Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab
725 Se 202nd Avenue, Portland, OR 97233 · Multnomah County · (503) 665-3118
80 certified beds, about 67 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1988
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385183 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 22, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 19 health citations since March 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,033 in the last three years; the largest was $10,033, and the latest is dated May 3, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.03 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.83 of those hours.
32.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to Marquis Companies, an affiliated group of 15 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.
March 24, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to timely report allegations of abuse to the State Agency for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
August 22, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide maintenance to maintain a safe, comfortable and homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for physical environment. This placed residents at risk for an unsafe and unkempt interior building.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled in a way to minimize food spoilage in 1 of 2 unit refrigerators and safe food storage handling techniques for 1 of 1 meal service reviewed for kitchen. This placed residents at risk for potential infections related to foodborne pathogens and cross contamination.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented for 2 of 2 residents (#1 and 18) reviewed for catheter care and pressure ulcers pressure ulcer. This placed resident at risk for infection.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to implement a physician order on the care plan for thickened liquids for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#36) investigated for hydration. This placed residents at risk for choking and aspiration.
- D Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a bed was in good repair for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for potential injury.
May 3, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff followed the care plan related to fall safety and provide sufficient supervision to prevent a fall for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 306 and 47) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in resident 306 having a fall with serious injury including a left shoulder fracture, a rib fracture and periprosthetic fracture involving the left greater trochanter (fracture of a previously-repaired hip) which required emergency medical services and treatment at the hospital.
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a written Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) in a timely fashion for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#47) reviewed for Beneficiary Protection Notification. This placed residents at risk for unknown financial liabilities.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 34 and 29) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to conduct a new/accurate Level I PASARR when the facility became aware of indicators of a serious mental illness diagnoses and failed to complete a referral for a Level ll PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) for 1 of 5 residents (# 46) reviewed for medications. This placed residents with a mental health disorder at risk for delayed care, emotional distress related to mental illness and lack of services to attain their highest practicable well-being.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a person centered comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 resident (#53) reviewed for communication. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#47) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to perform post-dialysis assessments on 1 of 1 sampled residents (#33) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for unidentified complications related to dialysis treatment.
March 1, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours per day 7 days per week for 54 out of 151 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely assessments and care.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and stored in a manner to minimize spoilage and cross contamination. The facility also failed to ensure the ice machine was plumbed correctly to prevent backflow of contaminated matter into the ice machine for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitary conditions. This placed residents at risk for foodborne illness.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a water management program and conduct a risk analysis assessment for potential areas of growth and spread of water borne pathogens. This placed residents at risk for exposure to water borne pathogens.
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to screen residents for eligibility and failed to administer influenza and pneumococcal vaccines in accordance with CDC recommendations for 4 of 5 sampled residents (#s 18, 23, 31 and 32) reviewed for immunizations. This placed residents at risk for illness.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to accurately reflect resident needs for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
- D Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure waste was properly contained in dumpsters and garbage storage areas were maintained in a sanitary condition for 1 of 1 garbage area reviewed for kitchen sanitation. This placed residents at risk for potential exposure to pathogens related to the harborage and feeding of pests.
Fire safety inspections
19 fire safety citations on file: 4 on August 22, 2025, 7 on May 3, 2024, 8 on March 1, 2023.
Every fire safety citation19 citations
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- D Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2024 | Fine | $10,033 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.03 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.54 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.90 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.29 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 32.0% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 20.0% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.63 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.22 on weekdays and 4.54 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.91 in April to June 2025 to 5.03 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.03 | 0.83 | 5.22 | 4.54 | 5.5% | 0 of 90 | 67 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.01 | 0.98 | 5.25 | 4.41 | 7.1% | 0 of 92 | 61 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.79 | 0.83 | 5.03 | 4.17 | 8.2% | 1 of 92 | 59 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.91 | 0.73 | 5.11 | 4.41 | 5.9% | 1 of 91 | 59 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Oregon
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.96 | $22.83 to $28.40 | 14,800 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.69 | $35.11 to $43.60 | 4,260 |
| Registered nurses | $62.02 | $51.55 to $64.63 | 39,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.7 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.0 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.8 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.4 | 21.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.4 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: MARQUIS COMPANIES II INC. CMS links this home to Marquis Companies, a group of 15 nursing homes averaging 4.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marquis Companies I, Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 05/01/2015 |
| Fogg, Phillip | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 100% | 06/22/2012 |
| English, Meagan | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Fogg, Steven | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Levee, Kathleen | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Tone, Staci | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 06/22/2012 | |
| Fogg, Phillip | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/22/2012 | |
| Fogg, Steven | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/22/2012 | |
| Marquis Companies I, Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 05/01/2015 | |
| English, Meagan | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Fogg, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Levee, Kathleen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Stone, Amy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2015 | |
| Tone, Staci | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2015 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 22, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 22, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 22, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 3, 2024: "Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Gresham Post Acute Care and Rehabilitation Gresham, 1.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 51 citations
- Village Health Care Gresham, 1.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Village Manor of Cascadia Wood Village, 2.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Fairlawn Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia Gresham, 3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Avalon Care Center - Portland Portland, 3.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Portland Health and Rehabilitation Portland, 3.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 55 citations
- Menlo Park Post Acute Portland, 3.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Cedar Crossings Portland, 4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 57 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 22, 2025. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $10,033 in the last three years.
- Does Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab?
- CMS lists 14 owners and managers, and links the home to Marquis Companies. Legal business name: MARQUIS COMPANIES II INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.