Find a nursing home

Home / Oklahoma / Elk City

Elk City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

301 North Garrett, Elk City, OK 73644 · Beckham County · (580) 225-2811

118 certified beds, about 44 residents a day · For profit - Partnership · Medicare and Medicaid since 2004

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375479 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 1, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 11 health citations since February 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.27 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.27 of those hours.

40.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
6D
4E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
August 1, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. proper labeling/dating of stored bread, b. both the large and small ice machines were cleaned and free from debris, andc. hand hygiene was maintained during meal service to prevent cross contamination during kitchen observations. The DON identified 46 residents received food from the kitchen.
  2. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. a nebulizer mouthpiece was stored in a manner that promoted infection control practice for 1 (#3) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care, andb. clean linens were stored appropriately for 1 of 1 laundry room observation. The DON identified 47 residents resided in the facility and 16 residents received nebulizer treatments.
March 20, 2024Standard inspection · 9 citations
  1. F
    Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
    F642 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse coordinated and signed resident assessments prior to submission to CMS. The DON reported 51 residents resided in the facility.
  2. E
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to provide timely and complete beneficiary notices to three (#51, #16, #109) of three sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The Administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility.
  3. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to hospice, antipsychotic, anticoagulant, and opioid medications for two residents (#14 and #46) of 13 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The Administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility.
  4. E
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised after each assessment for two (#31 and #36) of 13 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility.
  5. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained infection control measures when passing medications. The Administrator identifed 51 residents resided in the facility.
  6. D
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the faciity failed to complete a significant change assessment for one (#57) of two sampled residents reviewed for a significant change.
  7. D
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure resident assessments was transmitted within seven days of completion for one (#44) of two sampled residents reviewed for resident assessments. The Administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility. Resident #44's quarterly assessment, dated 01/21/24, had been completed but still showed In Progress in the clinical health record. On 03/20/24 at 9:02 a.m., the MDS coordinator was asked why does the quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], still say In progress. They stated, I don't know might have missed it.
  8. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure neurological checks were accurately completed for one (#22) of two sampled residents reviewed for neurological checks. The Administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility.
  9. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 6, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure staff secured medication carts when unattended. The Administrator identified 51 residents resided in the facility.
February 2, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

2 fire safety citations on file: 2 on August 1, 2025.

Every fire safety citation2 citations
  1. F
    Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
    K 914 · August 1, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · August 1, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.273.793.86
Registered nurses0.270.340.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.733.443.42
Nurse aides3.11
Licensed practical nurses0.89
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)40.0%55.5%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported53.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 2.96 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.49 on weekdays and 3.73 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.36 in April to June 2025 to 4.27 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.270.274.493.73 0.0%0 of 9044
Oct to Dec 20254.200.274.443.59 0.0%0 of 9245
Jul to Sep 20254.200.254.463.53 0.0%0 of 9246
Apr to Jun 20254.360.274.593.79 0.0%0 of 9146
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 20263.790.323.943.422.2%1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Oklahoma

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Oklahoma, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$17.27$15.82 to $18.3919,410
LPNs and LVNs$28.04$24.06 to $29.8411,540
Registered nurses$39.87$37.19 to $47.5538,270
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Elk City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.513.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.61.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.82.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.34.73.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.613.714.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.64.74.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
25.617.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
18.827.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
16.016.612.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.72.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.73.01.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Elk City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (50.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

50.9% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 51 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

52.2% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

3.0% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: ELK CITY NURSING HOME LLC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Elk 421, LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization25%09/12/2014
David Braly Rev Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization50%09/12/2014
Maria Trapp-Braly Rev Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization50%09/12/2014
Dout, AlexanderCorporate officerIndividual04/30/2023
Fogle, KimberlyCorporate officerIndividual04/30/2023
Bank, DavidOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2017
Brimer, ArmeldiaOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2025
Glosser, PatriciaOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2022
Hennigh, CathyOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/01/2012
Hopper, DelaneeOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/29/2023
Jernigan, ZinaOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/29/2023
Leaper, RockyOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2022
White, CorrisaOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/01/2012
Braly, DavidIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual10/14/2025
Trapp, MariaIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual10/14/2025
Forvis Mazars LLPAdp of the SNFOrganization11/01/1996
Bank, DavidAdp of the SNFIndividual04/06/2017
Hennigh, CathyAdp of the SNFIndividual10/14/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 20, 2024: "Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 1, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on August 1, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on March 20, 2024: "Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered."

Other nursing homes nearby

Oklahoma contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Elk City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Elk City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Elk City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 1, 2025. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.
Has Elk City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Elk City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Elk City Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
CMS lists 18 owners and managers. Legal business name: ELK CITY NURSING HOME LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection