Find a nursing home

Home / North Dakota / Oakes

Good Samaritan Society - Oakes

213 N 9th St., Oakes, ND 58474 · Dickey County · (701) 742-3274

46 certified beds, about 44 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991

CMS abuse icon: cited for abuse in a recent inspection Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 355095 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 7, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the North Dakota average is 5.6, the national average 9.2).

Of 19 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,281 in the last three years; the largest was $8,281, and the latest is dated October 15, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.23 hours per resident per day, against 4.42 across North Dakota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.80 of those hours.

50.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (North Dakota average 48.8%).

CMS links it to Good Samaritan Society, an affiliated group of 92 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
15D
1E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
June 18, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 9, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #2 and #4) observed during cares and transfers. Failure to practice infection control standards related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), glove use, cleaning/sanitizing surfaces, and catheter and perineal cares has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
January 7, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #4) on oxygen. Failure to clean personal fans does not provide a safe and clean environment and has the potential to place the residents at risk of illness.
  2. D
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #29) who received an as needed (PRN) psychotropic. Failure to limit PRN psychotropic use to 14 days unless reevaluated by a practitioner placed the resident at risk of receiving unnecessary medications, experiencing adverse drug effects, and possible chemical restraint.
  3. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #40) observed for insulin preparation and administration. Failure to properly prepare and prime an insulin pen may result in contamination of the pen and administration of an inaccurate dose of insulin.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide services to prevent skin breakdown and/or minimize the development of pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #2) with pressure ulcers. Failure to ensure the resident received treatments as ordered and reassess wounds in a timely manner may result in delayed healing of current pressure ulcers and/or the development of new pressure ulcers.
  5. D
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    F849 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the hospice agreement, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records contained the hospice election form for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #6) receiving hospice services. Failure to obtain the hospice election form limits staff's ability to ensure coordination of care between the facility and the hospice agency.
  6. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 26, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 3 of 14 sampled residents (Resident #4, #6, and #7) observed during cares. Failure to practice infection control standards related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), donning/doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE), and hand hygiene has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
October 15, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. J
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, staff interview, and review of a Vulnerable Adult Protective Services (VAPS) report, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from abuse for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) who experienced nonconsensual sexual contact. Failure to protect residents from sexual abuse placed all residents at risk for psychosocial harm, physical harm, and mental and emotional distress. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on the review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately following the incident. During the on-site complaint survey, the team consulted with the State Survey Agency (SSA) and determined an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation existed on 10/04/25 when Resident #1 entered Resident #2's room, kissed the resident, and laid on his bed. [...]
  2. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to report an incident of resident-to-resident sexual abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) who experienced nonconsensual sexual contact. Failure to report incidents of abuse may result in unwanted physical and/or sexual contact, fear, anxiety, and psychosocial harm.
July 7, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #2) with a pressure ulcer and 1 closed record (Resident #3). Failure to routinely assess and monitor progression of pressure ulcers has the potential to result in complications.
October 3, 2024Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. F
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    F725 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, confidential resident and family interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the residents' needs for 4 of 4 confidential residents (Resident A, B, C, and D) and family members (Family member #1 and #2). Failure to provide sufficient nursing staff may result in residents experiencing falls, poor hygiene, incontinence, and skin issues and may negatively affect the residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control practice for 4 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #17, #22, #32 and #39) and 5 supplemental residents (Resident #2, #6, #13, #21, and #31) observed during cares. Failure to follow infection control practices during resident cares related to hand hygiene, glove use, and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy and resident interview, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained, enhanced, and respected the resident's dignity and individuality for 1 of 1 confidential resident (Resident B) who voiced concerns regarding nighttime toileting preferences Failure to honor the resident's choice for toileting does not enhance the resident's quality of life and may result in decreased self-esteem, decreased quality of life, emotional harm and increased pain.
  4. D
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the resident or the resident's representative a written bed hold notice for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #35) reviewed for hospital transfers. Failure to provide a written copy of the bed hold notice does not allow the resident and/or their representative to make an informed decision regarding their rights.
  5. D
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #26) who experienced a significant change in status. Failure to determine the need for and complete a SCSA in response to a resident's decline limited the facility's ability to accurately assess the resident's status and identity and implement appropriate care approaches.
  6. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.18.11), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 3 of 12 sampled residents (Resident #25, #32, and #40). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents.
  7. D
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    F791 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of facility policy and resident interview, the facility failed to assist in obtaining dental services to meet the needs of 1 of 1 resident (Resident #3) with a lost bottom denture. Failure to promptly refer for dental services and/or assess the resident's ability to eat and drink adequately without a bottom denture may result in decreased intakes, unplanned weight loss, and choking.
  8. C
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the daily staffing information, review of the nurse schedule, and staff interview, the facility failed to post daily staffing data for all shifts on 9 of 11 days reviewed (September 22 - October 2, 2024). Failure to post accurate staffing data does not allow residents and visitors to be aware of the number of licensed and unlicensed staff on duty each shift.
January 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on information provided by the complainant, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #2) who experienced falls. Failure to provide supervision put the resident at risk of falls and/or injury.
September 20, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

11 fire safety citations on file: 3 on January 7, 2026, 3 on October 3, 2024, 5 on September 20, 2023.

Every fire safety citation11 citations
  1. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · January 7, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Meet requirements for sections of health care facilities separated by fire resistive construction.
    K 131 · January 7, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · January 7, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
    K 291 · September 20, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · September 20, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · September 20, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. D
    Have corridors or aisles that are unobstructed and are at least 8 feet in width.
    K 232 · September 20, 2023 · Waiver
  11. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · September 20, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
October 15, 2025Fine $8,281

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNorth DakotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.234.423.86
Registered nurses0.800.930.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.893.803.42
Nurse aides1.93
Licensed practical nurses0.50
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)50.0%48.8%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover25.0%40.3%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.31 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.37 on weekdays and 2.89 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.85 in April to June 2025 to 3.23 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.230.803.372.89 0.6%0 of 9044
Oct to Dec 20253.141.093.312.71 0.0%0 of 9244
Jul to Sep 20253.611.063.803.12 0.0%0 of 9242
Apr to Jun 20253.850.944.103.24 0.0%0 of 9142
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
North Dakota, Jan to Mar 20264.570.924.813.9611.7%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNorth DakotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.319.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.71.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.92.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.15.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.217.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.24.94.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
33.322.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
9.519.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
14.111.412.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.11.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
4.91.91.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY. CMS links this home to Good Samaritan Society, a group of 92 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Sanford5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2019
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2019
Mertz-Hack, TaraContracted managing employeeIndividual10/01/2023
Bergh, PatriciaW-2 managing employeeIndividual09/21/2020
Morrison, TonyW-2 managing employeeIndividual01/01/2019
Cain, JamesCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Dykhouse, DanaCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Engbrecht, WesleyCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gassen, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gulsvig, NeilCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Herseth Sandlin, StephanieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Lundeen, MarkCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Molbert, LaurisCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
North, AndrewCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Shulkin, DavidCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Teiken, BrentCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Ventling-Herrmann, MarnieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Fluit, JoelCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2022
Gassen, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual05/30/2024
Middleton, AimeeCorporate officerIndividual01/27/2022
Olson, NicholasCorporate officerIndividual04/08/2024
Rogers, MichaelCorporate officerIndividual06/13/2022
Schema, NathanCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2022

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 7, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 7, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
  4. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 7, 2026: "Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.89 hours per resident per day, below the North Dakota average of 3.80.

Other nursing homes nearby

North Dakota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in North Dakota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Good Samaritan Society - Oakes's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Good Samaritan Society - Oakes 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Good Samaritan Society - Oakes get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 7, 2026. The North Dakota average is 5.6.
Has Good Samaritan Society - Oakes been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,281 in the last three years.
Does Good Samaritan Society - Oakes accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Good Samaritan Society - Oakes?
CMS lists 23 owners and managers, and links the home to Good Samaritan Society. Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection