Continuing Care at Highland Springs
7910 Frankford Road, Dallas, TX 75252 · Dallas County · (972) 656-3500
44 certified beds, about 43 residents a day · Non profit - Other · Medicare and Medicaid since 2013
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676329 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 11, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 17 health citations since May 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $29,968 in the last three years; the largest was $29,968, and the latest is dated January 21, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.29 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.13 of those hours.
31.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Erickson Senior Living, an affiliated group of 17 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.
January 21, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- K Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for behavioral services. The facility failed to provide behavioral health care and services to Resident #1 who continued to express suicidal ideations and display signs and symptoms of depression after inpatient treatment for suicidal ideations at a behavioral health hospital stay from [DATE]-[DATE], resulting in Resident #1 ingesting a lethal dose of diphenhydramine (Benadryl) and expiring on [DATE]. An IJ was identified on [DATE] at 5:07 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:25 PM. [...]
- J Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a care comprehensive care plan with interventions and actions the facility could take that were specific to Resident #1's suicidal ideations when she admitted to the facility from an in-patient behavioral health facility on [DATE]. On [DATE] Resident #1 ingested approximately a bottle and a half of Benadryl (Diphenhydramine) and expired at the local hospital. An IJ was identified on [DATE] at 5:07 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:25 PM. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 4: [...]
September 11, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for three (Residents #5, #7, and #33) of six residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Residents #5, #7, and #33's comprehensive care plans addressed their use of psychotropic medications (drugs that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) and related behavioral concerns as identified in their comprehensive assessments. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate interventions not individualized to their mental health care needs. 1. [...]
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for one (Residents #27) of two residents reviewed for medications. The facility failed to ensure LNV A administered a medication as ordered to Resident #27 by crushing Aspirin ER (used to prevent cardiovascular events like heart attack and stroke in high-risk patients) and Potassium ER Chloride (mineral supplement prescribed by a doctor to treat or prevent hypokalemia (low potassium levels); medications that should not be crushed. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. [...]
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure food was properly stored in the facility's freezer. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illnesses. Observation of the facility's freezer on 09/09/24 at 9:23 AM revealed: - 1 tub of ice cream with lid open and exposed to air; - 1 box of pie crust shells open and exposed to air; - 1 box of biscuits open and exposed to air; In an interview on 09/09/2025 at 9:45 AM, the Chef stated she had been unaware that some boxes were open and exposing food to air. She admitted she did not know how to address the issue and had not realized it was a problem. [...]
August 1, 2024Standard inspection · 8 citations
- F Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide information to resident's and their representatives on their rights related to filing grievances or concerns for 1 of 1 facility's reviewed for grievances. The facility failed to make information known to Resident's and their Representatives either individually or through postings in prominent locations throughout the facility on who the facility grievance official was, their contact information, how to file an anonymous grievance and their right to obtain a written decision related to their grievance. The facility failed to ensure Resident's #1,# 2, and# 3 had information known to them on how to file a grievance or concern, who the grievance official was, how to file an anonymous grievance, and their right to obtain a written decision related to their grievance. [...]
- E Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) program for 4 (Resident #3, Resident #5, Resident #7, Resident #8) out of 4 residents reviewed for PASARR assessments. The facility failed to transcribe PL1s' (PASARR Level 1 Screenings) to the LTC Online Portal for 4 (Resident #3, Resident #5, Resident #7, Resident #8) out of 4 residents reviewed for PASARR assessments. This failure could place residents who are eligible for PASARR services at risk of not receiving needed services. Findings Include: Record Review of Resident #5's admission MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 03/16/2024 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old-female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5's active diagnoses included: [...]
- E PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately submit a PL1 (PASARR Level 1 Screening) screening when residents admitted with a diagnosis of Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability or Developmental Disability for 3 (Resident #5, Resident #7, Resident #8) out of 4 residents reviewed for PASARR screenings. The facility failed to submit a new PL1 screening when residents were diagnosed with a new diagnosis of Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability or Developmental Disability during their stay for 1 (Resident #3) out of 4 residents reviewed for PASARR screenings. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #5, Resident #7, and Resident #8 had accurate PL1's on admission. 1. The facility failed to submit a correct PL1 screening for Resident #5 when she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an active diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder. 2. [...]
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 2 (Pod 1 and Pod 2) out of 2 units reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure that the mechanical lift on Pod 1 was locked and secured when not in use. 2. The facility failed to ensure that the mechanical lift on Pod 2 was locked and secured when not in use. 3. The facility failed to ensure a parked wheelchair in the common area on Pod 1 was locked and secured when not in use. 4. The facility failed to ensure that razors intended for shaving use were locked and secured. These failures could place residents at risk for falls and/or injury. Findings Include: Observation of the facility's Pod 1 Unit on 07/30/24 at 9:45 am revealed an unlocked and unsecured mechanical lift parked in front of a resident's room. [...]
- E Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable for two (lunch meal 08/01/24) of four meals reviewed for palatability. [NAME] L added water to the puree recipe on 07/31/2024 . The facility failed to serve pureed mashed potatoes, root vegetable soup, purred roast beef that was palatable. The facility failed to serve mechanical chopped roast beef or root vegetable soup that was palatable. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status and a diminished quality of life. Findings Included: Observation on 08/01/24 at 1:05pm of lunch test tray revealed the pureed lunch was served on a tray with a cover. The purred lunch tray revealed a white ceramic container with pureed mashed potatoes, pureed roast beef, both items were in the same container in round formations. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure that food in the kitchen was labeled, dated and/or sealed. These deficient practices could affect 42 residents who received meals and/or snacks from the main kitchen and place them at risk for food borne illness. Findings Included: Observation of the kitchen on during the Initial Brief Tour on 07/30/2024 at 9:25 AM, revealed that inside the large freezer there was rack in the entry of the freezer that contained a silver pan of pink shrimp on a sheet pan. There was a piece of parchment paper covering the shrimp with a florescent green label dated 07/30. [...]
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences of 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. 1. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 had a mobility device that was accessible and comfortable to her that promoted independence, activity involvement and psychosocial need. This failure could place residents at risk of increased isolation and depression. Findings Include: Record Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 06/26/2024, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included: [...]
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #12) of 8 residents reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 was taken to the bathroom when he requested and did not have to soil himself. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for falls, and a decreased quality of life.
February 8, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of three residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) of 18 residents reviewed for medications and pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure nurses were adequately counting narcotic cards and blister packs, narcotic count audits were conducted to prevent a drug diversion, and nurses were properly disposing of narcotics. Resident #1 and Resident #3 were missing narcotics. Resident #1, #2, and #3 had unexplained wasted (disposed) narcotics from May 2023 to December 2023. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 05/16/23 and ended on 12/11/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. [...]
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide or arrange services as outlined by the comprehensive care plan to meet professional standards for one (Residents #1) of 18 residents observed for medication administration. RN A and LVN B failed to report Resident #1 was missing one hydrocodone pill during narcotic count. RN A and LVN B failed to properly document Resident #1's missing hydrocodone pill during narcotic count. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 12/01/23 and ended on 12/11/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk of not having their medications available as prescribed or possible drug diversions.
May 24, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess each resident quarterly (every 3 months) using the MDS (minimum data set) form specified by the state and approved by CMS for one (Resident #33) of five residents reviewed for quarterly assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33 had a quarterly MDS assessment . This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary care or receiving inappropriate care for their conditions.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Residents #25) for care plan revisions, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #25's care plan was revised to include not using the gait belt during transfers These failures could place residents at risk of receiving inappropriate care.
Fire safety inspections
7 fire safety citations on file: 1 on September 11, 2025, 3 on August 1, 2024, 3 on May 24, 2023.
Every fire safety citation7 citations
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 21, 2026 | Fine | $29,968 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.29 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.13 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.88 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.48 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.69 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 31.4% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 16.7% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.35 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.46 on weekdays and 3.88 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.47 in April to June 2025 to 4.29 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.29 | 1.13 | 4.46 | 3.88 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 43 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.21 | 1.06 | 4.32 | 3.93 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 43 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.34 | 1.05 | 4.51 | 3.92 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 44 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.47 | 1.13 | 4.68 | 3.94 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 43 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Texas
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 30.9 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.9 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: HIGHLAND SPRINGS, INC.. CMS links this home to Erickson Senior Living, a group of 17 nursing homes averaging 4.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Senior Communities, Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 01/14/2021 |
| Brown, Ian | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Brown, Patricia | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Clupper, Katherine | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Colins, Mary | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Erstad, Eileen | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Jacque, Zina | Corporate director | Individual | 12/01/2012 | |
| Leonard, Monty | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Moscato, Mary | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Paulk, Pamela | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Pomeranz, William | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Reel, Stephanie | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Roskiewicz, Michael | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2019 | |
| Sharp, Russel | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Wallick, Daniel | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Colins, Mary | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2019 | |
| Embley, Mark | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Erstad, Eileen | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Hall, John | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Merkert, Robert | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/26/2026 | |
| Paulk, Pamela | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2023 | |
| Sawicki, Scott | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Stiner, Pamela | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Tyler, Daniel | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Erickson Senior Living LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/23/2020 | |
| National Senior Communities, Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/14/2021 | |
| Ancheta, Heather | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/20/2023 | |
| Embley, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Hall, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Merkert, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/26/2026 | |
| Stiner, Pamela | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Studley, Jill | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/23/2022 | |
| Sweetser, Christian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2022 | |
| Bison, Michael | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/24/2025 | |
| Ridley, Fred | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/17/2025 | |
| Sones, Randall | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/17/2025 | |
| Erickson Senior Living LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/25/2025 | |
| Oak Investment Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Oak Investment Trust II | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2025 | |
| Ancheta, Heather | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/20/2023 | |
| Embley, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2022 | |
| Hall, John | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Merkert, Robert | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/26/2026 | |
| Stiner, Pamela | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2024 | |
| Studley, Jill | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/25/2025 | |
| Sweetser, Christian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on January 21, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 21, 2026: "Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on September 11, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 11, 2025: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- The Healthcare Resort of Plano Plano, 1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- The Hillcrest of North Dallas Dallas, 1.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Carrara Plano, 1.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Landmark of Plano Rehabilitation and Nursing Cente Plano, 1.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 42 citations
- Life Care Center of Plano Plano, 2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Richardson Nursing and Rehabilitation Richardson, 2.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 63 citations
- The Reserve at Richardson Richardson, 2.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 35 citations
- The Plaza at Richardson Richardson, 3.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 38 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Continuing Care at Highland Springs's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Continuing Care at Highland Springs 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Continuing Care at Highland Springs get at its last inspection?
- 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 11, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Continuing Care at Highland Springs been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $29,968 in the last three years.
- Does Continuing Care at Highland Springs accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Continuing Care at Highland Springs?
- CMS lists 46 owners and managers, and links the home to Erickson Senior Living. Legal business name: HIGHLAND SPRINGS, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.