Find a nursing home

Home / Massachusetts / Wellesley

Elizabeth Seton

125 Oakland Street, Wellesley, MA 02481 · Norfolk County · (781) 997-1130

84 certified beds, about 88 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1981

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 225266 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 27, 2025, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Massachusetts average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).

None of its 7 health citations since August 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.97 hours per resident per day, against 3.86 across Massachusetts and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.58 of those hours.

23.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Massachusetts average 38.2%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 7 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
5D
1E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
August 27, 2025Standard inspection · 0 citations
September 4, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff developed and implemented a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two Residents (#63 and #34), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically: 1.) For Resident #63, the facility failed to ensure nursing implemented a care plan intervention for bilateral floor mats for fall prevention. 2.) For Resident #34, the facility failed to ensure nursing developed and implemented a care plan intervention for bilateral floor mats for fall prevention.
  2. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services in accordance with professional standards of care and the plan of care for one Resident (#31) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing implemented a physician's order to change Resident #31's oxygen tubing.
  3. B
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for two Residents (#63 and #80) out of 18 total sampled residents. Specifically: 1.) For Resident #63, the presence external urinary catheter (a hollow, partially flexible tube that externally collects urine from the bladder and leads to a drainage bag) and ostomy (a surgically created opening from an area inside the body to the outside of the body) was inaccurately coded in the MDS. 2.) For Resident #80, the facility inaccurately coded the MDS to indicate the Resident had come off of skilled services.
August 31, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for 4 Residents (#1, #17, #18, and #21) from a total sample of 23 residents. Finding Included: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans-Comprehensive, undated, indicated the following: Policy Interpretation and Implementation *2. Residents will have a person-centered comprehensive care plan developed and implemented to meet his other preferences and goals, and address the resident's medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs. *10. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and resident's condition change. 1. For Resident #21 the facility failed to implement the medical plan of care for Resident #21's daily use of hearing aids for communication in accordance with the physician's orders. [...]
  2. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the physician's orders for one Resident (#43) out of a sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to update the physician's orders after Resident #43 was determined to not be at risk for elopement.
  3. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications 1. were stored properly and labeled 2. medications were refrigerated per manufacturer's directions, 3. once opened were dated as required and 4. topical and treatment items were not stored with oral medications.
  4. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for one Resident (#43) out of a sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility documented that Resident #43's wander guard alarm was administered, when it wasn't.

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMassachusettsUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.973.863.86
Registered nurses0.580.650.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.733.483.42
Nurse aides2.37
Licensed practical nurses1.02
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)23.1%38.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover23.1%42.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.89 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.08 on weekdays and 3.73 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.13 in April to June 2025 to 3.97 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.970.584.083.73 0.5%0 of 9088
Oct to Dec 20253.960.614.113.60 2.4%0 of 9288
Jul to Sep 20254.070.534.203.75 1.7%0 of 9287
Apr to Jun 20254.130.534.273.78 2.2%0 of 9187
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Massachusetts, Jan to Mar 20263.790.613.943.415.0%0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMassachusettsUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
26.316.413.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.30.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.81.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.73.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.31.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
35.515.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.24.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.721.415.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
28.725.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
16.911.912.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.01.91.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.91.51.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: ELIZABETH SETON RESIDENCE INC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Cronin, LaurenCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2020
Gilmore, JaneCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2022
Grover, CarolynCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2020
Johnson, EricCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2022
Jones, CatherineCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2023
Kerins, MaryCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2021
Munchak, AnthonyCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2021
Nilles, KathleenCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2018
Park, JudithCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2017
Peyton, JuliaCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2022
Sintros, ChristopherCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2019
Stare, CathyCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2021
Ferrante, LoriCorporate officerIndividual08/15/2013
Kerins, MaryCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2021
O'Keefe, JoanCorporate officerIndividual09/27/2014
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/13/2020
Akut, MarissaOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/26/2021
Anfang, StuartOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/13/2020
Berman, AdamOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/13/2020
Berman, BarryOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/13/2020
Bolberova, OlgaOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/29/2024
Brudnick, JeffreyOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/13/2020
Callahan, MeganOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2018
Chen, JianwuOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/02/2022
Cronin, LaurenOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2020
Dimonda, RosalbaOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/28/2017
Faublas, PascaleOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/04/2023
Ferrante, LoriOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/15/2013
Fiebelkorn, DouglasOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/13/2020
Forman, SharonOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/13/2020
Gilmore, JaneOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2022
Goldsmith, SusanOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/13/2020
Greenspan, HowardOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/13/2020
Grover, CarolynOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/02/2020
Johnson, EricOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2022
Jones, CatherineOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2023
Kamara, HawaOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/04/2024
Kerins, MaryOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2021
Mullen, ElizabethOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/13/2020
Munchak, AnthonyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2021
Nilles, KathleenOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2018
O'Keefe, JoanOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/27/2014
Park, JudithOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2017
Paul, MarieOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/14/2014
Peyton, JuliaOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2022
Richman, GildaOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2002
Santerre, JenniferOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/13/2020
Selig, PatriciaOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/14/2021
Sintros, ChristopherOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2019
Stare, CathyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2021
Weiss, JudyOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/13/2020
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare IncAdp of the SNFOrganization07/15/2025
Akut, MarissaAdp of the SNFIndividual04/26/2021
Berman, AdamAdp of the SNFIndividual11/13/2020
Berman, BarryAdp of the SNFIndividual11/13/2020
Bolberova, OlgaAdp of the SNFIndividual07/29/2024
Callahan, MeganAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2018
Chen, JianwuAdp of the SNFIndividual02/02/2022
Dimonda, RosalbaAdp of the SNFIndividual06/28/2017
Faublas, PascaleAdp of the SNFIndividual04/04/2023
Ferrante, LoriAdp of the SNFIndividual08/15/2013
Kamara, HawaAdp of the SNFIndividual06/04/2024
Mullen, ElizabethAdp of the SNFIndividual11/13/2020
Paul, MarieAdp of the SNFIndividual03/04/2014
Richman, GildaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2002
Santerre, JenniferAdp of the SNFIndividual11/13/2020
Selig, PatriciaAdp of the SNFIndividual12/14/2021

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on September 4, 2024: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on September 4, 2024: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on August 31, 2023: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."

Other nursing homes nearby

Common questions

What is Elizabeth Seton's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Elizabeth Seton 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Elizabeth Seton get at its last inspection?
0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 27, 2025. The Massachusetts average is 6.8.
Has Elizabeth Seton been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Elizabeth Seton accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Elizabeth Seton?
CMS lists 67 owners and managers. Legal business name: ELIZABETH SETON RESIDENCE INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection