Find a nursing home

Home / Mississippi / Lucedale

George Regional Health & Rehab Center

859 Winter St., Lucedale, MS 39452 · George County · (601) 947-9101

59 certified beds, about 38 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 2011

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
1 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 255333 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 1, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Mississippi average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).

None of its 21 health citations since December 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.20 hours per resident per day, against 4.18 across Mississippi and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.87 of those hours.

39.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Mississippi average 45.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
16D
1E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
2C
July 1, 2026Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to procure, store, and maintain food under sanitary conditions by failing to ensure opened food items were properly covered, labeled, dated, and discarded in accordance with facility policy and by failing to remove moldy and deteriorated fresh produce from refrigerated storage, with the potential to affect all residents who received food prepared by the dietary department.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    F565 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to resolve and provide follow-up regarding grievances brought forward by the Resident Council related to food quality and cleanliness of resident rooms for six (6) of (12) months of Resident Council meetings reviewed.
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the Resident's nutritional status by coding the resident as receiving tube feeding when the resident had no feeding tube, did not receive enteral nutrition during the assessment reference period, and had an active physician order for a regular diet, affecting one (1) of (16) residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. (Resident #24).
  4. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I screenings were completed accurately and residents received appropriate referral for PASRR Level II evaluation in accordance with PASRR requirements, affecting two (2) of (2) residents reviewed for PASRR requirements. (Residents #2 and #8). Findings Include:A review of the facility's policy, Resident Assessment- Coordination with PASARR program with revision date 10/30/25, revealed Policy: the facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder (MD), intellectual disability (ID), or related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. [...]
  5. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement individualized comprehensive care plan interventions that addressed residents' assessed needs and physician-prescribed treatment regiments, for three (3) of (16) residents reviewed for comprehensive care planning. (Residents #6, #7, and #55).
  6. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible by maintaining Resident #7's call light within reach, consistent with the resident's assessed fall risk, left-sided hemiplegia, need for assistance with mobility and toileting, and comprehensive care plan interventions, affecting one (1) of (16) residents reviewed for accident prevention. (Resident #7).
  7. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure required oxygen cautionary signage was posted for a resident receiving oxygen therapy, affecting one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident #12).
  8. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving psychotropic and high-risk medications, including anticoagulants, were monitored for potential adverse consequences in accordance with professional standards of practice and facility policy, affecting two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents #7 and #55).
May 1, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. D
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to privacy and confidentiality were maintained when personal care signage was posted on the wall for two (2) of three (3) survey days. Resident #10 and Resident #29. Findings Included: A review of the facility's policy, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, dated 10/10/24, revealed, It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity .Compliance Guidelines: . 12. Maintain resident privacy . A review of the facility's policy, Resident Rights, dated 2/10/25, revealed, . The facility will inform the resident .of his or her rights and all the regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility . Resident rights. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (5%) for four (4) of thirty-one (31) observed medication opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 12.9%.
  3. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to professional standards of practice by crushing and combining all medications into a single dose for administration via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube, without providing a rational for combining the medication or individualized resident needs, for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed with feeding tubes. (Residents #11).
  4. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection by not following manufacturer guidelines for cleaning and disinfecting the glucometer for one (1) of two (2) residents observed for blood glucose monitoring, Resident #95.
  5. C
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure daily nurse staffing information was posted in a visible and accessible location for two (2) of three (3) survey days.
December 20, 2023Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store foods safely as evidenced by food left open and exposed on shelves, undated/unlabeled foods without a use-by -date, food stored without an identifying label, and not discarding food items after their use-by or sell-by date for one (1) of two (2) kitchen observations. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Food and Supply Storage, review date 08/2021, revealed, All food, non-food items and supplies used in food preparation shall be stored in such a manner as to prevent contamination to maintain the safety and wholesomeness of the food for human consumption . Most products contain an expiration date. The words sell-by or use-by should precede the date . The sell-by, best-by or use-by date is the last date that a food can be consumed . [...]
  2. E
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    F867 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee failed to correct a quality deficiency from a previous survey for one (1) re-cited deficiency of five (5) cited deficiencies from a previous annual recertification survey in October 2021. The deficiency was related to initiating and implementing care plans. The facility's continued failure during two surveys shows a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective QAPI Committee. Findings Include: [...]
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete the Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for one (1) of 16 residents sampled. Resident # 6 Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled, MDS 3.0 Completion, reviewed/revised 10/02/23, revealed, Policy: Residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process, in order to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 2f. Discharge Assessment - completed using the discharge date as the ARD (Assessment Reference Date). Must be completed within 14 days of the discharge date /ARD . A record review of the facility's Face Sheet, revealed the facility admitted Resident #6 on 07/20/23, with diagnoses that included Essential Hypertension. [...]
  4. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident (Resident #21) who had an indwelling catheter and failed to implement comprehensive care plan interventions for medication administration (Resident #21) and toenail care (Resident #34) for two (2) of 16 resident care plans reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016, revealed, .A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timelines to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .8. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will .b. [...]
  5. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to obtain a resident's pulse before administering an antihypertensive medication for one (1) of four (4) medication administration observations. Resident #21 Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, Medication Administration, with a revision date of 2/2023, revealed Policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses .in accordance with professional standards of practice .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .8. Obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician orders. When applicable, hold medication for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters .Example guidelines for Medication Administration .Medication requiring vital signs prior to administration .Anti-Hypertensives . [...]
  6. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for a resident who was dependent upon staff for toenail care for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for ADL care.
  7. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the failed to ensure multidose insulin pens were dated when opened for six (6) of 19 diabetic residents who are prescribed multidose insulin pens. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, Labeling of Medication Containers, revised 4/2007, revealed, Policy Statement .All medications maintained in the facility shall be properly labeled in accordance with the current state and federal regulations .Policy Interpretation and Implementation .3. Labels for individual drug containers shall include all necessary information, such as .h. The expiration date when applicable; . On 12/18/23 at 3:30 PM, an observation of the 600 Hall medication cart, with Licensed Practical Nurse #2 (LPN), revealed an opened NovoLog FlexPen pre-filled multi-dose insulin pen with no date indicating when the pen was opened. [...]
  8. C
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the resident, or the Resident Representative (RR), written notification of a hospital transfer at the time of transfer for three (3) of three (3) sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. Resident #8, Resident #22, and Resident #24. Findings Include: Review of the facility's, Transfer or Discharge Notice revised December 2016 revealed Policy Statement: Our facility shall provide a resident and or the residents representative (sponsor) with a thirty (30)-day written notice of impending transfer or discharge. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. A resident and or his or her representative (sponsor) will be given 30-day advance notice of an impending transfer or discharge from our facility. 2. [...]

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMississippiUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.204.183.86
Registered nurses0.870.640.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.143.503.42
Nurse aides2.35
Licensed practical nurses1.99
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)39.6%45.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover12.5%38.5%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 2.98 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.63 on weekdays and 4.14 on weekends, 26% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 9.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.75 in April to June 2025 to 5.20 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.200.875.634.14 9.0%0 of 9038
Oct to Dec 20255.170.875.544.20 4.2%1 of 9236
Jul to Sep 20254.810.775.263.66 9.6%0 of 9242
Apr to Jun 20254.750.585.193.66 8.4%0 of 9142
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Mississippi, Jan to Mar 20264.090.604.353.446.2%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Mississippi

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Mississippi, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$15.15$14.19 to $16.9214,200
LPNs and LVNs$24.14$22.50 to $27.909,850
Registered nurses$37.06$31.22 to $40.6229,060
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMississippiUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.920.513.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.61.40.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.63.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.12.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.919.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.46.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
30.321.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
43.427.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
28.915.512.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.52.41.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
5.52.91.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: GEORGE REGIONAL HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
George County Hospital5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%04/01/2011
Lansdown, ChristopherContracted managing employeeIndividual01/01/2016
Mason, AngieW-2 managing employeeIndividual05/22/2019
Long Term Care Management LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization04/01/2011
Long Term Care Management LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/23/2025
Lansdown, ChristopherAdp of the SNFIndividual01/23/2025
Mason, AngieAdp of the SNFIndividual01/23/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on July 1, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  2. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 1, 2026: "Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 1, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 1, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

Other nursing homes nearby

Mississippi contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Mississippi. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is George Regional Health & Rehab Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates George Regional Health & Rehab Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did George Regional Health & Rehab Center get at its last inspection?
8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 1, 2026. The Mississippi average is 6.8.
Has George Regional Health & Rehab Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does George Regional Health & Rehab Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns George Regional Health & Rehab Center?
CMS lists 7 owners and managers. Legal business name: GEORGE REGIONAL HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection