Find a nursing home

Home / Iowa / Chariton

Chariton Specialty Care

1214 North Seventh Street, Chariton, IA 50049 · Lucas County · (641) 774-5921

60 certified beds, about 34 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 165305 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 14, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Iowa average is 6.5, the national average 9.2).

Of 18 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.81 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Iowa and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.99 of those hours.

58.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Iowa average 44.0%).

CMS links it to Care Initiatives, an affiliated group of 43 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
12D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
January 14, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, provider interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders while administering medications through a feeding tube for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #38). The facility reported a census of 33 residents.
  2. D
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    F676 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided therapy prescribed restorative nursing services to maintain a resident's ability to walk and transfer for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #20). The facility reported a census of 33.
September 18, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, food temperatures during food service and resident interview, the facility failed to serve food at an acceptable temperature during one of three meals sampled. The facility reported census was 40.
January 30, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a personalized Care Plan for 4 of 12 residents (#2, #7, #16, and #24) reviewed for Care Plans. The facility reported a census of 32 residents.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, guidance from the 2022 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, and facility policy review, the facility failed to use proper sanitation and glove use during lunch service. The facility reported a census of 32 residents.
  3. D
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and instructions of CMS form 10123-NOMNC, the facility failed to appropriately provide a Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) to 2 of 3 (Resident #35 and #36) residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. The facility reported a census of 32 residents.
  4. D
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, guidance from the 2024 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments following a significant change within federal guidelines for 1 of 5 residents (Res #4) reviewed for significant change. The facility reported a census of 32 residents.
  5. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #7) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 32 residents.
  6. D
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, facility menu review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow the posted menu and serve the appropriate portions for 3 of 3 residents who received pureed diets (Resident #9, #23, #29).
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices to prevent urinary tract infection (UTI) for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #26 and #21) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 32.
March 7, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to follow practices of safe food handling during 2 of 2 meals observed. The facility reported a census of 71 residents.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews and the facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, free from possible hazards, and homelike environment. The facility reported a census of 71 residents.
  3. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure one of one allegation of abuse was reported to the appropriate State Agency (SA). Resident #2 reported an allegation that Staff D, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) was rough with Resident #21 during cares. Staff interviews confirmed the facility Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of Resident #2's allegation involving Staff D, CNA with no evidence the allegation was reported to the SA. Staff D remained actively working with access to all residents. The facility reported a census of 42 residents.
  4. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to prevent further potential abuse by failing to separate the alleged perpetrator from the alleged victim pending an investigation of an abuse allegation. Resident #2 reported an allegation that Staff D, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) was rough with Resident #21 during cares. Staff interviews confirmed the facility Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of Resident #2's allegation involving Staff D, CNA with no evidence the alleged perpetrator was immediately separated from the alleged victim pending the allegation investigation. Staff D remained actively working with access to all residents. The facility reported a census of 42 residents.
  5. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 12 residents reviewed (#20 & #21). The facility reported a census of 42 residents.
September 14, 2023Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. J
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, physician, family and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide necessary assessment, treatment, and services to promote healing of skin injuries, prevent infection, and prevent additional skin damage. The facility failed to implement appropriate interventions with follow-up measures for wound care and physician notification. The facility failed to seek a higher level of care to provide treatment for the wounds that failed to heal. Resident #1 obtained a puncture to the left posterior calf identified on 6/1/23, progressed to a large venous ulceration that became infected with bacteria with purulent green drainage and a strong odor and the right lower leg wound became infected with bacteria as well. [...]
  2. E
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, employee record review, and facility internal investigation notes, the facility failed to employ competant nursing staff to care for the residents. The facility reported a census of 42.
  3. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care to 3 out of 3 residents reviewe, (Resident #6, #9 and #10). The facility was not providing oral hygiene for residents. The facility reported a census of 42 residents.

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeIowaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.813.823.86
Registered nurses0.990.740.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.323.373.42
Nurse aides2.21
Licensed practical nurses0.61
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)58.1%44.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover50.0%42.1%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.19 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.00 on weekdays and 3.32 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.10 in April to June 2025 to 3.81 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.810.994.003.32 0.0%0 of 9034
Oct to Dec 20253.140.823.312.71 0.0%0 of 9239
Jul to Sep 20253.150.723.302.76 0.0%0 of 9239
Apr to Jun 20253.100.613.232.80 0.0%0 of 9136
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Iowa, Jan to Mar 20263.800.713.983.364.7%0.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeIowaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.617.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.50.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.52.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.53.83.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.42.11.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.616.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.34.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
26.019.415.4

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CARE INITIATIVES. CMS links this home to Care Initiatives, a group of 43 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Care Initiatives5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%11/12/2010
Computershare Corporate Trust Company, Na5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization01/01/2024
Beal, MichaelCorporate directorIndividual06/01/2020
Bowen, LaneCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2021
Carothers, Mary JaneCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2023
Childs, KevinCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2023
Corless, PeterCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Krein, KeithCorporate directorIndividual06/29/2022
Rust, ElizabethCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2023
Sturm, DeniseCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2021
Upmeyer, LindaCorporate directorIndividual06/29/2022
Beal, MichaelCorporate officerIndividual06/01/2020
Dixon, DavidCorporate officerIndividual06/01/2016
Drake, EmilyCorporate officerIndividual01/04/2023
Gilyard, TanyaCorporate officerIndividual05/23/2025
Kuhn, JeramyCorporate officerIndividual06/25/2008
McDyer, JessicaCorporate officerIndividual02/22/2023
Mahler, CarlaOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2025
Oben, PatrickOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2024
Young, VanessaOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/16/2022
Computershare Corporate Trust Company, NaAdp of the SNFOrganization04/07/2025
Oben, PatrickAdp of the SNFIndividual07/28/2025
Young, VanessaAdp of the SNFIndividual04/07/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 14, 2026: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 14, 2026: "Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on September 18, 2025: "Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 30, 2025: "Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.32 hours per resident per day, below the Iowa average of 3.37.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Iowa contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Iowa. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Chariton Specialty Care's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Chariton Specialty Care 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Chariton Specialty Care get at its last inspection?
2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 14, 2026. The Iowa average is 6.5.
Has Chariton Specialty Care been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Chariton Specialty Care accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Chariton Specialty Care?
CMS lists 23 owners and managers, and links the home to Care Initiatives. Legal business name: CARE INITIATIVES.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection