Crestview Court
224 W Pleasant Run Rd, Cedar Hill, TX 75104 · Dallas County · (972) 291-5977
125 certified beds, about 86 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2006
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676112 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 18, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 22 health citations since March 2024, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $16,799 in the last three years; the largest was $16,799, and the latest is dated February 21, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.40 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.50 of those hours.
58.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Cantex Continuing Care, an affiliated group of 37 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
June 18, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident on one of four medication carts, Hall (200) and 4 of 4 residents (Residents #38, #40, #79 and #101) reviewed for pharmacy services and establish a system of records of receipt usage and disposition of all controlled drugs on the DON narcotic destruction locker reviewed for Narcotic Destruction record.1. The facility failed to ensure the 200 Hall nurses' medication cart contained accurate narcotic logs for Residents #38, #40, #79 and #101 on 06/17/26.2. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety reviewed for food safety. The facility failed to ensure that only disposable paper towels were disposed of in the garbage receptacle at handwashing sink #1. The facility failed to ensure food items in the walk-in refrigerator included an open date, best by date, an expiration date, were properly stored, sealed, and protected from exposure to air. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness, cross contamination, and infection. During an observation on 06/16/2026 at 10:04 a.m., of the #1 handwashing sink's garbage receptacle the following was revealed: [...]
- E Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were accurately documented and complete in accordance with acceptable professional standards for 2 of 6 (Resident #13 and Resident #50) residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility failed to ensure that an OOH-DNR was uploaded to Resident #13's EMR.The facility failed to ensure that an OOH-DNR was uploaded to Resident #50's EMR.The facility's failure could place the residents at risk of receiving unwanted life-sustaining treatment.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive for 3 of 6 (Residents #6, Residents #15, and Residents #107) residents reviewed for clinical records. Resident #6's OOH-DNR record was incomplete. The date was missing from the Notary section. Resident #15's OOH-DNR record was incomplete. The date of one of two witnesses was missing in the Two Witnesses section. Resident #107's OOH-DNR record was incomplete. The dates were missing from Section C, the Two Witnesses section, and the Physician Statement section. The facility's failure could place residents at risk for not receiving healthcare as per their or their legal representatives' wishes. [...]
- D Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand and send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for discharge planning. The facility failed to notify the residents or the residents' representative or POA of the transfer or discharge with the reasons for the move in writing in a language and manner they understand for Resident #9. This failure could place residents at risk of being discharged without alternative placement, discharge options, their rights to appeal and access to advocacy services. [...]
June 14, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect for one of three incidents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting according to facility policy. CNA A failed to follow the facility's policy to report allegations of neglect when she failed to report Resident #1 fell over hitting her shoulder/neck on the bedrail when she reached for the wheelchair during attempted transfer, in which she did not use a gait belt, on 06/12/25. This failure could place the residents in the facility at risk of neglect and lack of timely reporting of incidents.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report an incident to HHSC involving CNA A failing to perform a safe, proper transfer using a gait-belt for Resident #1 which resulted in the resident bumping against the siderail. The failure placed residents at risk of injuries and neglect of care.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for supervision. CNA A failed to safely transfer Resident #1 from her bed to the wheelchair, which resulted in her losing her grasp of the resident and the resident bumping against the siderail. The failure placed residents at risk of injury.
April 24, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that ensured drugs and biologicals were accurately acquired, received, dispensed, and administered) to meet the needs of each resident for one (the only medication room) of one medication rooms reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure expired medication administration supplies were removed from the only facility medication room. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and having possible adverse effects.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's kitchen, reviewed for food safety. 1. The facility failed to correctly label and date 4 storage bags of cheese. 2. The facility failed to correctly label a cart of water and juice stored in the refrigerator. 3. The facility failed to label and date packages of opened bread. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for one (Resident #52) of four residents reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to ensure potassium (a mineral supplement used to treat or prevent low potassium levels in the blood) was administered to Resident #52 as ordered from 4/10/2025 until 4/23/2025 (13 days). This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving medications as ordered by their physician and not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications.
February 21, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- K Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident was free from physcial abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from physical abuse by CNA A and LVN B. While attempting to collect a urine sample by in and out Cath, CNA held Resident #1's hands down, while LVN B attempted to force apart the legs of the resident. The LVN continued to force the legs and try to catheterize Resident #1 as the resident was screaming, resisting, and asking them to stop. Resident #1 was later assessed by LVN C as he was collecting the urine, by taking the resident to the bathroom, vaginal bleeding was noted. The LVN C assessed Resident #1 she had a laceration to her vaginal area. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, injury, and emotional distress. [...]
- K Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to implement the facility's own written abuse prevention policy and procedure for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from physical abuse by CNA A and LVN B. While attempting to collect a urine sample by in and out Cath, CNA held Resident #1's hands down, while LVN B attempted to force apart the legs of the resident. The LVN continued to force the legs and try to catheterize Resident #1 as the resident was screaming, resisting, and asking them to stop. Resident #1 was later assessed by LVN C as he was collecting the urine, by taking the resident to the bathroom, vaginal bleeding was noted. The LVN C assessed Resident #1 she had a laceration to her vaginal area. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, injury, and emotional distress. [...]
October 17, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of four reviewed for resident call system, in that. 1. Resident #1 and Resident #2's call lights were on the floor and not within reach on 10/10/2024. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for one (400 hall cart) of four medication carts. The facility failed to lock the 400-hall cart leaving all medications on the carts accessible. These failures could affect all resident by placing them at risk for possible drug diversions.
September 20, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for accidents. LVN A failed to provide supervision to prevent accidents when she continued to try to get urine sample after the resident said no, and knowing he was confused and angry, and that he required supervision to ambulate, she saw him get out of bed and closed the door on her way out. This resulted in the resident running down the hall after her and falling, sustain a serious injury. These failures placed the resident at risk for accidents and injuries.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, and neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately but not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for one (Resident #1) of three incidents reviewed for reporting. The facility failed to report within 2 hours to the State Survey Agency when Resident #1 had an altercation with LVN A which resulted in Resident#1 falling face first. Resident#1 was transported to the hospital with a major head injury which supports serious bodily injury. [...]
March 21, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- E Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to within 14 days after a facility completed a resident's assessment, a facility must electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS system for two (Residents #24 and #48) of eight residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility failed to ensure Residents #24 and #48's Admission, Quarterly and Annual MDS assessments was transmitted within 14 days after their MDS Assessments were completed. The MDS Assessments were not completed and submitted timely and accurately on 07/16/23, 10/17/23, 11/01/23, 11/16/23, 02/16/24 and 03/15/24. [...]
- E Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record reviews, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for one (Residents #189) of eight residents reviewed for Medical Records. The facility failed to ensure all of Resident #189's MDS Assessments dated 10/18/23 and 01/29/24 were coded accurately, that she was a female. The facility failed to ensure Resident #189's face sheet identified her as a female. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk of not getting appropriate care and services due to the possible denial of payment for inhouse and outside services. [...]
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown origin were reported immediately to the State agency for one (Resident #6) of six residents reviewed for injuries of unknown origin. The facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency on 03/08/24, when Resident #6 was noted with an injury of unknown origin. This failure could place residents at risk for unreported abuse and/or neglect.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for one (Resident #6) of six residents reviewed for injury of unknown origin. The Administrator failed to start thoroughly investigating an injury of unknown origin when Resident #6 was discovered with fracture of proximal phalanx of left ring finger on 03/08/2024. Failure to timely investigate injuries of unknown origin placed residents at risk for unidentified abuse or neglect.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for one (Resident #76) of six residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan on 03/04/2024 to address Resident #76's need for assistance with Activities of daily living needs due to fracture. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the necessary care or receiving inappropriate care for their condition and diagnosis.
Fire safety inspections
13 fire safety citations on file: 4 on June 18, 2026, 3 on April 24, 2025, 6 on March 21, 2024.
Every fire safety citation13 citations
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- E Have properly installed hallway dispensers for alcohol-based hand rub.
- E Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Have properly installed hallway dispensers for alcohol-based hand rub.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- D Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 21, 2025 | Fine | $16,799 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.40 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.09 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.73 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.17 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.5% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 40.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.13 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.53 on weekdays and 3.09 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.32 in April to June 2025 to 3.40 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.40 | 0.50 | 3.53 | 3.09 | 0.8% | 0 of 90 | 86 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.35 | 0.43 | 3.46 | 3.07 | 0.9% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.38 | 0.38 | 3.52 | 3.04 | 1.0% | 0 of 92 | 85 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.32 | 0.31 | 3.46 | 2.96 | 0.9% | 0 of 91 | 95 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Texas
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.1 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.9 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.0 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.6 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.8 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Cantex Continuing Care, a group of 37 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dallas County Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/15/2015 |
| Castaneda, Edmundo | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/10/2022 | |
| Cerise, Frederick | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/24/2014 | |
| Fm 1382 Health Care Center Ltd Co | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/15/2015 | |
| Clemons, Shakarra | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/16/2024 | |
| Fm 1382 Health Care Center Ltd Co | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/04/2025 | |
| Clemons, Shakarra | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/16/2024 | |
| Hines, Terrance | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/05/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on June 14, 2025: "Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2026: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Cedar Hill Healthcare Center Cedar Hill, 1.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- The Laurenwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Duncanville, 4.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Duncanville Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Duncanville, 4.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 58 citations
- Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLC Desoto, 4.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Williamsburg Village Healthcare Campus Desoto, 4.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 84 citations
- The Lennwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Dallas, 5.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 29 citations
- Desoto Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Desoto, 5.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Five Points Nursing and Rehabilitation Desoto, 5.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 27 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Crestview Court's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Crestview Court 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Crestview Court get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 18, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Crestview Court been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $16,799 in the last three years.
- Does Crestview Court accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Crestview Court?
- CMS lists 8 owners and managers, and links the home to Cantex Continuing Care. Legal business name: DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.