Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Cape Girardeau

Lutheran Home, the

2825 Bloomfield Road, Cape Girardeau, MO 63703 · Cape Girardeau County · (573) 335-0158

274 certified beds, about 176 residents a day · Non profit - Other · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989

CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265359 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 10, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 9 health citations since February 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.54 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.64 of those hours.

34.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 9 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
7D
1E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 10, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    F568 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system to safeguard resident trust petty cash by commingling money from other sources with resident trust petty cash and by failing to reconcile the resident trust petty cash account. This had the potential to affect all residents whose funds were maintained by the facility. The facility census was 181. The facility did not provide a policy regarding the management, reconciliation, and safeguarding of resident trust petty cash. Observation of the resident petty cash box count and review of the petty cash log on 07/10/26 at 11:15 A.M., showed:- Administrative Assistant E counted $474.50 in resident trust petty cash. The petty cash log showed receipts totaling $435.38. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility) assessments accurately reflected residents' clinical status for two (Residents #12 and #18) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility inaccurately coded Resident #12 as receiving hospice services when the resident was not enrolled in hospice and inaccurately coded Resident #18 as receiving insulin during the MDS look-back period when no insulin was administered. These inaccurate assessments had the potential to affect resident care planning, quality measures, and the accuracy of federally required resident assessment data. The facility census was 181. The facility did not provide a policy for MDS accuracy. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated October 2025, showed: [...]
  3. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders by failing to administer a physician-ordered as needed (PRN) antihypertensive medication when the systolic blood pressure (SBP - top number. Normal range: 90-120) exceeded the ordered treatment parameter of greater than 160 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) for one resident (Resident #173) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 181. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Transcription, undated, showed:- PRN ordered medications are administered only as needed according to a designated time frame identified in the order;- The licensed nurse assesses the resident and makes the decision when to administer the PRN medication. 1. [...]
  4. D
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    F699 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized, person-centered care plan to address post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it; symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares, and severe anxiety, as well as uncontrollable thoughts about the event) triggers and interventions for one (Resident #7) of three sampled residents reviewed for behavioral health. Although the resident had a diagnosis of PTSD, documented trauma history, and identified individualized triggers and care preferences, the facility failed to identify those triggers or interventions on the resident's care plan. As a result, staff lacked guidance to consistently provide trauma-informed care and reduce the risk of triggering the resident's PTSD symptoms. [...]
March 28, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to document an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) for one resident (Resident #76) out of 32 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #170) outside the sample. The facility's census was 163. The facility did not provide a policy. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) version 3.0 Manual showed: - Section O0110K1, Hospice care: Code residents identified as being in a hospice program for terminally ill persons where an array of services is provided for the palliation and management of terminal illness and related conditions; - Section J1400: Code 1, yes: if the medical record includes physician documentation: 1) that the resident is terminally ill; or 2) the resident is receiving hospice services; [...]
  2. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 21, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices when staff failed to perform hand hygiene during perineal care (peri care - cleaning the genital and anal area) and catheter (a tube that is inserted into the bladder, allowing urine to drain freely) care for one resident (Resident #67) out of 32 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #15) outside the sample. The facility also failed to wear proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) during care for two residents (Resident #100 and #131) out of 32 sampled residents. The facility's census was 163. Review of the facility's policy, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, undated, showed: - The facility recognizes that handwashing is the most effective measure for the prevention of infection and cross-contamination. [...]
February 9, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 168. Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning and Sanitation of Dining and Food Service Areas, dated 11/14/23, showed: - The dining service staff will maintain the cleanliness and sanitation of the dining and food service areas through compliance with a written, comprehensive cleaning schedule; - The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM)/dining service director/kitchen manager/designee will record all cleaning and sanitation tasks for the department; - All staff will be trained on the frequency of cleaning necessary; [...]
  2. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). There were 29 opportunities with two errors made, resulting in an error rate of 6.9% for two residents (Resident #49 and #105) out of six sampled residents. The facility's census was 168. Review of the Humalog/lispro (a rapid insulin injected just below the skin that helps lower mealtime blood sugar spikes) Flex Pen (Insulin in a pen-type device) instructions, revised, July 2023, showed: - Remove cap; - Attach needle; - Prime pen by turning dose selector to two units; - Hold pen with needle pointing up, press and hold button until it stops and the zero is seen in the dose window along with visible insulin at the tip of the needle; - Select the dose; - Give the injection after selecting the area and cleaning the site with an alcohol swab. [...]
  3. D
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the dumpsters were closed at all times and maintained to keep pest out and/or to keep the garbage contained in the dumpster. The facility census was 168. The facility did not provide a policy regarding the dumpsters. Observations on 02/06/24 at 10:30 A.M., and 02/06/24 at 3:01 P.M., of the outside 200 Hall kitchen showed a two-lid dumpster with both lids opened with visible trash bags and other miscellaneous items. Observations on 02/06/24 at 10:54 A.M., and 02/06/24 at 3:18 P.M., of the outside 300 Hall kitchen, showed a two-lid dumpster with both lids opened with visible trash bags and other miscellaneous items. Observation on 02/07/24 at 10:01 A.M., of the outside 300 Hall kitchen showed a two-lid dumpster with one lid opened with visible trash bags and several broken down cardboard boxes. [...]

Fire safety inspections

3 fire safety citations on file: 2 on July 10, 2026, 1 on March 28, 2025.

Every fire safety citation3 citations
  1. D
    Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
    K 781 · July 10, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · July 10, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · March 28, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.543.433.86
Registered nurses0.640.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.153.013.42
Nurse aides2.89
Licensed practical nurses1.01
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)34.9%56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover33.3%47.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.62 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.69 on weekdays and 4.15 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.46 in April to June 2025 to 4.54 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.540.644.694.15 0.0%0 of 90176
Oct to Dec 20254.620.704.784.23 0.0%0 of 92172
Jul to Sep 20254.600.734.774.16 0.0%0 of 92169
Apr to Jun 20254.460.694.624.06 0.0%0 of 91165
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.918.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.31.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.92.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.84.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.82.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.617.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.44.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.823.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
25.626.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
9.813.712.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.42.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.72.31.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: LUTHERAN HOME FOR THE AGED.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Brown, TeresaW-2 managing employeeIndividual05/11/2015
Payne, JackieW-2 managing employeeIndividual04/26/2018
Freeze, JohnCorporate directorIndividual03/18/2012
Goodman, CathyCorporate directorIndividual07/24/2013
Hale, HaroldCorporate directorIndividual12/17/2012
Kasten, MarkCorporate directorIndividual04/01/2004
Meyr, RexCorporate directorIndividual04/01/1997
Schnieder, SteveCorporate directorIndividual12/22/2014
Brown, TeresaCorporate officerIndividual05/11/2015
Meyr, RexCorporate officerIndividual04/01/1997
Payne, JackieCorporate officerIndividual04/26/2018

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 10, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 9, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on July 10, 2026: "Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on July 10, 2026: "Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent."

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Lutheran Home, the's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Lutheran Home, the 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Lutheran Home, the get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 10, 2026. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Lutheran Home, the been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Lutheran Home, the accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Lutheran Home, the?
CMS lists 11 owners and managers. Legal business name: LUTHERAN HOME FOR THE AGED.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection