109 Methodist Way, Desoto, TX 75115 · Dallas County · (281) 419-5520
100 certified beds, about 73 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2020
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676492 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 27, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 27 health citations since March 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $27,993 in the last three years; the largest was $15,733, and the latest is dated May 8, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.34 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.68 of those hours.
54.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Hmg Healthcare, an affiliated group of 31 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 27 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for four of six residents (Residents #1, #3, #4, and #5) observed for gastrostomy tube feeding. 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #3, and #4's G-tube dressings were changed and dated. 2. The facility failed to make sure that formula tubing was sealed with a cap to prevent exposure and contamination during downtime for Resident #1 and #5. Thes failures could place residents at risk of contamination and communicable infectious diseases.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, abuse or misappropriation of resident property were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours if the alleged violation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to other officials (including to the State Agency) for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The Administrator, who is the Abuse Coordinator, failed to immediately report (within 2 hours) an allegation of abuse made by Resident #1 on 11/19/25. The failure could affect 72 residents and could result in undetected abuse and/or decline in feelings of safety and well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for peripheral intravenous care. The facility failed to ensure physician orders for Resident #2 were followed to change PICC line dressing every 7 days as ordered. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had access to a private form of communication. 1) The facility removed the landline telephone from the resident's room.2) The facility refused to provide a telephone to the resident when he requested to use one. This failure could cause psychosocial harm to the residents by not allowing them to communicate with people outside of the facility when desired. During the off-site preparation for the investigation, an interview was conducted with the complainant on 09/25/25 at 6:15 PM. The complainant stated [Family Member] demanded the facility not provide Resident #1 access to a telephone to prevent him from communicating with other members of the family. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access for one of three (Medication Cart #1) medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart #1 was locked when unattended, in the 300 Hall, on 09/26/25. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversioFindings included:In an observation and interview on 09/26/25 at 9:28 AM, Medication Cart #1 was observed unlocked and unattended as it set outside room [ROOM NUMBER], across from the nurses' station. There were no staff at the nurses' station. There were no staff in the immediate area. Medication Tech A was observed about 4 rooms down as she passed medication. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the Resident Council Group a private space for monthly resident council meetings for the facility's only resident council. 1. The facility failed to ensure resident council meetings were held in a private meeting space. Staff continued to enter the activities room while the resident council meeting was being held. This failure could place residents at risk of not disclosing concerns or issues, which could lead to emotional turmoil and distress.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing and prevent further development of skin breakdown and infection for one (Resident #12) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (open wound on the skin caused by prolonged pressure to bony prominences). The facility failed to ensure that Resident #12's negative pressure wound device had settings per physician order on 06/25/2025, and 06/26/2025. This failure could place the residents with pressure ulcers at risk for worsening of existing pressure ulcers and infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety. 1. The facility failed to ensure all foods stored in the refrigerator were covered, labeled, and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure dented cans were placed in a separate storage area. 3. The facility failed to discard open items in the dry storage that were not sealed. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination. Findings Included: Observation of the refrigerator on 6/24/2025 at 8:02am revealed the following: -1 tray of 13 drinks dated 6/24/2025 not labeled. -1 tray of 8 fruit cups not labeled or dated. Observation of the dry storage on 6/24/2025 at 8:10am revealed the following: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain grooming for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18 call lights were answered in a timely manner. This deficient practice could affect Resident #18's feelings of dissatisfaction or poor self-esteem.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Residents #123 and #124) of twenty residents reviewed for Infection Control. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA G sanitized the blood pressure cuff while administering medications and checking vital signs of Residents #123 and #124 on 06/24/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA G performed hand hygiene prior to resident contact and care for Resident #124 on 06/24/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or main the highest practicable psychosocial well-being for 17 residents. 1. The facility failed to ensure calls directed to a centralized staff work area were answered. 2. The facility failed to ensure the centralized staff work area had a portable phone available and the portable phone was properly functionating. This failure could place 17 residents on hall 200 with limited resources or other services necessary to provide for the needs of the residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for discharge planning. The facility failed to implement an effective discharge plan for Resident #1, when FM S reported the resident's home was without electricity. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 04/25/2025 at 5:57 PM. The ADM and DON was notified and provided an IJ template, and a POR (Plan of Removal) was requested. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that when the facility anticipated discharge of one (Residents #1) of three residents reviewed, there was a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay. The closed records for Residents #1 that were reviewed did not contain facility discharge summaries that included a recapitulation of the residents' stay, signature of FM S/RP/POA confirmation of aftercare services for a resident that was impaired cognitively on 03/31/2025. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 04/25/2025 at 5:57 PM. The ADM and DON was notified and provided an IJ template, and a POR (Plan of Removal) was requested. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to maintain the highest practicable well-being of each resident reviewed for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for Administration. The ADM and DON failed to ensure residents discharged home were provided the appropriate supervision and care before returning home. The ADM directed staff to discharge Resident #1 home without knowing she was diagnosed with dementia, confusion, altered mental status, and no POA. The IDT failed to notify the NP/MD of Resident #1's discharge home alone without services. The ADM, DON, and CM T returned Resident #1 to an unsafe home environment without investigating and following up prior to sending her home in an Uber (ride share). [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse signed and certified that the MDS assessment was completed for 3 (Resident #1, #6, and #7) of 8 residents reviewed for completion, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 admission MDS was completed, reviewed, and signed by the designated RN/DON, and discharge MDS was completed prior to discharge on [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's admission MDS was completed after admission on [DATE]. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's quarterly section GG was completed, reviewed, and signed by all disciplines. These failures could prevent communication about a resident's status from being transmitted to CMS and could interfere with residents receiving needed services before and after discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan to include measurable objectives and timeframes to attain or maintain the resident's highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 4 of 10 (Resident #1, #6, #7, and #8) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan addressed her anxiety and discharge goals, objectives, and interventions. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6, #7, and #8's care plan addressed their discharge goals, objectives, and interventions.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident who experiences a significant change in status is comprehensively assessed within 14 days for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for significant change. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 1 had a Significant Change Assessment completed after she had a change in altered mental status. This failure could contribute to providing an inaccurate assessment of resident's most current medical condition and could lead to failure to not provide necessary care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to adequately assess and treat Resident #1's severe breakthrough pain as he was screaming in unrelenting pain. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance. The Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 02/05/25 at 1:02 PM and was removed on 02/05/25 at 4:15 PM. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began on 02/04/25. The Immediate Jeopardy occurred in the past and the facility had already corrected the non-compliance. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for one resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for change in physical, mental, or psychosocial status. 1. The facility failed to complete routine neuro checks after Resident #1 had a fall on the morning of 02/01/25, and continued to have pain. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began on 02/04/25. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for a delay in medical treatment, worsening in condition, or hospitalization.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for accuracy of medical records in that: 1. LVN A did not document the administration of Tylenol Arthritis 650 MG on the Medication Administration Record during the morning shift on 02/01/25 for Resident #1 and failed to document the time of the Tylenol Arthritis 650 MG administration on the progress notes in Resident #1's file. 2. LVN A failed to document any pain assessments or neuro checks for Resident #1 after he had a fall on the morning of 02/01/25. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began on 02/04/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the Family Member of a significant change in the resident's health status; or a need to alter treatment significantly for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for parameters to notify the family of a change in condition. 1. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's Family Member after he had an unwitnessed fall and had breakthrough pain on the morning of 02/01/25. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance. The facility corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began on 02/04/25. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for not having an advocate, delay in medical treatment, or decline in health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 (Resident #13) of 6 residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13's call button was accessible on 07/15/24. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to obtain assistance for activities of daily living or in the event of an emergency and their needs not being met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to properly store, date, and label food items in the walk-in freezer. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of three (CNA A) staff members and four of six residents (Resident #11, #26, #134, & #150) reviewed for infection control procedures. CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene after direct contact with residents #11, #26, #134, and #150 while serving meals on the hallways . This failure could place residents at risk for healthcare associated cross contamination and infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for three (Residents #6, #70, and #235) of 18 residents on at least one (Hall 200) of four halls reviewed for ADL assistance. The facility failed to respond to call lights in a timely manner for Residents #6, #70, and #235, who required staff supervision/assistance with ADLs. This failure could place all residents at risk for diminished physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who is fed by enteral means receives appropriate treatment and services for one (Resident #56) of one residents reviewed with feeding tubes. The facility failed to put a procedure in place to ensure that Resident #56's enteral feedings were being given continuously for 22 hours with two hours downtime as ordered by the physician, when a timeframe for the downtime was not specified in the orders. This failure could place all residents who had feeding tubes at risk for dehydration, weight loss, and/or metabolic abnormalities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored securely for one (Resident# 2) of 18 residents observed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was not left with fluticasone nasal spray in the room after it was administered. This failure could place residents at risk of overmedication or adverse drug reactions.
22 fire safety citations on file: 15 on June 27, 2025, 7 on May 17, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2025 | Fine | $12,260 |
| February 5, 2025 | Fine | $15,733 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.34 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.68 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.83 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.34 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.32 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 54.6% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 40.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.24 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.54 on weekdays and 3.83 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.42 in April to June 2025 to 4.34 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.34 | 0.68 | 4.54 | 3.83 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 73 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.27 | 0.73 | 4.45 | 3.79 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 78 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.45 | 0.57 | 4.63 | 4.00 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 78 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.42 | 0.52 | 4.60 | 3.96 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 87 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.8 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.0 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.9 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (64.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
64.6% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 236 eligible stays.
9.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 250 eligible stays.
5.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 146 eligible stays.
64.6% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 130 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 202 residents counted.
1.9% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 202 residents counted.
72.2% this home
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 72 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: METHODIST TRANSITIONAL CARE CENTER-DESOTO LLC. CMS links this home to Hmg Healthcare, a group of 31 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cibc Bank USA | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Hmg Healthcare LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 11/01/2019 | |
| Methodist Hospitals of Dallas | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 11/01/2019 | |
| Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 03/15/2020 | |
| Zions Bancorporation | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Anthamatten, Dustin | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2019 | |
| Daspit, Laurence | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2019 | |
| Laukaitis, Frances W | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2019 | |
| Cibc Bank USA | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2021 | |
| Desoto Rehabilitation Institute LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2019 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Global Prime Health, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Methodist Hospitals of Dallas | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/15/2020 | |
| Zions Bancorporation | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2021 | |
| Balsamo, Krystal | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Culp, Roland | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Daspit, Laurence | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Davis, Georgette | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/20/2001 | |
| Dohn, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Perkins, Catina | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/15/2024 | |
| Pico, Ana | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Prince, Derek | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Reinarz, Christian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Vega, Brandi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/15/2023 | |
| Prince, Derek | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/26/2025 | |
| Cibc Bank USA | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Global Prime Health, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/15/2020 | |
| Methodist Hospitals of Dallas | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/15/2020 | |
| Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/15/2020 | |
| Zions Bancorporation | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Anthamatten, Dustin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/15/2020 | |
| Balsamo, Krystal | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Culp, Roland | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Daspit, Laurence | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Davis, Georgette | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/14/2023 | |
| Dohn, William | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Laukaitis, Frances W | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/15/2020 | |
| Perkins, Catina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/15/2024 | |
| Pico, Ana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Prince, Derek | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Reinarz, Christian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Sedighi, Hooman | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/15/2020 | |
| Stanbridge, Norma | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Vega, Brandi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/15/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.