Find a nursing home

Home / Ohio / Wellston

Jenkins Care Community

142 Jenkins Memorial Road, Wellston, OH 45692 · Jackson County · (740) 384-2119

57 certified beds, about 44 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1979

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365431 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 6, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).

Of 23 health citations since November 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.95 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.41 of those hours.

26.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
18D
4E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
September 19, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure timely services were provided for a head injury as ordered by the physician, notification to the family of the incident, and ensure fall interventions in place. This affected one (Resident #22) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 44.
August 6, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer prevention precautions for Resident #206 identified as having a facility acquired deep tissue injury (DTI) (Purple or maroon area of discolored intact skin due to damage of underlying soft tissue. The area may be preceded by tissue that is painful, firm, mushy, boggy, warmer or cooler as compared to adjacent tissue). This affected one ( Resident #206) of three residents reviewed for skin impairment. The facility census was 43.
  2. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record affecting Resident #206. This affected one (Resident #206) of nine resident medical record reviews. The facility census was 43.
February 6, 2025Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. D
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on closed record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an appropriate transfer notice with Ombudsman notifications to either the resident or designated representative. This affected one resident (Resident #5) out of three residents reviewed for facility discharge. The facility census was 40.
  2. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for Resident #7 and failed to ensure the admission PASARR was completed accurately for Resident #31. This affected two (Resident #7 and Resident #31) of four residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 40.
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to invite Resident #31 to attend quarterly care conferences. This affected one resident of 12 reviewed for care planning and care conference. The facility census was 40.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an ordered psychiatric consult following a gradual dose reduction (GDR) recommendation. This affected one (Resident #35) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 40.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent the worsening of contracture's were implemented. This affected one resident (#7) out of the two residents reviewed for limited range of motion during the annual survey. The facility census was 40.
  6. D
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    F699 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was appropriately assessed to identify causes and triggers for trauma. This affected one resident (#7) reviewed for PTSD during the annual survey. The facility identified one resident having a diagnosis of PTSD. The facility census was 40.
  7. D
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    F757 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure parameters for the monitoring and reporting of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) were in place. This affected one resident (#31) out of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the annual survey. The facility census was 40.
  8. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #25 had the appropriate diagnosis for an antipsychotic medication. This affected one (Resident #25) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 40.
December 26, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview, review of the facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), and policy review, the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for one resident (#10) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 48.
August 11, 2022Standard inspection · 0 citations
November 15, 2019Standard inspection · 11 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the medical record, facility investigation, staff statements, facility Fall Risk Assessment/Reassessment and Prevention policy and staff interview the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #20) was provided assistance with bed mobility by two staff members, as assessed, during incontinence care. Actual Harm occurred when one staff member provided incontinence care to Resident #20 resulting in the resident falling from the bed and sustaining an acute impacted left femoral intertrochanteric fracture (occur when a force presses against both ends of the femur at the femoral neck, pushing the broken ends of the bone together) and unspecified fracture of the lower end of the right femur requiring surgical repair. [...]
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed ensure residents who resided on the secured dementia unit were provided the necessary utensils to assist with independent meal consumption resulting in a potential undignified dining experience for the residents on the unit. This affected 13 residents (#20, #39, #22, #7, #17, #31, #15, #44, #13, #29, #2, #38 and #21) 13 residents who resided on the secured dementia unit. The facility census was 57. Findings Include: On 11/12/19 at 11:34 A.M. observation of the lunch meal revealed Resident #20, #39, #22, #7, #17, #31, #15, #44, #13, #29, #2, #38 and #21 were served only a spoon and a fork with their meal. The residents were not provided with a knife. At 12:00 P.M. State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #189 was observed to cut Resident #39's hamburger in half using a fork and a spoon. [...]
  3. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2019
    Inspectors wrote3. Review of Resident # 17's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia without behavioral disturbance, senile dementia, major depression recurrent, anxiety disorder, macular degenerations, type two diabetes, femur fracture and peripheral vascular disease. Resident #17 resided on the secure care unit (SCU). Review of Resident #17's activity assessment, dated 07/07/15 revealed her past and present interests were card games, bingo, outdoors, television, music, religious, van outings, arts and crafts, reading, and discussion. Resident #17 wanted to walk and stay busy during the day. Record review revealed Resident #17 did not have a plan of care for activities. [...]
  4. E
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive activities program designed to meet the total care needs of all residents. This affected five residents (#15, #17, #20, #21 and #22) of nine sampled residents reviewed for activities. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident # 17's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia without behavioral disturbance, senile dementia, major depression recurrent, anxiety disorder, macular degenerations, type two diabetes, and femur fracture, and peripheral vascular disease. Resident #17 resided on the secure care unit (SCU). [...]
  5. E
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents had adequate indication for the use of psychotropic medications and/or failed to ensure the justified use of an as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication for greater than 14 days. This affected four residents (#21, #22, #31 and #197) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, delusional disorder, glaucoma, essential hypertension, abnormal weight loss, dementia with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, hypothyroidism and malignant neoplasm of female breast. [...]
  6. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for Resident #31 related to pain management, Resident #20 related to mobility devices and for Resident #197 related to Hospice services. This affected three residents (#31, #20 and #197) of 21 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, anorexia, mood disorder, hyperlipidemia, bradycardia, heart failure, osteoarthritis, essential hypertension, hypocalcemia, anemia and falls. Review of Resident #31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/14/19 revealed the resident's speech was clear, he usually understands, usually understood others, and his cognition was severely impaired. [...]
  7. D
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    F676 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #21 and Resident #22 were provided the necessary care and services to maintain the resident's dining ability, ability to eat independently. This affected two residents (#21 and #22) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Finds Include: 1. Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia, delusional disorder, glaucoma, essential hypertension, abnormal weight loss, dementia with behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, hypothyroidism,and malignant neoplasm of female breast. Review of Resident #21's plan of care, dated 02/20/19 revealed to assist her as needed with her activities of daily living. [...]
  8. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #15 and Resident #31, who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living received timely and adequate assistance with dressing and personal hygiene. This affected two residents (#15 and #31) of four reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/20/19 with the admitting diagnoses of anxiety, dementia and depression. Review of the resident's plan of care, dated 08/21/19 revealed the resident had a self-care performance deficit related to Alzheimer's disease progression. Interventions included to set-up supplies for care and assist with activities of daily living. [...]
  9. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #31's oxygen tubing and humidification/water bottle were dated. This affected one resident (#31) of one resident reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility identified seven residents received respiratory care. Findings Include: Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, anorexia, mood disorder, hyperlipidemia, bradycardia, heart failure, osteoarthritis, essential hypertension, hypocalcemia, anemia and falls. Review of Resident #31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/14/19 revealed the resident's speech was clear, he usually understands, usually understood others, and his cognition was severely impaired. Resident #31 did not reject care. [...]
  10. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to implement a comprehensive and individualized pain management program for Resident #31. This affected one resident (#31) of one resident reviewed for pain. Findings Include: Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, anorexia, mood disorder, hyperlipidemia, bradycardia, heart failure, osteoarthritis, essential hypertension, hypocalcemia, anemia and falls. Review of Resident #31's plan of care, dated 02/08/19 revealed it did not address non-verbal expressions of pain. Review of Resident #31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/14/19 revealed the resident's speech was clear, he usually understands, usually understood others, and his cognition was severely impaired. [...]
  11. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #197's medical record was accurate to reflect the discontinuation of Hospice services. This affected one resident (#197) of 24 residents whose medical records were reviewed. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #197 revealed an admission date of 11/01/19 with diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbances, hypertension and anxiety. Review of the progress notes for Resident #197 revealed multiple notes including notes on 11/12/19, and 11/13/19 revealing the resident was receiving Hospice services. Interview on 11/13/19 at 4:10 P.M. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #154 revealed Resident #197 was discharged from Hospice on 11/05/19. However, nursing staff continued to document the resident was receiving Hospice services after this date.

Fire safety inspections

9 fire safety citations on file: 4 on February 6, 2025, 3 on August 11, 2022, 2 on November 15, 2019.

Every fire safety citation9 citations
  1. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · February 6, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. E
    Ensure that corridors are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.
    K 362 · February 6, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · February 6, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · February 6, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Meet requirements for sections of health care facilities separated by fire resistive construction.
    K 131 · August 11, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · August 11, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · August 11, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · November 15, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Ensure operating rooms are properly protected and written records are maintained and available for inspection.
    K 913 · November 15, 2019 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOhioUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.953.693.86
Registered nurses0.410.640.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.493.283.42
Nurse aides2.17
Licensed practical nurses1.37
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)26.0%48.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover16.7%43.9%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.41 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.14 on weekdays and 3.49 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.73 in April to June 2025 to 3.95 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.950.414.143.49 0.0%1 of 9044
Oct to Dec 20253.900.394.103.40 0.0%1 of 9245
Jul to Sep 20253.930.424.143.42 0.0%1 of 9244
Apr to Jun 20253.730.423.883.35 0.0%2 of 9146
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Ohio, Jan to Mar 20263.640.603.803.244.6%0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOhioUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.65.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.20.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.90.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.23.23.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.56.114.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.63.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.38.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
27.824.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
23.312.912.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.01.71.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.91.81.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: JACKSON COUNTY HEALTH FACILITIES INC..

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Ervin, GregoryCorporate directorIndividual10/15/2002
Fulks, DanCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2024
Furbee, MicheleCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2024
Hayes, RonaldCorporate directorIndividual10/01/2003
Holzapfel, BonnieCorporate directorIndividual05/01/2017
Massie, MarthaCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2000
Potter, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual02/04/2013
Simmons, JeffCorporate directorIndividual06/01/2021
Nichols, DavidCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2001
Potter, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual02/04/2013
Potter, WilliamOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/04/2013
Juschka, DirkAdp of the SNFIndividual05/01/2022
Nichols, DavidAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/2001
Potter, WilliamAdp of the SNFIndividual02/03/2013

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 11 problems in this area, most recently on September 19, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on August 6, 2025: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 6, 2025: "Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 6, 2025: "Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights."

Other nursing homes nearby

Ohio contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Jenkins Care Community's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Jenkins Care Community 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Jenkins Care Community get at its last inspection?
8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 6, 2025. The Ohio average is 10.5.
Has Jenkins Care Community been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Jenkins Care Community accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Jenkins Care Community?
CMS lists 14 owners and managers. Legal business name: JACKSON COUNTY HEALTH FACILITIES INC..

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection