Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Odessa

Madison Medical Resort

5001 Office Park Drive, Odessa, TX 79762 · Ector County · (432) 362-1800

124 certified beds, about 110 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2013

Inside a hospital Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676348 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 2, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 11 health citations since December 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $32,445 in the last three years; the largest was $32,445, and the latest is dated February 1, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.57 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.28 of those hours.

44.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Foursquare Healthcare, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
2K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
4D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 23, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    F693 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by eternal means received the appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and to prevent complications of eternal feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers for 3 of 5 residents (Residents #3, #9 and #10) reviewed for PEG tube feeding. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's enteral feedings bag was correctly dated when it was changed on 07/21/2026 at 9:07 a.m. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was in a proper position while on continuous enteral formula to mitigate the potential for aspiration on 07/21/2026 at 9:21 a.m. and 07/22/2026 at 1:35 a.m. 3. [...]
  2. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 31, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to, in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for the incident and if the alleged violation was verified appropriate corrective action was taken for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate a self-reported incident with an allegation of resident abuse for Resident #1 who alleged CNA A hit his foot during incontinent care on 04/23/2026. 2. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate a self-reported incident with an allegation of resident neglect for Resident #2 who notified RN B that CNA A allegedly had left him soiled on the toilet, on 05/26/2026. [...]
April 2, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 2, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 10 of 10 (Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #12, Resident #44, and Resident #58, Resident #61, Resident #65, Resident #100, Resident #113, Resident #133) residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. 1. [...]
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 2, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure floors were not soiled with food, grease, dust, and other dried substances. The facility failed to ensure floors in the walk-in refrigerator/freezer were not soiled with pieces of brown and clear plastic wrappers as well as dust buildup. The facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator were not opened to air. The facility failed to ensure food items were stored properly per the manufacturer. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness and a decline in health status.
January 30, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #55, Resident #207) of 6 residents reviewed for incontinent care and transfers in that 1. CNA D and CNA E failed to comply with enhanced barrier precaution regulations during incontinent care for Resident #55. 2. CNA B and CNA C failed to comply with enhanced barrier precaution regulations during a transfer for Resident #207. These failures could place resident's risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection.
  2. D
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have a right to personal privacy for 1 of 3 resident (Resident #11) reviewed for privacy, in that: CNA A did not close Resident #11's window blinds while providing incontinent care for the resident. This deficient practice could place residents who received perineal care at risk of loss of dignity due to lack of privacy.
  3. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (Residents #61 and #253) of 4 residents observed for oxygen management. The facility failed to ensure Oxygen (O2) in use signage was on the doorways of Resident #61 and Resident #253. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate respiratory care .
February 1, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. K
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 6 (Residents #1, 11, 6, 8, 10, and 7) of 6 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included transfer goals and interventions for Residents #1, 11, 6, 8, 10, and 7. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 01/31/24. The IJ template was provided to the Administrator. The IJ was removed on 02/01/24, but the facility remained out of compliance. [...]
  2. K
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were provided supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 6 of 6 (Residents #1, 11, 6, 8, 10, and 7) residents reviewed for accidents. The facility allowed CNAs to determine the amount of assistance to provide to each resident and determine if they could transfer residents alone or ask for assistance. Resident #1 had a fall on 12/7/23 during transfer and was injured with acute fracture of the surgical neck of the left humerus. Resident #11 had slipped and landed on floor on 12/12/23 during a transfer with no injuries. This failure resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 01/31/24. The IJ template was provided to the Administrator. The IJ was removed on 02/01/24, but the facility remained out of compliance. [...]
December 6, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #2, and #68 ) reviewed for accidents and hazards in that: CNA B, CNA C, and CNA D failed to lock Resident #2 and Resident #68's wheelchair during transfers. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for avoidable injuries during transfers.
  2. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 1 treatment cart reviewed for medication storage and security. The facility staff failed to ensure the treatment cart was secured when it was left unattended and unsupervised. These failures could place clients at risk for drug diversion or accidental ingestion.

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
February 1, 2024Fine $32,445

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.573.393.86
Registered nurses0.280.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.992.983.42
Nurse aides2.13
Licensed practical nurses1.16
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)44.8%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover40.0%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 5.36 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.80 on weekdays and 2.99 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.27 in April to June 2025 to 3.57 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.570.283.802.99 0.0%0 of 90110
Oct to Dec 20253.360.213.552.89 0.0%0 of 92112
Jul to Sep 20253.380.263.592.85 0.0%0 of 92117
Apr to Jun 20253.270.303.482.74 0.0%0 of 91120
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.915.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.90.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.30.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.13.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.11.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
23.314.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.43.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.69.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
30.225.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
9.912.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.62.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.42.11.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: MIDLAND COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Foursquare Healthcare, a group of 10 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Campbell Gs-Trust5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization11/01/2024
Fairbrook Partners, LP5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization11/01/2024
Jem 5x5 Trust5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization11/01/2024
Miller Gs- Trust5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization11/01/2024
Montague Nh, LP5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization11/01/2024
Odessa Nh Realty, Ltd5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization11/01/2024
Sdl Gs 5x5 Trust5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization11/01/2024
Campbell, William5% or greater mortgage interestIndividual11/01/2024
Miller, Don5% or greater mortgage interestIndividual11/01/2024
Miller, John5% or greater mortgage interestIndividual11/01/2024
Bowerman, StephenCorporate officerIndividual11/01/2024
David W Miller Gs TrustOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/17/2024
Jec Gs TrustOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/17/2024
John E Miller Gs TrustOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/17/2024
Kingsbury Capital LLC Series FOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/17/2024
Kjc Gs TrustOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/17/2024
Lion Plaza LPOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/17/2024
Mnh-Inv Series LLC Series DOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/17/2024
Richard M Miller Gs TrustOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/17/2024
Uptown Fs LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/17/2024
Campbell, JohnOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2024
Campbell, KennethOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2024
Lewis, ShaneOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2024
Miller, DavidOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2024
Miller, JohnOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2024
Miller, RichardOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/01/2024
Campbell Gs-TrustAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2025
Fairbrook Partners, LPAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2025
Jem 5x5 TrustAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2025
Miller Gs- TrustAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2025
Montague Nh, LPAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2025
Odessa Nh Realty, LtdAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2025
Sdl Gs 5x5 TrustAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2025
Uptown Fs LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/15/2025
Green, WilliamAdp of the SNFIndividual11/01/2024
Slaughter, PaulAdp of the SNFIndividual01/15/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 23, 2026: "Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 2, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  3. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on July 23, 2026: "Respond appropriately to all alleged violations."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on April 2, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Madison Medical Resort's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Madison Medical Resort 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Madison Medical Resort get at its last inspection?
2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 2, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Madison Medical Resort been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $32,445 in the last three years.
Does Madison Medical Resort accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Madison Medical Resort?
CMS lists 36 owners and managers, and links the home to Foursquare Healthcare. Legal business name: MIDLAND COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection