8 Bushey Boulevard, Plattsburgh, NY 12901 · Clinton County · (518) 563-3261
89 certified beds, about 78 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1976
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 335528 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on October 24, 2024, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the New York average is 8.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 21 health citations since June 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.46 hours per resident per day, against 3.63 across New York and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.76 of those hours.
55.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New York average 40.3%).
CMS links it to Personal Healthcare Management, an affiliated group of 21 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure a Registered Nurse was scheduled for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. Specifically, there was no registered nurse working for 8 consecutive hours on 6/06/2024, 6/23/2024, 7/14/2024, and 9/28/2024. This is evidenced by: Record review of the written working schedules for 6/06/2024, 6/23/2024, 7/14/2024, and 9/28/2024 revealed no registered nurse was scheduled to be in the building that day. The census was 80 at the time of the survey. Record review revealed the facility submitted a letter to the Department on 10/02/2024 with a request to waive this Federal regulatory requirement. The letter read in part: - 'Request for waiver from 8-hour Registered Nurse requirement under 42 Code of Federal Regulations Section 483.35(b). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, or serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, equipment in the main kitchen and 1 of 2 unit kitchenettes were not clean, equipment was not in good repair, and a test kit for checking the concentration of chemical sanitizing solution was not provided. This is evidenced by: All observations were conducted on 10/20/2024 between 12:11 PM and 1:10 PM. The following equipment was soiled with food particles or a dusty oily buildup: • Microwave oven. • Can opener and holder. • Utensil drawers. • Shelving. • Fire extinguishers. • Floor behind the floor fan in dishwashing machine room. • B-wing nourishment station refrigerator door gasket. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case # NY00316460), the facility did not ensure each resident was free from misappropriation of resident property and exploitation for 1 (Resident #78) of 3 residents reviewed. Specifically, former Activities Director # 1 used Resident #78 ' s checkbook to write checks that were deposited into their personal account and a partner ' s account amounting to over $11,000. This is evidenced by: Resident #78 was admitted with the diagnoses of end stage renal disease, non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage, and dementia. The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 2/22/2023, documented the resident could be understood, usually understand others, and had moderate cognitive impairment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure foods brought to residents by family and other visitors was in accordance with adopted regulations. Specifically, expired food brought to residents was not discarded. This is evidenced by: During observations on 10/21/2024 at 1:05 PM, entrees (rice and rice with tofu) labeled as belonging to Resident #13 were dated 10/07/2024. The document posted on the nourishment kitchen refrigerators titled, Resident Food Only, and dated 03/13/2023 stated that food greater than 3-days old was to be discarded. During an interview on 10/20/2024 at 1:06 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 stated that dietary staff was responsible for discarding food brought in for residents that were more than 3-days old. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case #NY00347220), the facility did not ensure each resident had an environment that was as free of accident hazards as was possible to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #20) of 4 residents reviewed for accident hazards. Specifically, when Resident #20 was holding a lit sparkler, the tip fell on their thigh and resulted in a burn. This is evidenced by: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dementia, edema, and asthma. The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 09/25/2024 documented they could be understood, usually understand others, and was cognitively intact. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case #NY00332449), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse, to the Administrator of the facility and to the State Survey Agency for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that an allegation of physical abuse observed by staff on 1/26/2024 at 9:15 PM was reported to the New York State Department of Health within 2 hours after the allegation was made. The allegation was reported to the New York State Department of Health on 1/29/2024 at 10:36 AM. This is evidenced by: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case #NY00332449), the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, immediate and effective measures were put in place to ensure that further potential abuse while an investigation was in progress for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed. Specifically, the administrative staff were not informed and involved as necessary and did not remove the alleged perpetrators from resident care when allegations of abuse were reported by staff on 1/26/2024 at 9:15 PM. This was evidenced by: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Abuse Identification, effective 8/2020, documented all staff members were responsible for reporting indicators of abuse to the supervisor immediately. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case #NY00332449), the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, Resident #1's care plan was not followed resulting in an abuse allegation. Resident #1 was not assessed by a Registered Nurse, the resident's family and physician were notified following the allegation. This was evidenced by: Resident #1: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dementia with behaviors, peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and anxiety. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review during a Recertification survey, the facility did not develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality care for 8 (Resident #'s 12, 16, 32, 70, 74, 272, 322, and 323) of 13 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. Specifically, for Resident #'s 16, 32, 74, and #272, the facility did not ensure a baseline care plan was developed or completed within 48 hours of the resident's admission and for Resident #'s 12, 70, 322 and #323, the facility did not ensure written summaries of the baseline care plans were provided to the resident and/or the resident's representative. This is evidenced by: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview conducted during the Recertification survey and an abbreviated survey (Case #NY00276384), the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of comprehensive person-centered care plans, that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs, for 7 (Residents #'s 12, 31, 57, 70, 73 322, and #323) of 22 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans (CCP). Specifically, for Resident #12, the facility did not ensure a resident specific CCP for behavior/emotion was developed; for Resident #31, did not ensure a CCP was developed to address the resident's respiratory care related to the resident's diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, and asthma; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure the residents and resident representatives were notified in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital in a language they understood for 2 (Resident #'s 57 and 60) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Specifically, for Resident #'s 57 and 60, the facility did not ensure the residents or residents representatives were notified in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital in a language they understood. This is evidenced by: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure written notice of the facility's bed hold policy was provided to the residents and the resident representatives for 2 (Resident #'s 57 and #60) of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. Specifically, for Resident #'s 57 and #60, the facility did not ensure there was documented evidence the residents and the resident representatives received written notice of the facility's bed hold policy when the residents were transferred to the hospital. This was evidenced by: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Policy Regarding Bed Reservations for Temporary Absences not dated, documented a copy of the bed hold notice would be sent with the resident at the time of hospitalization or leave of absence and it would be sent to the responsible party within 1 business day. Resident #57: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview during the recertification survey and an abbreviated survey (Case #NY00277698), the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 2 (Resident #'s 21 and 322) of 4 residents reviewed for ADL's. Specifically, for Resident #21, who was dependant on staff for ADL Care, the facility did not ensure incontinence care was provided in accordance with the resident's care plan on 9/21/2021, did not ensure the resident's hair was brushed daily and did not ensure the resident's fingernails were cleaned and trimmed, and for Resident #322, the facility did not ensure the resident received assistance with shaving. This is evidenced by: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure acceptable parameters of nutrition were maintained for 1 (Resident #32) of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. Specifically, for Resident #32, the facility did not ensure the resident's weight was documented and monitored in accordance with professional standards of practice and meal intakes were adequately documented and monitored. Additionally, the facility did not ensure a nutritional supplement was provided in accordance with professional standards. This is evidenced by: Resident #32: Resident #32 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, and protein-calorie malnutrition. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey the facility did not ensure that its medication error rates were not 5 percent or greater. Specifically, for 25 medication administration opportunities there were 19 errors resulting in a medication error rate of 76%. This is evidenced by: The facility Policy and Procedure titled Administration of Medication-General dated 10/2017, documented Administration of medications will occur utilizing the following eight rights: 1. Right Time; a. assist with administration of medications at the indicated time or within sixty (60) minutes before or sixty (60) minutes after the indicated time. b. Ensure that medications labeled to be taken with food are given at mealtime or with a snack. c. Complete a medication error report if medication is not taken within sixty (60) minute timeframe, 2. Right Resident, 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview during a recertification survey the facility did not ensure Comprehensive Minimum Data Sets (MDSs) were completed subject to the timeframes prescribed by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Specifically, for 6 (Resident #'s 4, 7, 14, 28, 29, and 120) of 6 residents reviewed, the facility did not ensure the resident's initial and periodic Comprehensive MDS assessments were completed within the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) specified timeframes. This is evidenced by: Resident #4: The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of depression, anxiety and hypertension. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented he understands, is understood, and has moderate cognitive impairments. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that required Minimum Data Sets (MDS), which included admissions, annuals, quarterly, and significant change assessments, were completed and transmitted as scheduled to provide specific services to residents and to develop resident specific care plans for residents in their care. This was evidenced by: Refer to tag F636 During record review on 6/3/19 at 1:00 PM, MDS assessments needed to perform comparative screening for 22 sampled residents were not readably available. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during a recertification survey and an abbreviated survey (Complaint #NY00213014), the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, and did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #19) of 1 resident reviewed for accidents and supervision. Specifically, for Resident #19, the facility did not ensure the wander alarm system was audible to facility staff in all locations of the building. Additionally, when the laundry area door and exit door alarm sounded on multiple occasions, the facility did not ensure staff inspected the immediate area around the exit door before resetting the door alarm. This is evidenced by: The undated Elopement Policy documented that any staff hearing a door alarm activated was to respond to the alarm immediately. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure a policy was developed for the monthly medication regimen review (MRR) that included time frames for the different steps in the process and steps the pharmacist must take when he or she identifies an irregularity that requires urgent action to protect the resident. Specifically, the facility did not ensure that time frames were established for the steps in the MRR process. This is evidenced by: The Facility Policy and Procedure titled Medication Regimen Review dated 10/2017, did not address the time frames for the different steps in the process and steps the pharmacist must take when he or she identifies an irregularity that requires urgent action to protect the resident. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure food was prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food was brought to the unit in an open cart with several food item uncovered. Staff proceeded to carry the uncovered food through the hall and serve it to residents. Additionally, food being prepared by a food service worker in the main kitchen was placed on residents dishes with gloves that had been contaminated. This is evidenced as follows: Finding 1 During observation on 6/3/19 at 12:30 PM, on Unit B an open metal cart arrived with 10 trays containing uncovered cake with pink frosting, one tray contained an open container of cottage cheese. The trays sat in the hall while staff prepared to serve the residents in their rooms. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure an Infection Prevention and Control Program was maintained. Specifically, the facility did not ensure a line list, used to track infection trends and clusters, was completed for May 2019 and also did not ensure Infection Control Policy and Procedures were reviewed and/or revised on a yearly basis. This is evidenced by: Finding #1: During an interview on 06/06/19 at 10:16 AM, upon reviewing the line lists for April and May, the Infection Control Coordinator (ICC) stated the May line list had not been completed. The Director of Nursing (DON) had temporarily been assigned as Infection Control Coordinator and had reviewed infection trends of upper respiratory infections and pneumonia in April and May but had not filled out the line list for May. [...]
8 fire safety citations on file: 1 on October 24, 2024, 2 on September 23, 2021, 5 on June 6, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | New York | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.46 | 3.63 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.76 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.86 | 3.18 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.94 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.76 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 55.1% | 40.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 21.4% | 39.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.36 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.71 on weekdays and 2.86 on weekends, 23% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.34 in April to June 2025 to 3.46 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.46 | 0.76 | 3.71 | 2.86 | 3.1% | 0 of 90 | 78 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.48 | 0.78 | 3.74 | 2.83 | 1.7% | 0 of 92 | 81 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.46 | 0.75 | 3.69 | 2.86 | 1.7% | 0 of 92 | 81 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.34 | 0.65 | 3.56 | 2.78 | 2.0% | 0 of 91 | 82 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| New York, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.68 | 3.72 | 3.13 | 9.8% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program for its own hires (state list: NYS DOH Nurse Aide Training Programs (nursing homes), as of October 1, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Plattsburgh Rehabilitation and Nursing Center CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.36 | $21.04 to $24.99 | 87,990 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $32.30 | $29.52 to $37.00 | 39,400 |
| Registered nurses | $52.62 | $45.60 to $62.34 | 205,810 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | New York | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.7 | 14.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.3 | 12.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 6.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.6 | 13.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.1 | 20.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.5 | 9.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Plattsburgh Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (54.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
54.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · New York: 101 better, 157 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 73 eligible stays.
10.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · New York: 12 better, 5 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 88 eligible stays.
6.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · New York: 7 better, 21 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 50 eligible stays.
46.7% this home
Median of homes: New York60.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 60 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: New York0.6% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 92 residents counted.
0.9% this home
Median of homes: New York2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 92 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: New York98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: PRNC OPERATING LLC. CMS links this home to Personal Healthcare Management, a group of 21 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barth, Alexander | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 35% | 05/24/2014 |
| Walden, Yehudah | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 15% | 05/23/2014 |
| Zagelbaum, Ephraim | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 05/23/2014 |
| Barth, Alexander | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Ostrovitsky, Israel | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Shah Sekhon, Sarika | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Vega-Castro, Elena | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Prnc Realty LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/10/2025 | |
| Barth, Alexander | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Ostrovitsky, Israel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2016 | |
| Shah Sekhon, Sarika | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/10/2025 | |
| Vega-Castro, Elena | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2016 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its New York inspection record.
These are the official offices in New York. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.