395 Interstate Drive, Manchester, TN 37355 · Coffee County · (931) 723-8744
120 certified beds, about 106 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1997
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 445391 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 3, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Tennessee average is 4.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 12 health citations since August 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.27 hours per resident per day, against 3.80 across Tennessee and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.47 of those hours.
52.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Tennessee average 48.9%).
CMS links it to Carerite Centers, an affiliated group of 34 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 12 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to perform an assessment for the use of a seatbelt for 2 residents (Resident #34 and #67) of 3 residents reviewed for physical restraints.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement the care plan for the use of a lap belt for 2 residents (Resident #34 and #67) and for falls for 1 resident (Resident #107) of 15 residents reviewed for care plans.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 resident (Resident #107) of 15 residents reviewed for care plans.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices during medication administration for 1 resident (Resident #18) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on job description review, facility policy review, facility investigation documentation review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident #1) was returned to her room after transportation to a medical appointment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failure occurred on 5/8/2024 when Resident #1 was taken to a medical appointment by the Transportation Coordinator and returned to the facility at approximately 4:30 PM. The facility was under a code black at the time for serious weather conditions. The Transportation Coordinator failed to unload Resident #1 from the facility van and Resident #1 was locked inside the facility van for an unknown amount of time, estimated to be 3 to 4 hours. [...]
Inspectors wroteFACILITY Kitchen 12/06/22 11:10 AM Steam table set up in dining room, vertical barrier hung between food station and the rest of dining room, as ceiling was being worked on. 12/06/22 09:58 AM Observation of plating station showed dining area back to normal, with no repairs being done and barrier gone. 12/07/22 8:30 AM Observation of kitchen workers showed appropriate hand sanitation and hair nets in place. During an interview on 12/5/22 at 8:42 AM, [NAME] O'Keefe, Dietary Manager the facility has a full-time qualified with ServSafe Certification that expires 5/18/23, with 14 years experience in healthcare foodservice. Menu was reviewed and the mechanical consistency of the meal is followed per orders from Speech therapy, RD and physician. Alternatives are offered for any meal. Copy of menu reviewed with DM. A tour of the kitchen followed. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, the facility's documentation, and interviews, the facility failed to provide evidence that the allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 2 residents (Residents #40 and #96) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteResident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dementia, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Schizophrenia, Morbid Obesity, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. The diagnosis of Impulse Disorder was added on 9/19/2019 and the diagnosis of Psychotic Disorder was added 10/12/2021. Review of a PASARR dated 6/11/2012 showed a level 1 PASARR was completed and included the diagnosis of Schizophrenia. Resident #21 was not referred for level 2 services due to the resident not requiring specialized services. Review of the medical record showed a new PASARR had not been submitted to the stated designated authority after the diagnosis of Impulse Disorder was added on 9/19/2019 or the diagnosis of Psychotic Disorder was added on 10/12/2021. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices were maintained for 1 resident (#115) of 5 residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions which had the potential to affect 11 of 116 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, grievance report review, and interviews, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse for 1 resident (#33) of 24 residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, medical record review, grievance report review, and interviews, the facility failed to initiate an immediate investigation of an allegation of abuse for 1 resident (#33) of 24 residents reviewed for abuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to perform proper hand hygiene after providing direct resident care for 1 resident (#32) of 3 residents during resident care of 17 sampled residents.
5 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 3, 2026, 3 on December 7, 2022, 1 on August 7, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Tennessee | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.27 | 3.80 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.47 | 0.60 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.30 | 3.31 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.41 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.39 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 52.9% | 48.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 52.6% | 43.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.79 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.67 on weekdays and 3.30 on weekends, 29% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.25 in April to June 2025 to 4.27 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.27 | 0.47 | 4.67 | 3.30 | 8.9% | 0 of 90 | 106 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.22 | 0.52 | 4.54 | 3.42 | 5.1% | 0 of 92 | 103 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.14 | 0.60 | 4.45 | 3.36 | 8.2% | 0 of 92 | 109 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.25 | 0.58 | 4.64 | 3.27 | 7.3% | 0 of 91 | 106 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Tennessee, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.56 | 3.95 | 3.27 | 4.0% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tennessee, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.27 | $17.09 to $19.66 | 27,040 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.31 | $23.64 to $30.12 | 20,830 |
| Registered nurses | $39.18 | $36.28 to $45.79 | 72,200 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Tennessee | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.1 | 14.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 3.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.8 | 17.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 5.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.6 | 16.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.8 | 22.6 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.3 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Manchester Center for Rehabilitation and Healing L's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (55.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
55.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Tennessee: 62 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 168 eligible stays.
10.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Tennessee: 1 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 180 eligible stays.
7.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Tennessee: 2 better, 1 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 131 eligible stays.
66.2% this home
Median of homes: Tennessee58.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 136 residents counted.
0.6% this home
Median of homes: Tennessee0.8% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 179 residents counted.
0.7% this home
Median of homes: Tennessee1.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 179 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Tennessee98.7% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 102 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MANCHESTER CENTER FOR REHABILITATION AND HEALING LLC. CMS links this home to Carerite Centers, a group of 34 nursing homes averaging 3.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Md Friedman Family 2017 Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 37% | 12/01/2019 |
| Neal Einhorn Family 2017 Trust | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 37% | 12/01/2019 |
| Schwartz, Eliezer | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 7% | 12/01/2019 |
| Einhorn, Neal | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2019 | |
| Friedman, Mark | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 12/01/2019 | |
| Friedman, Mark | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2019 | |
| Adderly, Darren | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Clark, Anastasia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Hopkins, Holly | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/14/2024 | |
| Md Friedman Family 2017 Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2019 | |
| Neal Einhorn Family 2017 Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/01/2019 | |
| Adderly, Darren | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Clark, Anastasia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2025 | |
| Hopkins, Holly | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/14/2024 | |
| Schwartz, Eliezer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2019 | |
| Zucker, Yossie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Tennessee. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.