Menlo Park Post Acute
745 Ne 122nd Avenue, Portland, OR 97230 · Multnomah County · (503) 252-0241
83 certified beds, about 72 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385044 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 13, 2026, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
None of its 36 health citations since July 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.50 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.44 of those hours.
39.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to PACS Group, an affiliated group of 275 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
707/23
106/24
110/24
1311/24
1302/26
105/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 36 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
22D
10E
4F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 22, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
February 13, 2026Standard inspection · 13 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures met the minimum requirements for 1 of 1 dishwasher and failed to ensure food was labeled and stored in a manner to minimize spoilage and cross contamination for 1 of 1 resident refrigerator reviewed for the kitchen. This placed residents at risk for food borne illnesses, communicable diseases, and un-sanitized dishware and utensils.
- E Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete comprehensive MDS assessments in the required timeframe for 3 of 26 sampled residents (#s 30, 62 and 66) reviewed for resident assessment. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs.
- E Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete Quarterly MDS assessments in the required timeframe for 7 of 8 sampled residents (#s 12, 15, 26, 45, 51, 67 and 80) reviewed for resident assessment. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs.
- E Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide resident centered activities for 5 of 5 sampled residents (#s 2, 3, 20, 30 and 60) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life.
- E Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a qualified professional to direct the activities program for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for unmet physical, mental and psychosocial needs.
- E Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure waste was properly contained in dumpsters and garbage storage areas were maintained in a sanitary condition for 1 of 1 garbage area reviewed for kitchen sanitation. This placed residents at risk for exposure to pathogens related to the harborage and feeding of pests.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed for 1 of 1 sampled employee (#27) and 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s) reviewed for infection prevention and control practices. This placed residents at risk for infections.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to self-administer medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 13 and 47) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration.
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident right to privacy was honored for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#64) reviewed for privacy. The placed residents at risk for exposure of personal information.
- D Provide appropriate foot care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate foot care for 2 of 5 sampled resident (#42 and 45) reviewed for ADL care. This placed residents at risk for complications and discomfort.
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure trauma informed care was assessed to ensure proper practices were provided for 2 of 2 resident (#s 3 and 10) reviewed for mood and behavior. This placed residents at risk for triggered responses and re-traumatization.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate indications for medication use for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#10) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects.
- D Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide emergency dental services for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#42) reviewed for dental care. This placed residents at risk for acute dental pain and poor appetite. Resident 42 was admitted to the facility in 8/2025 with diagnoses including diabetes. The 9/5/25 Care Plan indicated Resident 42 had her/his own teeth and required assistance setting up when oral hygiene was performed. The 11/24/25 Modification of Quarterly MDS indicated Resident 42 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact and Resident 42 did not have dental pain, discomfort and difficulty chewing. The 11/2025 Documentation Survey Report indicated Resident 42 was not verbally or physically aggressive to other residents or staff. [...]
November 8, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 13 citations
- F Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNAs received annual performance reviews for 5 of 5 randomly selected CNA staff (#s 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10) reviewed for sufficient and competent staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of care by competent staff.
- F Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 5 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) reviewed for evidence of in-service training. This placed residents at risk for lack of quality care.
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for dining. This placed residents at risk for a lessened quality of life.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were maintained within secured (locked) locations, accessible only to designated staff for 3 of 6 medication and treatment carts reviewed for safe medication storage. This placed residents at risk for unsafe access to medications and diversion of medication.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the ice machine and ice machine scoop were cleaned adequately to maintain sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitary kitchen services. This placed residents at risk of foodborne illness.
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to inform residents and/or the residents' responsible party of the risks and benefits, and to ensure consent was obtained for the use of psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 34 and 66) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for lack of informed consent.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a resident for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#19) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to timely report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 60) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure transfer notices with appeal rights were provided in writing to residents and their representatives, and to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of resident hospitalizations for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#73) reviewed for hospitalizations. This placed residents at risk for lack of information regarding their options, rights, and lack of advocacy from the Ombudsman Office.
- D Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with a written notice of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#73) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their choices and potential financial responsibilities.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 8, 34 and 66) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences.
- D Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist in vision care needs for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#34) reviewed for vision. This placed residents at risk for impaired vision.
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors received trauma-informed care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 39) reviewed for mood. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization and decreased quality of life.
October 8, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were appropriately supervised while smoking for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#106) reviewed for smoking safety. This placed residents at risk for injury from fire hazards.
June 6, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 2 sampled residents (# 106) reviewed for misappropriation. This placed residents at risk for loss of property.
July 31, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to follow appropriate hand hygiene while preparing and serving food for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination and foodborne illness.
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean and homelike environment on 4 of 4 resident halls and 1 of 1 resident outside courtyard patio reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for tripping and living in an unkept and unhomelike environment.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#4) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess and provide or offer pressure ulcer wound care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#117) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers or delayed healing.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure smoking care plan interventions were followed and smoking materials were stored in a safe manner for 3 of 3 residents (#s 11, 14 and 33) reviewed for smoking. This placed residents at risk for burns and smoking related accidents.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure gradual dose reductions (GDRs) were attempted for residents on psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences.
Fire safety inspections
12 fire safety citations on file: 1 on January 28, 2026, 4 on January 29, 2025, 2 on November 8, 2024, 5 on July 31, 2023.
Every fire safety citation12 citations
- E Have an externally vented heating system.
- F Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.
- F Have an externally vented heating system.
- F Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
- F Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- F Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- D Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- F Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have an alternate power supply for its alarm system.
- D Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.50 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.44 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.04 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.29 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.77 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 39.5% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 55.6% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.68 on weekdays and 4.04 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.52 in April to June 2025 to 4.50 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.50 | 0.44 | 4.68 | 4.04 | 6.7% | 0 of 90 | 72 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.57 | 0.41 | 4.80 | 4.00 | 2.5% | 0 of 92 | 72 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.53 | 0.40 | 4.74 | 4.01 | 6.2% | 0 of 92 | 73 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.52 | 0.37 | 4.75 | 3.95 | 2.2% | 0 of 91 | 72 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.9 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.2 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.6 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.4 | 21.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.6 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: MENLO PARK SNF HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to PACS Group, a group of 275 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Providence Group Nh, LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 05/10/2024 | |
| PACS Group, Inc. | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/10/2024 | |
| PACS Holdings, LLC | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 05/10/2024 | |
| Hancock, Mark | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 05/10/2024 | |
| Murray, Jason | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Truist Bank | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 09/01/2024 | |
| Apt, Frederick | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/10/2024 | |
| Ceesay, Ansumana | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Grace, Victoria | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/21/2024 | |
| Jergensen, Joshua | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/10/2024 | |
| Larson, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2024 | |
| Mitchell, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/10/2024 | |
| Providence Administrative Consulting Services Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2024 | |
| Providence Group Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/01/2025 | |
| Larson, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 13 problems in this area, most recently on May 22, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on February 13, 2026: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on February 13, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 13, 2026: "Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 4.04 hours per resident per day, below the Oregon average of 4.51.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Rose City Nursing and Rehabilitation Portland, 0.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Portland Health and Rehabilitation Portland, 0.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 55 citations
- Glisan Post Acute Portland, 1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Gateway Care and Retirement Portland, 1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Marquis Mill Park Portland, 1.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Evergreen Post Acute Portland, 2.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 41 citations
- Avalon Care Center - Portland Portland, 2.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Secora Rehabilitation of Cascadia Portland, 2.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 37 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Menlo Park Post Acute's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Menlo Park Post Acute 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Menlo Park Post Acute get at its last inspection?
- 13 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 13, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Menlo Park Post Acute been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Menlo Park Post Acute accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Menlo Park Post Acute?
- CMS lists 15 owners and managers, and links the home to PACS Group. Legal business name: MENLO PARK SNF HEALTHCARE LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.