Find a nursing home

Home / North Dakota / Fargo

Fargo Elim Health Care Center

3534 University Drive S, Fargo, ND 58104 · Cass County · (701) 271-1862

88 certified beds, about 85 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2022

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 355129 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 1, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the North Dakota average is 5.6, the national average 9.2).

Of 14 health citations since December 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.12 hours per resident per day, against 4.42 across North Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.37 of those hours.

35.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Dakota average 48.8%).

CMS links it to Cassia, an affiliated group of 16 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
2E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 1, 2026Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. G
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 16, 2026
    Inspectors wrote1. Based on observation, record review, review of facility policies, and staff and hospice staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 1 supplemental resident (Resident #62) with uncontrolled pain under hospice care. Failure of staff to effectively assess and treat Resident #62's pain resulted in unnecessary pain and discomfort.
  2. F
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policies, confidential resident interviews, family, visitor and staff interview, the facility failed to provide necessary care in a manner that promotes, maintains, or enhances their quality of life for 16 of 35 sampled residents (Resident #67, A, B, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, L, M, N, O, P, and Q) requiring assistance with activities of daily living. Failure to assist dependent residents with toileting, answer call lights timely, and speak to residents in a dignified manner does not enhance the resident's quality of life and has the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial and personal dignity.
  3. E
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and family and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise care plans to reflect the residents' current status for 5 of 20 sampled residents (Residents #5, #11, #27, #38, and #58) care plans reviewed. Failure to update care plans limited the staff's ability to communicate needs and ensure continuity of care.
  4. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.20.1), and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 2 of 34 sampled residents (Resident #6 and #64). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status and may affect the accurate development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate toileting for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #4 and #67) who required staff assistance with toileting. Failure to provide toileting may result in a loss of dignity and placed the resident at risk for skin breakdown, decreased self-esteem, urinary tract infections, and falls and/or injuries.
  6. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to label medications in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#46) observed for eye drop administration. Failure to ensure appropriate labeling of medications placed resident(s) at risk for medication errors.
  7. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen environment for 1 of 1 kitchen. Failure to ensure cleanliness of the ventilation system above the grill and removal of ice buildup in the walk-in freezer has the potential for contamination of food and may result in a foodborne illness. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Food service areas shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner occurred on 03/12/26. This policy, dated 01/09/26, stated . Kitchen . surfaces not in contact with food shall be cleaned . enough to prevent the accumulation of grime. The initial observation of the kitchen, occurred on 03/09/26 at 12:35 p.m. with two dietary supervisors (#18 and #19) and showed the following: * An accumulation of grease and grime on the ventilation system above the grill. [...]
  8. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 2 of 8 sampled residents (Resident #64 and #86) observed during cares. Failure to practice infection control standards related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), catheters, glove use, and hand hygiene has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
February 20, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food is prepared in accordance with professional standards for food service sanitation in 1 of 1 kitchen. Failure to prepare food in a sanitary manner, such as not wearing beard restraints, may result in contamination of food served to residents, staff, and visitors.
  2. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.19.1), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 3 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #2, #19, and #40). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the accurate development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents.
December 20, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 24, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medications for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #29) observed with medications at bedside. Failure to evaluate the resident's ability to safely self-administer medications may result in medication errors and/or harm to the resident.
  2. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteThis citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective action implemented by the facility immediately following the incident. Based on information from the complainant, record review, review of professional reference, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to promptly notify the physician to maintain the resident's highest level of well-being for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #1) transferred to the emergency room (ER) for a change in health status. Failure to notify a provider of a residents change in condition and implement provider orders timely may have resulted in worsening respiratory symptoms and a delay in treatment.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteThis citation is considered past noncompliance based on review of the corrective action implemented by the facility immediately following the incident. Based on information from the complainant, record review, review of professional reference, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain the resident's highest level of well-being for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #23) transferred to the emergency room (ER) for a change in health status. Failure to implement provider orders timely may have resulted in worsening respiratory symptoms and a delay in treatment.
  4. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 24, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of the facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control practices for 3 of 18 sampled residents (Resident #7, #15, #47) observed during cares. Failure to follow infection control practices related to catheter cares, wound care, and wearing proper personal protective equipment (PPE) has the potential for the transmission of communicable diseases and infections to residents and staff.

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on February 20, 2025.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. E
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · February 20, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNorth DakotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.124.423.86
Registered nurses1.370.930.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.493.803.42
Nurse aides3.36
Licensed practical nurses0.39
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)35.0%48.8%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover35.7%40.3%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.38 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.37 on weekdays and 4.49 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.13 in April to June 2025 to 5.12 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.121.375.374.49 0.0%0 of 9085
Oct to Dec 20255.061.265.314.42 0.0%0 of 9285
Jul to Sep 20255.141.275.374.56 0.0%0 of 9284
Apr to Jun 20255.131.295.384.51 0.0%0 of 9186
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
North Dakota, Jan to Mar 20264.570.924.813.9611.7%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for North Dakota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
North Dakota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.03$17.51 to $23.066,840
LPNs and LVNs$29.95$28.03 to $31.261,920
Registered nurses$38.81$33.47 to $44.7511,340
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNorth DakotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
14.719.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.12.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.15.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.41.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.517.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.94.94.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.722.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.919.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
12.811.412.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.11.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.61.91.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: ELIM HOMES INC. CMS links this home to Cassia, a group of 16 nursing homes averaging 4.4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Elim Care Inc5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/29/1986
Anderson, PaulCorporate directorIndividual06/24/2021
Leff, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual05/18/2000
Nuss, PatrickCorporate directorIndividual05/19/2005
Tangedahl, GuyCorporate directorIndividual05/17/2012
Weber-Daniels, NicoletteCorporate directorIndividual06/24/2021
Dahl, RobertCorporate officerIndividual01/29/1986
Kern, MatthewCorporate officerIndividual02/28/2019
Youngquist, KathrynCorporate officerIndividual01/29/1986
CassiaOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2018
Muhonen, ReneeOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/15/2015

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 1, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 1, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 1, 2026: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 1, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."

Other nursing homes nearby

North Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in North Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Fargo Elim Health Care Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Fargo Elim Health Care Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Fargo Elim Health Care Center get at its last inspection?
8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 1, 2026. The North Dakota average is 5.6.
Has Fargo Elim Health Care Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Fargo Elim Health Care Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Fargo Elim Health Care Center?
CMS lists 11 owners and managers, and links the home to Cassia. Legal business name: ELIM HOMES INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection