Kruse Village Senior Living Community
1700 E Stone St., Brenham, TX 77833 · Washington County · (979) 830-1996
65 certified beds, about 52 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2000
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675837 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 7, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 21 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.83 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.56 of those hours.
55.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Health Dimensions Group, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
May 7, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, and distribute food under sanitary conditions in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide C used proper hand hygiene between tasks on 05/05/2026. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed ensure the comprehensive care plan, consistent with resident rights, included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of five residents (Resident #41) reviewed for care plans completion. The facility failed to ensure Resident #41's care plan was completed to reflect Resident #41 had a pacemaker. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their medical needs.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure that nursing staff ensured the pacemaker was being transmitted on Resident #41. This failure could place residents at risk for not being provided the care and treatment to meet their needs.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for two of four residents reviewed for catheter care (Resident #5). The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's catheter was secured to his body with a catheter secure device per the care plan and physician's orders. This failure to secure catheters placed residents with urinary catheters at risk for traumatic removal and catheter acquired infections.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 3 medication carts (Medication Cart #1) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Medication Cart #1 was locked and medications were secured. This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to prescriptions, biologicals, and over-the counter medications.
June 3, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were given the appropriate services to maintain activities of daily living (ADLs) for three of six (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) residents. 1. Resident #1 had a soiled and stained top. 2. Resident #2 had soiled pants and unwanted facial hairs. 3. Resident # 3 had crumbs on the top of her blanket, unwanted facial hair, and had a brown substance under her fingernails. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of embarrassment and placing them at risk for social isolation, loss of dignity and self-worth.
March 11, 2025Standard inspection · 8 citations
- E Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed, to provide an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for residents residing on four of four halls. The facility failed to provide activities on the weekends for the months of February and March of 2025. This failure placed residents at risk for boredom, depression, increased behaviors, and diminished quality of life.
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drug and biological) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #14 and Resident #29) reviewed for medications and pharmacy services, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14's physician ordered medication Calcium and Gabapentin were available for administration. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29's physician ordered medication Saccharomyces Baulardii (probiotic) was available for administration. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not receiving therapeutic dosage of medications and symptomatic changes in vital signs.
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 11.54% based on 3 out of 26 opportunities, which involved 2 of 4 residents (Resident #14 and Resident #29) and 1 of 1 MA's (MA E) observed during medication administration reviewed for medication error. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14's physician ordered medication Calcium and Gabapentin was available for administration. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29's physician orders medication Saccharomyces Baulardii (probiotic) was available for administration. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of not receiving therapeutic dosage of medications and symptomatic changes in vital signs.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen and food sanitation. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] J wore gloves and used proper hand hygiene while preparing purée food for residents on 03/10/2025. The facility failed to ensure Culinary Aide I wore gloves while preparing a cake on 03/11/2025. These failures could have placed residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of five residents (Resident #15) reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure LVN D followed standard precautions during wound care on 03/10/2025 for Resident #15's Stage III pressure ulcer to her sacrum, when she failed to set up a clean wound dressing field without cross contamination and failed to use a cleaning technique on the pressure ulcer that did not cross contaminate the pressure ulcer or prevent the pressure ulcer once cleaned from becoming re-contaminated. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 (Resident #160) of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to cover Resident #160's catheter bag during therapy in the rehabilitation unit. This failure placed residents at risk of loss of dignity, embarrassment, and diminished quality of life.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care, consistent with professional standards of care to prevent development or worsening of pressure ulcers for one of three residents (Resident #15) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure LVN D followed standard precautions during wound care on 03/10/2025 for Resident #15's Stage III pressure ulcer to her sacrum, when she failed to set up a clean wound dressing field without cross contamination and failed to use a cleaning technique on the pressure ulcer that did not cross contaminate the pressure ulcer or prevent the pressure ulcer once cleaned from becoming re-contaminated. This failure could place residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers leading to discomfort, pain, and potential infections.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents who are incontinent of bladder receive appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for two ( Resident #7 and Resident #160) of seven residents reviewed for catheters. The facility failed to prevent Resident #7's and Resident #160's catheter bag/tubing from touching the floor on 03/09/2025. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and urinary tract infections.
March 26, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for 5 of 6 Resident' beds (Residents # 1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) observed for bed linens and failed to have clean towels and top sheets available in one of one rehabilitation units. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5's beds had a top sheet. The facility failed to ensure there were clean towels and top sheets available in the Rehabilitation unit. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an un-homelike environment.
January 31, 2024Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs 3 of 7 residents (Residents #39, #44, and #47) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility did not have appropriate indications for medications based on Resident #39's diagnoses. The facility did not have parameters to hold blood pressure medication for Resident #39. The facility did not hold blood pressure medications for Residents #44 and #47 when the residents' blood pressure or pulse was outside parameters set by their physician. These failures could place residents at risk of complications related to receiving unnecessary medications.
- E Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for 1 of 1 facility kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to designate a person to serve as the dietary manager who met the required qualifications. The facility designated Dietary Supervisor did not have a dietary manager's certification or any other qualifying credentials. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of foodborne illness and residents not having their nutritional needs met.
- D Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for 1 of 10 dietary staff (Dietary Aide B) reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide B had a current Food Handler's Certificate while working in the facility's kitchen. This failure could place residents who consumed food prepared in the facility kitchen at risk of foodborne illness due to being served by improperly trained staff.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide liquids consistent to meet the residents' needs, for one (Resident #43) of 16 residents reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility did not serve Resident #43 nectar thickened coffee or juice during his breakfast meal on 01/29/24. This failure could place residents who have dysphagia at risk for aspiration.
- D Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided the therapeutic diets as prescribed by the attending physician for 2 of 16 residents (Residents #18 and #40) reviewed for therapeutic dietsfood and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure Residents #18 and #40 did not received their health shake with the lunch meal on 01/29/24 as ordered by physician. This failure could place residents with diet needs at risk for a decrease in calories and potential weight loss.
October 4, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who displayed or was diagnosed with dementia received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, for one1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for treatment and services. The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident #1's continuous intermittent aggressive behaviors toward male residents. This failure placed residents at risk for their medical, physical, and psychological needs not being met.
Fire safety inspections
6 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 7, 2026, 4 on January 31, 2024.
Every fire safety citation6 citations
- F Have exits that are accessible at all times.
- C Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.83 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.56 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.48 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.52 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.75 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 55.2% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 62.5% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.34 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.98 on weekdays and 3.48 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 4.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.59 in April to June 2025 to 3.83 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.83 | 0.56 | 3.98 | 3.48 | 4.0% | 0 of 90 | 52 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.92 | 0.63 | 4.07 | 3.55 | 4.2% | 0 of 92 | 52 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.75 | 0.69 | 3.90 | 3.36 | 1.1% | 0 of 92 | 49 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.59 | 0.50 | 3.73 | 3.25 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 53 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.8 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.8 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.2 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 32.6 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.5 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: KRUSE VILLAGE LLC. CMS links this home to Health Dimensions Group, a group of 10 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions Health Strategies Corporation | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 12/02/2016 | |
| Hennessey, Erin | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Rogotzke, Amber | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Hennessey, Erin | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Rogotzke, Amber | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Dimensions Health Strategies Corporation | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/02/2016 | |
| Health Dimensions Consulting Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/02/2016 | |
| Briscoe, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Briscoe, Patricia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Hennessey, Erin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Rogotzke, Amber | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Shvetzoff, Sergei | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Shvetzoff, Tami | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2020 | |
| Health Dimensions Consulting Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/06/2025 | |
| Obakpolor, Osahon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on May 7, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on May 7, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 7, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 11, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
Other nursing homes nearby
- High Hope Care Center of Brenham Brenham, 1.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Brenham Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Brenham, 2.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Avir at Bellville Bellville, 15.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Navasota Nursing & Rehabilitation Navasota, 24.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 50 citations
- Golden Creek Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Navasota, 24.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 18 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Kruse Village Senior Living Community's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Kruse Village Senior Living Community 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Kruse Village Senior Living Community get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 7, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Kruse Village Senior Living Community been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Kruse Village Senior Living Community accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Kruse Village Senior Living Community?
- CMS lists 15 owners and managers, and links the home to Health Dimensions Group. Legal business name: KRUSE VILLAGE LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.