physicians Hosp Med Ctr S N F
75 Beekman Street, Plattsburgh, NY 12901 · Clinton County · (518) 562-7760
95 certified beds, about 35 residents a day · Non profit - Other · Medicare and Medicaid since 1975
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335442 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 17, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 17 health citations since December 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.29 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.22 of those hours.
CMS links it to University of Vermont Health Network, an affiliated group of 3 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.
January 17, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- D Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not provide proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain the vision ability for 1 (Resident #28) of 2 residents reviewed for communication. Specifically, Resident #28, who had impaired vision was not assisted in obtaining optometry consultation to be evaluated for vision aids. This is evidenced by: Resident #28 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a long-term breathing problem), hypertension (high blood pressure), and dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life). The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 11/10/2024, documented the resident was understood, able to understand others, and was cognitively intact. [...]
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, cleaning chemicals were not stored properly, equipment was not in good repair or installed safely, equipment and floors were not clean, and the proper testing equipment was not available for checking the concentration of sanitizing solution. This is evidenced by: During observations on 01/13/2025 at 12:29 PM, the following was noted: • Glass cleaner was stored above food processor. • The warewashing area spay hose nozzle was hanging below the sink flood rim in water. • The facility did not have correct test papers to check the sanitizing solution; [...]
- E Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #s NY00346121, NY00366317, and NY00365618), the facility did not ensure the resident's right to be free from abuse and neglect for 3 (Resident #s 1, 14, and 23) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Specifically, (a.) for Resident #1, a staff member grabbed their forearm and removed their call light on 6/23/2024; (b.) for Resident #14, a bed bolster was not in place when one staff member assisted in the resident's care when the resident required two staff, resulting in a fall on 12/22/2024; (c.) for Resident #23, a staff member grabbed their hand resulting in a skin tear. This is evidenced by: [...]
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00366317), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse, to the Administrator of the facility and to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #23) of 4 residents reviewed. Specifically, an allegation of physical abuse observed by staff on 12/25/2024 at 2:00 AM was not reported to the New York State Department of Health within 2 hours after the allegation was made. The allegation was reported to the New York State Department of Health on 12/26/2024 at 3:19 PM. This is evidenced by: [...]
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00366317), the facility did not ensure the resident's right to be free from further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment while an investigation was in progress for 1 (Resident #23) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aide #3 was not removed immediately from resident's care when there was an allegation of physical abuse to prevent further abuse from occurring. Certified Nurse Aide #3 was allowed to work until the end of their shift. This is evidenced by: The facility policy and procedure titled, Abuse Prevention, Investigation, and Reporting, revised 8/19/2024, documented the facility would actively protect the resident's right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. [...]
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00365618), the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices were provided to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #14) of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards. Specifically, Resident #14, who required 2 caregivers for care was assisted with 1 caregiver and a bed bolster was not in place resulting in the resident rolling out of bed. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of dementia, epilepsy (a neurological disorder marked by sudden recurrent episodes of sensory disturbance, loss of consciousness, or convulsion, associated with abnormal electrical activity in the brain), and major depressive disorder. [...]
July 10, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case #s NY00343699 and NY00318831), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse was reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 (Resident #s 1 and 3) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse reporting. Specifically, allegations of physical and sexual abuse that involved 2 residents was not reported by staff to facility administration within 2 hours. This is evidenced by: [...]
October 14, 2022Standard inspection · 7 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews during the recertification survey dated 10/11/2022 through 10/14/2022, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed or served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Specifically, a toxic vapor-emitting fly strip was found in the dishwashing machine area; brooms and dust bins were stored in the cafeteria preparation area; and the floor mixer, bake shop table mixer, microwave oven, can opener holders, bake shop sugar bin, refrigerator door gaskets, cooking line floor under equipment, floor at entrance to the walk-in freezer, and fire extinguishers were soiled with food particles, food splatters, or a grease build-up. This is evidenced as follows: During main kitchen observations on 07/13/22 at 10:45 AM, a toxic vapor-emitting fly strip was found in the dishwashing machine area; [...]
- E Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey on 10/11/2022 through 10/14/2022 the facility did not ensure that the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies and regularly reviewed, analyzed, and acted on available data to make improvements related to F656; Development and Implementation of Comprehensive Care Plans, and F697; Pain Management. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that the approved Plan of Correction (POC) for F 656, and F 697 cited during the Recertification Survey completed on 12/19/2019 were implemented, resulting in the same deficiencies being issued during the current survey. This is evidenced by: [...]
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification survey dated 10/11/22 through 10/14/2022, the facility did not ensure that residents and/or their designated representative were fully informed of their right to an expedited review of a service termination for one (1) of 3 medical records reviewed. Specifically, Resident #84 received Medicare Part A services and did not provide notification (2-day notification) of the termination of services with the required form Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage, Form CMS 10123-NOMNC. This is evidenced as follows: [...]
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure development of comprehensive person-centered care plans, that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment, for three (Residents #,s 6, 7, and #10) of sixteen residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (CCP). Specifically, for Resident #6, the facility did not ensure a CCP was developed to address the use of oxygen and the use of anticoagulants (blood thinners), for Resident #7, a CCP was not developed to address frequent migraines and for Resident #10, a CCP was not developed to address recent antipsychotic medication. This is evidenced by: Resident #6: [...]
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey dated 10/11/2022 through 10/14/2022, the facility did not ensure that residents in need of respiratory care, received such care consistent with professional standards for 1 (Resident #6) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. Specifically, for Resident #6, the facility did not ensure the resident's medical record included documentation of on-going administration of oxygen and monitoring of the resident's respiratory status. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Oxygen Therapy Protocol for Adults last revised 3/28/22, did not address documentation or on-going monitoring of residents receiving oxygen therapy. Resident #6: Resident #6 was admitted with diagnoses of dementia, atrial fibrillation, and chronic pulmonary embolism. [...]
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during a recertification survey the facility did not ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 (Resident #'s 7 and #287) of 3 residents reviewed for pain management. Specifically, for Residents #'s 7 and #287, the facility did not ensure the resident's pain levels were assessed, did not ensure that non-pharmacological interventions for pain relief were provided and did not ensure that the effectiveness of as needed (PRN) pain medications were monitored. This was evidenced by: [...]
- C Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the recertification survey dated 10/11/2022 through 10/14/2022, the facility did not ensure the policy regarding foods brought to residents is in accordance with adopted regulations. Specifically, the facility does not provide orally and in writing, information for family and other visitors on safe food handling practices or safe reheating of food that is brought to residents. This is evidenced is as follows: The document titled Food Brought By Family/Visitors - SNF and dated 08/2019 documents that safe food handling practices will be explained to family/visitors in a language and format they understand. The facility policy for foods brought in by visitors was reviewed on 12/04/2019. This policy does not include a process to ensure family and other visitors are provided information on safe food handling practices. [...]
December 19, 2019Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteThe facility did not ensure person-centered comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the residents needs for 5 (Resident #'s 6, 17, 23, 33, and #286) of 12 residents reviewed. [...]
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview during a recertification survey the facility did not ensure adequate pain management was provided to a resident who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) (Resident #6) of one (1) residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that circumstances for when pain could be anticipated were identified and communicated, did not ensure the resident's existing pain was routinely evaluated for the management and prevention of pain, and did not ensure the use and administration of an as needed (PRN) medication was adequately monitored for effectiveness with the use of a pain scale per standard of practice. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey the facility did not ensure that it established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #23) of one resident observed for dressing changes. Specifically, for Resident #23, the facility did not ensure infection control measures were maintained during a wound vac dressing change. This is evidenced by: Resident #23: The resident was admitted to the facility with the diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), quadriplegia and pressure ulcer of the sacral region. [...]
Fire safety inspections
15 fire safety citations on file: 6 on January 17, 2025, 5 on October 14, 2022, 4 on December 19, 2019.
Every fire safety citation15 citations
- F Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
- F Address patient/client population and determine types of services needed.
- F Establish staff and initial training requirements.
- F Install proper backup exit lighting.
- E Ensure that personnel concerned with handling of medical gases and cylinders are trained on the risk.
- E Ensure precautions for handling oxygen cylinders and equipment are correctly followed.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Ensure medical gas and vacuum systems have documented maintenance programs.
- E Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- E Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
- E Ensure that personnel concerned with handling of medical gases and cylinders are trained on the risk.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.29 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.22 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.87 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.39 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.69 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.44 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.46 on weekdays and 3.87 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 6.99 in April to June 2025 to 4.29 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.29 | 1.22 | 4.46 | 3.87 | 6.5% | 0 of 90 | 35 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.35 | 1.33 | 4.48 | 4.03 | 5.7% | 0 of 92 | 35 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.19 | 1.00 | 4.36 | 3.73 | 6.3% | 7 of 92 | 36 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 6.99 | 2.15 | 7.26 | 6.34 | 6.4% | 0 of 91 | 24 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.2 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.5 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.4 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.2 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 40.7 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.6 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.9 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: CHAMPLAIN VALLEY PHYSICIANS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER. CMS links this home to University of Vermont Health Network, a group of 3 nursing homes averaging 2.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The University of Vermont Health Network Inc. | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/01/2016 |
| Bourgeois, Linda | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Donoghue, Kelly | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Goerlitz-Coryer, Elizabeth | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Gregory, Richelle | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| McAuliffe, John | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| McCullum, Kevin | Corporate director | Individual | 04/29/2024 | |
| Niles, Graham | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Prather, Monticia | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Recny, Thomas | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Ryan, Molly | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Vicencio, Elizabeth | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2012 | |
| Webber, Richard | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Fesette, Neil | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Kollar, Matej | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Lebeau, Michelle | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Lebeau, Michelle | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| McCullum, Kevin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/29/2024 | |
| Lebeau, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/29/2025 | |
| McCullum, Kevin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/03/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on January 17, 2025: "Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 17, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 17, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 14, 2022: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Meadowbrook Healthcare Plattsburgh, 0.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Plattsburgh Rehabilitation and Nursing Center Plattsburgh, 1.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Clinton Rehabilitation and Nursing Center Plattsburgh, 1.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Elderwood at Burlington Burlington, 16.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 74 citations
- Birchwood Terrace Rehab & Healthcare Burlington, 16.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Premier Rehab and Healthcare at Burlington Burlington, 19.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 35 citations
- The Villa Rehab St. Albans, 20.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Franklin County Rehab Center, LLC St. Albans, 20.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 14 citations
New York contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: New York State Department of Health, Nursing Homes, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: NYS Health Profiles: Nursing Homes, where New York publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Champlain Valley Physicians Hosp Med Ctr S N F's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Champlain Valley Physicians Hosp Med Ctr S N F 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Champlain Valley Physicians Hosp Med Ctr S N F get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 17, 2025. The New York average is 8.1.
- Has Champlain Valley Physicians Hosp Med Ctr S N F been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Champlain Valley Physicians Hosp Med Ctr S N F accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Champlain Valley Physicians Hosp Med Ctr S N F?
- CMS lists 20 owners and managers, and links the home to University of Vermont Health Network. Legal business name: CHAMPLAIN VALLEY PHYSICIANS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.