Find a nursing home

Home / Colorado / Englewood

Julia Temple Healthcare Center

3401 S Lafayette St., Englewood, CO 80113 · Arapahoe County · (303) 761-0075

128 certified beds, about 106 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 065322 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on December 10, 2024, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Colorado average is 8.7, the national average 9.2).

None of its 13 health citations since May 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.79 hours per resident per day, against 3.72 across Colorado and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.59 of those hours.

CMS links it to The Ensign Group, an affiliated group of 344 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
8D
4E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
December 10, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
  1. F
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    F881 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to establish an effective antibiotic stewardship program to monitor for antibiotic use for one (#40) of one resident reviewed for antibiotic use out of 51 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Have an effective antibiotic stewardship program by mapping infections timely; and, -Have an effective antibiotic stewardship program to ensure Resident #40 was not given an antibiotic unnecessarily.
  2. E
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    F676 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four (#366, #370, #27 and #43) of 12 residents out of 51 sample residents were provided the appropriate care and services of activities of daily living (ADL) to maintain or improve his or her abilities. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #366, Resident #370, Resident #27 and Resident #43 received cueing or assistance while eating.
  3. E
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement an activities program that met the interests of and supported the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for three residents (#79, #364 and #11) out of eight residents reviewed for activities of 51 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Establish activity preferences and meet the socialization needs of Resident #79 and Resident #364; and, -Invite Resident #11 to group activities and ensure accurate activity documentation.
  4. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the possible development and transmission of infectious diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff followed appropriate hand hygiene during resident care; -Ensure shared vital signs equipment was sanitized between use; and, -Ensure appropriate infection control standards were followed during meals.
  5. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#19 and #44) of four residents out of 51 sample residents had the right to a dignified existence. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #19 was provided dignity and privacy while removing medication patches; and, -Ensure Resident #44 was not placed in the hallway facing the wall by facility staff.
  6. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent abuse for one (#68) of three sample residents reviewed for abuse out of a sample of 51 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #22 was free from physical abuse from Resident #68.
  7. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure supervision and interventions to prevent accidents for one (#88) of twelve residents reviewed for accidents of 51 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented for Resident #88 who had experienced several falls.
  8. D
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    F660 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge plan for two (#362 and #466) of two residents reviewed for discharge planning out of 51 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #362 and #466 and/or their responsible party were apprised of their progress and discharge planning; and, -Ensure the discharge planning process was documented in the residents' electronic medical records (EMR).
  9. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#113) of one resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice out of 51 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide timely treatment when Resident #113 was experiencing several episodes of diarrhea.
July 27, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 18, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure one of three ice machines was clean and sanitary; and, -Ensure glassware was handled properly in two of four dining rooms.
  2. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 18, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide services for one (#3) out of 12 residents reviewed for professional standards of practice out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #3's vital signs were monitored prior to the administration of a blood pressure medication.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 18, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#52) of two residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #52's palm splint was in place as ordered by the physician to prevent skin breakdown.
  4. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 18, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for two (#20 and #76) of five reviewed for nutrition status out of 47 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure -Resident #76, who had a downward trending weight loss and was identified with pressure ulcers was provided nutritional interventions in a timely manner; and, -Resident #20 was identified with a continued weight loss and completed a timely quarterly nutrition assessment.
May 12, 2022Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeColoradoUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.793.723.86
Registered nurses0.590.820.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.343.293.42
Nurse aides2.64
Licensed practical nurses0.55
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)not reported47.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported44.6%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 3.68 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.97 on weekdays and 3.34 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.54 in April to June 2025 to 3.79 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.790.593.973.34 0.2%0 of 90106
Jul to Sep 20253.590.593.793.08 0.0%0 of 92112
Apr to Jun 20253.540.633.753.02 0.0%0 of 91114
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Colorado, Jan to Mar 20263.590.763.753.185.9%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeColoradoUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.413.413.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.20.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.81.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.33.43.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.01.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.213.314.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.73.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
19.620.015.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
22.420.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
10.712.112.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.71.41.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.51.71.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CHATEAU JULIA HEALTHCARE, INC.. CMS links this home to The Ensign Group, a group of 344 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Boyles, EddyManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/20/2010
Gahm, GregoryManaging control - governing bodyIndividual10/01/2024
Jorgensen, DavidCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2024
Burnam, SoonCorporate officerIndividual01/14/2013
Dunyon, DavidCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2024
Keetch, ChadCorporate officerIndividual03/01/2011
Sato, AmiCorporate officerIndividual09/09/2024
Boyles, EddyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/20/2010
Gahm, GregoryOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2024
Port, BarryIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual07/09/2025
Caretrust Gp LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/01/2009
Caretrust Reit IncAdp of the SNFOrganization02/01/2009
Ctr Partnership LPAdp of the SNFOrganization02/01/2009
Ensign Services IncAdp of the SNFOrganization02/01/2009
Lafayette Health Holdings LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/01/2009
Boyles, EddyAdp of the SNFIndividual07/09/2025
Burnam, SoonAdp of the SNFIndividual07/09/2025
Gahm, GregoryAdp of the SNFIndividual07/09/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on December 10, 2024: "Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 10, 2024: "Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 10, 2024: "Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on December 10, 2024: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."

Other nursing homes nearby

Colorado contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Colorado. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Julia Temple Healthcare Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Julia Temple Healthcare Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Julia Temple Healthcare Center get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 10, 2024. The Colorado average is 8.7.
Has Julia Temple Healthcare Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Julia Temple Healthcare Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Julia Temple Healthcare Center?
CMS lists 18 owners and managers, and links the home to The Ensign Group. Legal business name: CHATEAU JULIA HEALTHCARE, INC..

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection