Cumbernauld Village
716 Tweed Street, Winfield, KS 67156 · Cowley County · (620) 221-4141
42 certified beds, about 32 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2022
CMS high performing icon Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175569 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 9, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 10 health citations since November 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.81 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.06 of those hours.
42.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
311/22
506/24
204/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 10 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
7D
1E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 9, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate infection control practices related to urinary catheter care (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag), peri-hygiene, and shared mechanical lift use.
- D Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 6 had a stop order for the use of as-needed (PRN) antianxiety (a class of medication that calms and relaxes people as required.
June 5, 2024Standard inspection · 5 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare food under sanitary conditions, for the residents of the facility related to the appropriate use of hair restraints, beard restraints, and cross contamination following handwashing.
- F Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and/or dispose of garbage and refuse properly in a sanitary condition to prevent the harborage and feeding of pests.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 34 residents with 13 residents sampled, including five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to review and revise one dependent Resident's (R)29's care plan to include non-pharmacological interventions for pain.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 34 residents with 13 selected for review, which included one resident reviewed for activities of daily living. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)30 received grooming per his usual preference.
- D Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food consistent with required recipes to ensure nutritional value and preservation of vitamins for three residents identified to receive pureed diets.
November 17, 2022Standard inspection · 3 citations
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wrote- Review of Resident (R)13's electronic medical record (EMR) included a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the staff assessment for pain revealed severe cognitive impairment. She required extensive assistance of one staff for locomotion with her wheelchair. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/25/22, did not trigger for further review. The quarterly MDS, dated 10/21/22, documented the staff assessment for cognition revealed severe cognitive impairment. She required extensive assistance of one staff for locomotion with her wheelchair. [...]
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 34 residents, with 16 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate care for the two dependent Residents (R) 32 and R25 regarding oral hygiene cares.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 34 residents with 16 selected for review which included five residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff provided foot pedals on wheelchairs to prevent accidents, while propelling three of the five residents (R)6, R13 and R28, reviewed for accident hazards.
Fire safety inspections
9 fire safety citations on file: 5 on June 5, 2024, 4 on November 17, 2022.
Every fire safety citation9 citations
- F Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Have an alternate power supply for its alarm system.
- F Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.81 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.06 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.94 | 3.60 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 4.19 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.55 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.6% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 11.1% | 42.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.39 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.16 on weekdays and 4.94 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.90 in April to June 2025 to 5.81 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.81 | 1.06 | 6.16 | 4.94 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 32 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.47 | 1.07 | 5.79 | 4.65 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 34 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.07 | 1.09 | 5.45 | 4.12 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 37 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.90 | 1.07 | 5.34 | 3.81 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 35 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 4.19 | 3.56 | 4.8% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.5 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.8 | 16.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 18.1 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: CUMBERNAULD VILLAGE, INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cumbernauld Village, Inc. | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/25/1987 |
| Andreas, David | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2015 | |
| Blake, Bruce | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/25/1987 | |
| Long, Jill | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/1992 | |
| McNeish, Marilyn | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 09/25/1987 | |
| Steffen, Rodger | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/1994 | |
| Taylor, Sharon | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/1988 | |
| Teubner, Doug | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2007 | |
| Andreas, David | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2015 | |
| Griggs, Sarah | Corporate director | Individual | 08/02/2023 | |
| Steffen, Rodger | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/1994 | |
| Teubner, Doug | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2007 | |
| Blake, Bruce | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/25/1987 | |
| Long, Jill | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/1992 | |
| McNeish, Marilyn | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/25/1987 | |
| Taylor, Sharon | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/1988 | |
| Cumbernauld Village, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/25/1987 | |
| Griggs, Sarah | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/02/2023 | |
| Cumbernauld Village, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/25/1987 | |
| Andreas, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2015 | |
| Blake, Bruce | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/25/1987 | |
| Griggs, Sarah | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/02/2023 | |
| Long, Jill | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/1992 | |
| McNeish, Marilyn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/25/1987 | |
| Steffen, Rodger | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/1994 | |
| Taylor, Sharon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/1988 | |
| Teubner, Doug | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2007 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 5, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 5, 2024: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 5, 2024: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Kansas Veterans Home Winfield, 0.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- Winfield Senior Living Community Winfield, 1.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Winfield Rest Haven II, LLC Winfield, 1.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Medicalodges Arkansas City Arkansas City, 12.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Arkansas City Presbyterian Manor Arkansas City, 12.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- Villa Maria Mulvane, 21.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Advena Living at Fountainview Rose Hill, 23.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 35 citations
- Botkin Care and Rehab Wellington, 23.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 10 citations
Common questions
- What is Cumbernauld Village's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Cumbernauld Village 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Cumbernauld Village get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 9, 2026. The Kansas average is 9.5.
- Has Cumbernauld Village been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Cumbernauld Village accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Cumbernauld Village?
- CMS lists 27 owners and managers. Legal business name: CUMBERNAULD VILLAGE, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.