Crestview Retirement Community
2505 E Villa Maria Rd, Bryan, TX 77802 · Brazos County · (979) 776-4778
48 certified beds, about 44 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675979 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 7, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 10 health citations since June 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.29 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.39 of those hours.
10.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Methodist Retirement Communities, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 10 health citations on file.
June 24, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for one of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from abuse and neglect on 05/03/2026 when CNA A verbally abused Resident #1 and neglected to give care when Resident #1 requested assistance to the bathroom. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse, neglect, trauma, and psychosocial harm.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys to 1 of 2 medication carts (Medication Cart #1) reviewed for drug storage and labeling. The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart #1, was locked, medications secured, and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors. This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to medications, decreased effectiveness of medication, or missing medications.
August 7, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 6 of 12 (Residents #1, #5, #6, #7, #20 and #40) residents reviewed for bed rails. The facility failed to assess Residents #1, #5, #6, #7, #20 and #40 for entrapment from bed rails or obtain documentation of informed consent before using bed rails on the residents' beds. This failure could place residents at risk of injury from entrapment.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 3 kitchens (main kitchen) reviewed for food safety. 1. The facility failed to ensure the ED and DRM wore a hair restraint while in the kitchen on 08/05/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure the DM wore gloves while preparing prepared ham sandwiches in the kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk of food-borne illness.
July 25, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater when the facility had a medication error rate of 36.36% based on 16 errors of 44 opportunities, which involved 2 of 5 residents (Resident #8 and Resident #10) observed during medication administration. 1. The facility failed to hold Resident #10's medication due to low heart rate. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's extended release (ER) medications were not crushed and the resident received the full dose of her medications. These failures could place residents at risk of unwanted side effects and not receiving therapeutic dosage of medications.
- E Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its residents were free of any significant medication errors for one (Resident #8) of five residents reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's extended release (ER) medications, including Glipizide 2.5mg ER, Bupropion 300mg ER, and Metoprolol Succinate 50mg ER were not crushed prior to administration and that Resident # 8 received the full dose of her medications. These failures could place residents at risk of unwanted side effects, not receiving therapeutic dosage of medications, and ineffective disease management.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for sanitation. The facility failed to discard of food products in the walk-in freezer that were past their facility indicated use by date. The facility failed to label and date food products in the walk-in freezer. The facility failed to clean their industrial can opener. These failures could place residents at risk of cross contamination, loss of nutritional value, and foodborne illness.
June 2, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervisions and assistive devices for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #17) reviewed for accidents and hazards, in that: Facility failed to adequately supervise and ensure staff checked the coffee temperature prior to serving to residents which resulted in Resident #17 spilling a pot of coffee over his lap resulting in 1st and 2nd degree burns to his bilateral thighs and down his legs to his ankles. On 05/31/2023 at 2:40 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 06/02/2023, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of isolated harm due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. [...]
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in one of one walk in refrigerator. The facility failed to label and date leftover, opened foods in the walk-in refrigerator in the kitchen. This failure could place the residents at risk of foodborne illness and decreased quality of life.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1of 16 residents reviewed with limited range of motion (Resident #2), received appropriate treatment and services to prevent a decline in range of motion. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had interventions in place for her right- and left-hand contracture (A permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen and a decrease in ROM) to prevent further decline of the range of motion in her right and left hand. This deficient practice placed residents with contractures at risk for decrease in mobility, range of motion, and contribute to worsening of contractures. Findings Include: [...]
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.29 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.53 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.60 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.29 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 10.0% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.25 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.59 on weekdays and 3.53 on weekends, 23% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.37 in April to June 2025 to 4.29 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.29 | 0.39 | 4.59 | 3.53 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 44 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.40 | 0.43 | 4.74 | 3.55 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 44 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.54 | 0.47 | 4.87 | 3.71 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 44 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.37 | 0.45 | 4.69 | 3.55 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 45 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.2 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.6 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.3 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.9 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: MRC CRESTVIEW. CMS links this home to Methodist Retirement Communities, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 4.7 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methodist Retirement Communities | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 02/22/2008 | |
| Mrc Crestview | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/23/2014 | |
| The Aldersgate Trust | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 12/17/2004 | |
| Truist Bank | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 12/06/2019 | |
| Umb Bank National Association | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 09/01/2016 | |
| Baggett, Alyce | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2013 | |
| Besser, Alicia | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Brown, Alan | Corporate director | Individual | 04/13/2020 | |
| Bunch, James | Corporate director | Individual | 08/13/2020 | |
| Conger, Dale | Corporate director | Individual | 02/21/2020 | |
| Gilts, Kip | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2020 | |
| King, William | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2018 | |
| Koerner, William | Corporate director | Individual | 02/21/2020 | |
| Malone-Wardley, Romonica | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Morgan, Richard | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2017 | |
| Simmons, Ed | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Watson, Frankie | Corporate director | Individual | 11/12/2021 | |
| Williamson, Billy | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2004 | |
| Woodward, Walter | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Brown, Alan | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/13/2020 | |
| Currie, Matthew | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/21/2025 | |
| Stephens, Donald | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2015 | |
| Adams, Michael | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2007 | |
| Partin, Todd | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Sims, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/02/2021 | |
| Thomas, Amy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/10/2025 | |
| The Aldersgate Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/17/2004 | |
| Sims, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/02/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 24, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2025: "Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on June 24, 2026: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Avir at Bryan Bryan, 0.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Lampstand Nursing and Rehabilitation Bryan, 0.4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 53 citations
- Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation Bryan, 0.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 40 citations
- Five Points Nursing & Rehabilitation of College St. College Station, 5.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Fortress Nursing and Rehabilitation College Station, 6.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Accel at College Station College Station, 6.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 50 citations
- Crossroads Nursing & Rehabilitation Hearne, 20.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Copperas Hollow Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Caldwell, 23.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 21 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Crestview Retirement Community's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Crestview Retirement Community 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Crestview Retirement Community get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 7, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Crestview Retirement Community been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Crestview Retirement Community accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Crestview Retirement Community?
- CMS lists 28 owners and managers, and links the home to Methodist Retirement Communities. Legal business name: MRC CRESTVIEW.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.