1610 Richardson Dr, Richardson, TX 75080 · Dallas County · (972) 600-8219
129 certified beds, about 80 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2018
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676448 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 21, 2026, inspectors cited 14 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 35 health citations since February 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,069 in the last three years; the largest was $14,069, and the latest is dated March 10, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.49 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.23 of those hours.
34.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Hamilton County Hospital District, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 35 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a private meeting space for the residents' monthly council meetings for 11 of 11 confidential residents reviewed for resident council. The facility failed to provide a private space for resident council meetings. This failure could place residents who attended the resident council meetings at risk of not being able to voice concerns due to lack of privacy. Observation and interview on 05/20/2026 at 11:30 a.m. during a confidential resident group meeting held in a private therapy gym, revealed the meeting was normally held in the upstairs dining room. There were no doors or solid walls that separated the dining room from the open nurses' station or the two hallways leading into the dining room. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for six of twenty residents (Residents #29, #44, #70, #74, #78, and #86) and one of three carts (Nurse Cart) reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #78's eye drops were not accessible to other residents on 05/19/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #70 analgesic topical gel was not inside his room on 05/19/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #86 did not have a tube of zinc oxide inside her room on 05/19/2026. 4. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #29 did not have a tube of zinc oxide inside his room on 05/19/2026. 5. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure all food items in the facility's kitchen were dated and discarded prior to their use-by date and were properly sealed. These failures could place residents at risk of food contamination and food-borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for four of twenty residents (Residents #11, #46, #51,and #87) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN C performed hand hygiene when she suctioned, changed the tracheostomy's inner cannula, changed the g-tube's dressing, and changed Resident #11's feeding formula on 05/20/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA D wore a gown while changing Resident #46's linen, who had a midline IV (a thin tube inserted into the vein for delivery of medications) and pressure ulcer, on 05/19/2026. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect, dignity, and care in a manner and environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for one (Resident #87) of nineteen residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to treat Resident #87 with dignity and promote enhancement of their quality of life when the resident was not provided a privacy bag for her catheter bag on 05/20/2026. This failure could place the residents at risk of not having their right to a dignified existence maintained.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for two of ten residents (Resident #54 and Resident #6) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 was free from abuse when Resident #54 hit him on 05/05/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse and emotional stress.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials including to the State Survey Agency where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #54, and #6) reviewed for freedom from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The facility failed to report an allegation of resident abuse for Resident #6 to the State Survey Agency within the allotted time frame of 2 hours, after being advised of the incident occurrence on 05/05/26 when Resident #54 admitted to striking Resident #6. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility was made aware of the incident on 05/05/2026 and did not investigate an allegation of abuse which Resident #6 was struck on the leg by Resident #54. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse/neglect and could lead to a diminished quality of life and psychosocial harm. Record review Resident #54's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnosis included: Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid. Hemorrhage affecting right dominant side. (a type of hemorrhagic stroke indicate damage to the brain. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the residents' environment remained free of hazards as was possible for one of eighteen residents (Resident #87) and one direct care staff (LVN B) of three direct care staff reviewed for accident hazard. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA E did not transfer Resident #87 using a Hoyer lift (a mechanical lift used to transfer an individual with limited mobility) by herself, and leave the resident suspended in the air via the Hoyer lift without supervision on 05/20/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN B did not leave a container of germicidal wipes (substance that destroys germs and microorganism) on top of her cart unattended on 05/20/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of injuries and exposure to toxic chemicals.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infection for two of five residents (Resident #3 and Resident #87) reviewed for incontinent care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's catheter bag was off the floor on 05/19/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure that CNA E did not place Resident #87's catheter bag on top of the resident's bed, rendering the catheter to not be below the bladder while changing the resident's clothing on 05/20/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #87's catheter bag was off the floor on 05/20/2026. These failures could place the residents at risk for urinary tract infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one of four residents (Resident #85) reviewed for feeding tube management. The facility failed to ensure LVN B checked Resident #85's gastric residual and g-tube placement before flushing and administering medications on 05/20/2026. This failure could place residents with g-tubes at risk for tube displacement, clogging, aspiration, and discomfort.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for two of ten residents (Residents #46 and Resident #87) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #46's nasal cannula was stored properly when not in use on 05/21/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #87's nasal cannula (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) was stored properly when not in use on 05/20/2026. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one of ten residents (Resident #67) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to dispose of Resident #67's expired insulin on 05/21/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the medication's full therapeutic benefits and not receiving medications as ordered resulting to adverse effects.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized for for 2 (Resident #20 and Resident #66) of 5 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #20 and Resident #66's OOH-DNR (Out of Hospital-Do Not Resuscitate) were completed correctly with both signatures not meeting the criteria for a qualified witness, making the forms invalid. This failure could affect all residents who have implemented an Advanced Directive and established their choice not to be resuscitated at the risk of receiving CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) against their wishes.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for one (Resident #1's) of ten residents reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. The facility failed to ensure ADON A did not leave Residents #1's medical information exposed and unattended on top of the nurse's station countertop on 12/02/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of their medical information being accessed by unauthorized individuals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in a locked cart or under direct observation of authorized staff in an area where residents could access it for one (Nurse Cart) of one cart reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure that LVN B locked the nurse cart before leaving it unattended on 12/02/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of accessing/opening the cart causing accidental overdose, adverse reactions, or misuse of medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for three (Residents #1, #2, and #3) of ten residents reviewed for Reasonable Accommodation of Needs. The facility failed to ensure the call light systems in Residents #1, #2, and #3's rooms were in a position that was accessible to the resident on 06/18/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance when needed and help in the event of an emergency.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #6) of one residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's breathing mask for his nebulizer (a medical device that turns liquid medicine into mist that could be inhaled through a face mask) was properly stored when not in use on 06/18/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for two (Resident #4 and Resident #5) of two residents reviewed for Storage of Drugs and Biologicals. The facility failed to ensure that no medications were inside Resident #4 and Resident #5's room. This failure could place the residents at risk of overdose or misuse of medications.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #5) of 1 resident reviewed for Infection Control. The facility failed to ensure CNA D performed hand hygiene and changed her gloves while providing incontinent care to Resident #5 on 06/18/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #2, #74, and #182) reviewed for Care Plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was care planned for oxygen administration. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #74 was care planned for condom catheter and hospice care. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #182 was care planned to use the call light to alert staff. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 4 of 8 residents (Resident #2, #19, #39, and #67) reviewed for Respiratory Care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had an order for oxygen administration on 3/11/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's mask for CPAP was stored properly on 3/11/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #39's oxygen tubing was properly stored when not in use on 03/11/2025. 4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distributed, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen, reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure the ice scoop for the ice machine in the facility kitchen was cleaned and not stored inside the ice machine. 2. The facility failed to cover a large trash can stored in the kitchen area. 3. The facility failed to ensure kitchen cooking equipment was cleaned. 4. The facility failed to place a cover on top of the tea dispenser to avoid air borne contaminants. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect, dignity, and care in a manner and environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for one (Resident #58) of nineteen residents reviewed for Dignity. The facility failed to ensure CNA C pulled the privacy bag all the way down on Resident #58's catheter bag (collects urine from the urinary bladder) so the catheter bag and its content would not be visible during lunchtime on 03/11/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of not having their right to a dignified existence maintained.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the timeliness of each resident's person-centered, comprehensive care plan, and to ensure that the comprehensive care plan is reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team for one of (Resident #19) eight residents reviewed for Revised Care Plans. The facility failed to complete a quarterly care plan for Resident #19. These failures placed residents at risk of needs not being met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' environment remained free of accident hazards as was possible for 1of 6 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for accident prevention. The facility failed to ensure resident #25 had physician orders for the bolster pads that were applied to her mattress for fall prevention. This failure could prevent the resident from having an environment that was free and clear of accidents and hazards.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infection and to restore continence to the extent possible for one of (Resident #74) two residents reviewed for Catheter Care. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #74's external catheter (non-invasive to collect urine from the bladder such as a condom catheter) had an order on 03/11/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of needs for catheter care not met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Probiotics) of one medication reviewed for Medication Storage was stored properly. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA F administered Resident #26's probiotics that was properly stored. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN E administered Resident #46' probiotics that was properly stored. These failures could place the residents at risk of not receiving the full benefit of the medications or supplement.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #34) of eight residents reviewed for Infection Control. The facility failed to ensure CNA B changed his gloves after touching the drainage tubing of Resident #72's Foley catheter (device that drains urine from the urinary bladder) during incontinent care on 03/11/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident received adequate supervision to prevent Resident #1's accidents from an elopement for (Resident #1) 1 of 6 residents reviewed for wandering, elopement, accidents, hazards, and supervision. On 01/26/2025, the facility failed to identify potential hazards and follow internal systems in place for Resident #1 to prevent her from exiting thru unlocked doors located in the dining area leading to a corridor land fire exit door which connected to a stairwell where she experienced an unwitnessed fall down the stairs and sustained multiple serious injuries that included right wrist and extensive facial fractures. A Past Non-Compliance Immediate Jeopardy (PNC IJ) was identified and presented to the Administrator and DON on 03/10/2025 at 3:30 PM. The noncompliance began on 01/26/2025 and ended on 02/02/2025. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for two (Resident #12 and Resident # 135) of three residents reviewed for wounds. 1) Resident #12's skin tear to her right forearm was not monitored after she received it on 02/06/24. 2) LVN E failed to treat Resident# 135's wounds on 02/11/24. This failure could place residents at risk for delays in treatment, developing infections and unidentified deterioration of their wounds.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there was an accident involving the resident which resulted in injury and had the potential for requiring physician intervention for one (Resident #12) of three residents reviewed for injuries. The facility failed to notify Resident #12's family after the resident was injured and sustained a skin tear to her right forearm that required ster-strips on 02/06/24. This failure could result in family members and resident representative's not receiving notification of resident injuries.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #135 and Resident #77) reviewed for pressure injury. 1. LVN E failed to treat Resident #135's and Resident #77's wounds on 02/11/24. 2. The WCN failed to ensure Resident #77's head wound was not exposed to infection and contamination when she laid the resident's head on his pillow after cleaning the wound. These failures could place residents at risk for deterioration of wound.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure that food items past their expiration date were discarded. This failure could place residents at risk for food borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #3) of 8 residents reviewed for infection. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A performed hand hygiene during incontinence care for Resident #3. This failure could cause residents to suffer from infection.
10 fire safety citations on file: 3 on May 21, 2026, 1 on March 13, 2025, 6 on February 15, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 10, 2025 | Fine | $14,069 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.49 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.23 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.22 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.21 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.05 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 34.4% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 57.1% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.65 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.60 on weekdays and 3.22 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.3% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.07 in April to June 2025 to 3.49 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.49 | 0.23 | 3.60 | 3.22 | 0.3% | 0 of 90 | 80 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.36 | 0.25 | 3.55 | 2.89 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 87 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.15 | 0.23 | 3.29 | 2.79 | 0.4% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.07 | 0.32 | 3.22 | 2.72 | 0.3% | 0 of 91 | 85 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.2 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.7 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.3 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Reserve at Richardson's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (51.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
51.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 73 eligible stays.
9.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 92 eligible stays.
6.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 59 eligible stays.
69.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 58 residents counted.
1.1% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 94 residents counted.
1.9% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 94 residents counted.
97.6% this home
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 41 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Hamilton County Hospital District, a group of 10 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hooper, Grady | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Dkp Investments, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Go Operations 6 LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Slm Investments LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Golden, Lauren | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Golden, Shawn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Hurst, Roy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Prince, Danny | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Dkp Investments, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Go Operations 6 LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/22/2025 | |
| Go Properties 6, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Slm Investments LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2023 | |
| Golden, Lauren | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Hassan, Syed | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Hurst, Roy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Prince, Danny | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.