Find a nursing home

Home / Massachusetts / Needham

Skilled Nursing Facility at North Hill (the)

865 Central Avenue, Needham, MA 02492 · Norfolk County · (781) 444-9910

72 certified beds, about 62 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1985

Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
CMS note: The accuracy of the staffing data for this measure could not be validated by CMS.
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 225281 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 18, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Massachusetts average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).

Of 11 health citations since May 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $16,153 in the last three years; the largest was $16,153, and the latest is dated January 15, 2025.

24.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Massachusetts average 38.2%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
2J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
7D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 18, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#10), out of a total sample of 18 residents, was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) dose of Seroquel (antipsychotic) was limited to no more than14 days as required.
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized, person-centered care plan to meet the physical, psychosocial, and functional needs of one Resident (#12), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed to address the use of psychotropic medication that identified target behaviors and individualized, measurable non-pharmacological interventions and measurable goals of treatment.
  3. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that for one Resident (#9), of a total sample of 18 residents, that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled accurately and in accordance with the physician's order.
January 15, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. J
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was newly admitted to the Facility, was confused, was noted to wander without regard for his/her own safety, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with quality care and services that meet professional standards of practice. When although he/she was assessed by two different nurses upon admission as triggering for placement of a WanderGuard bracelet for safety, a device was not placed on him/her, and despite his/her continual wandering day and night, nursing did not reassess or re-evaluate their decision regarding placement of a WanderGuard. On [DATE], unbeknownst to staff, Resident #1 wandered off his/her unit, took the elevator to the Lobby and exited out the front door of the Facility, undetected by anyone. [...]
  2. J
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 29, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who required the assistance of one staff member for ambulation, exhibited increased wandering and exit seeking with the need for frequent redirection by staff for safety, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance/supervision to prevent him/her from eloping and sustaining serious injuries. On [DATE], at approximately 6:00 P.M., unbeknownst to staff, Resident #1 wandered off his/her unit, took the elevator to the main lobby, and although there was a Receptionist assigned to and seated in the Lobby, who was responsible for unlocking the main entrance door to let visitors and staff in/out, Resident #1 was able to exit through the main Lobby door, undetected and left the Facility. [...]
July 11, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to ensure residents who were eligibility to receive the recommended pneumococcal vaccine (PCV-20), were offered the vaccination and they or their legal representatives were educated on the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccine in a timely manner for three Residents (#52, #59, and #41), out of a total sample size of five residents reviewed for immunizations.
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered plan of care which included care and management for one Resident (#59) who had been determined to exhibit a behavior of wandering and was determined by the staff to be a risk of elopement (an incident when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization or the necessary supervision to do so safely), out of a total sample of 15 residents.
  3. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure their staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) in accordance with the requirements to prevent unnecessary exposure and the potential spread of COVID-19 infections while providing care and attending to the needs of a COVID-19 positive resident.
May 18, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement and follow their abuse policy related to the need to immediately report an allegation of potential abuse to the Administrator or the Director of Nursing to protect other residents from potential abuse for one Resident (#4), out of a total of 26 sampled residents.
  2. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the state agency in a timely manner for one Resident (#4), out of a total of 26 sampled residents.
  3. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on records reviewed and interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive (Annual) Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in a timely manner for one Resident (#14) and failed to complete discharge MDS assessments in a timely manner for two Residents (#60 and #46), out of a total sample of 26 residents.

Fire safety inspections

3 fire safety citations on file: 1 on July 11, 2024, 2 on May 18, 2023.

Every fire safety citation3 citations
  1. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · July 11, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · May 18, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · May 18, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
January 15, 2025Fine $16,153

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMassachusettsUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)not reported3.863.86
Registered nursesnot reported0.650.69
All nursing staff on weekendsnot reported3.483.42
Nurse aidesnot reported
Licensed practical nursesnot reported
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)24.3%38.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover26.9%42.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS note on this home's staffing data: The accuracy of the staffing data for this measure could not be validated by CMS.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 7.06 on weekdays and 6.33 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 6.81 in April to June 2025 to 6.85 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20266.851.457.066.33 2.2%0 of 9062
Oct to Dec 20257.431.577.616.97 1.4%0 of 9263
Jul to Sep 20256.331.476.505.93 0.9%0 of 9265
Apr to Jun 20256.811.377.056.22 1.0%0 of 9166
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Massachusetts, Jan to Mar 20263.790.613.943.415.0%0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Massachusetts

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Massachusetts, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.44$21.32 to $23.9438,130
LPNs and LVNs$38.57$34.91 to $40.6613,210
Registered nurses$50.27$42.05 to $65.4488,200
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Skilled Nursing Facility at North Hill (the). No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMassachusettsUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.916.413.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.10.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.41.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.33.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.41.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
20.415.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.54.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.921.415.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.025.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
12.111.912.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.31.91.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.01.51.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Skilled Nursing Facility at North Hill (the)'s Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (63.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

63.0% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Massachusetts: 121 better, 19 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 270 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Massachusetts: 4 better, 15 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 294 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

5.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Massachusetts: 5 better, 4 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 176 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

70.8% this home

Median of homes: Massachusetts51.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 120 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.7% this home

Median of homes: Massachusetts0.4% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 144 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Massachusetts2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 144 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Massachusetts99.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 91 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: NORTH HILL NEEDHAM, INC..

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Barth, SuzanneCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2022
Corsini, RussellCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2016
Creed, SarahCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2015
Davis, RichardCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2016
Downey, SusanCorporate directorIndividual03/31/2024
Fischer, StephenCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2024
Goff, StewartCorporate directorIndividual02/12/2025
Grimes, KevinCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2018
Handel, ElizabethCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2024
Hoffmann, NancyCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2017
Mahoney, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2024
Mellace, SusanCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2015
Pingitore, PeterCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2024
Reich Weil, AmyCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2018
Vasconcelles, Martina Anne OechsleCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2016
Bere, KaralynCorporate officerIndividual09/15/2024
Frias, JosephCorporate officerIndividual07/15/2023
4m Building Solutions, LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization07/22/2019
Sadia's Health and Wellness Consulting, IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/08/2021
Benoit, PaulOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/24/2001
Bermudez, EmilyOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/06/2023
Downey, SusanOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/28/2022
Frias, JosephOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/15/2023
Goff, StewartOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/12/2025
Merchant, AsifOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2023
Barth, SuzanneTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/01/2022
Corsini, RussellTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/01/2016
Creed, SarahTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/01/2015
Davis, RichardTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/01/2016
Fischer, StephenTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/01/2024
Grimes, KevinTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/01/2018
Handel, ElizabethTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/01/2024
Hoffmann, NancyTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/01/2017
Mahoney, WilliamTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/01/2024
Mellace, SusanTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/01/2015
Pingitore, PeterTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/01/2024
Reich Weil, AmyTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/01/2018
Vasconcelles, Martina Anne OechsleTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/01/2016
4m Building Solutions, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization07/14/2025
A.v. Powell & Associates, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization12/15/1999
Aqueduct Technologies, IncAdp of the SNFOrganization03/14/2025
Babson CollegeAdp of the SNFOrganization11/14/1978
Baker Tilly Us LLPAdp of the SNFOrganization12/16/2024
Clay & Associates, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2023
Focus Technology Solutions, IncAdp of the SNFOrganization01/03/2023
Health Care Continuum SpecialistsAdp of the SNFOrganization06/01/2023
Jensen Hughes, Inc.Adp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2020
Manufacturers & Traders Trust CompanyAdp of the SNFOrganization01/25/2012
Prime Buchholz LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization11/08/2004
Sadia's Health and Wellness Consulting, IncAdp of the SNFOrganization07/29/2025
Benoit, PaulAdp of the SNFIndividual06/24/2001
Bere, KaralynAdp of the SNFIndividual09/10/2024
Bermudez, EmilyAdp of the SNFIndividual03/06/2023
Costa, NatalieAdp of the SNFIndividual09/15/1997
Downey, SusanAdp of the SNFIndividual03/28/2022
Frias, JosephAdp of the SNFIndividual07/15/2023
Goff, StewartAdp of the SNFIndividual02/12/2025
Merchant, AsifAdp of the SNFIndividual06/01/2023

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 18, 2025: "Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 18, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 15, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 11, 2024: "Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Common questions

What is Skilled Nursing Facility at North Hill (the)'s Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Skilled Nursing Facility at North Hill (the) 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Skilled Nursing Facility at North Hill (the) get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 18, 2025. The Massachusetts average is 6.8.
Has Skilled Nursing Facility at North Hill (the) been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $16,153 in the last three years.
Does Skilled Nursing Facility at North Hill (the) accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Skilled Nursing Facility at North Hill (the)?
CMS lists 58 owners and managers. Legal business name: NORTH HILL NEEDHAM, INC..

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection