Village Manor of Cascadia
2060 Ne 238th Drive, Wood Village, OR 97060 · Multnomah County · (503) 491-0553
60 certified beds, about 58 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicaid since 1976
Certified for Medicaid
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 38E174 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 9, 2025, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 24 health citations since December 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.52 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.54 of those hours.
20.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
612/22
601/24
1105/25
108/25
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
20D
3E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
August 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to implement care plan interventions to prevent a fall for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for accidents. As a result, Resident 1 sustained multiple pelvic fractures.
May 9, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 11 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for 1 of 1 resident (#9) reviewed for homelike environment. This placed residents at risk for lessened quality of life.
- D Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from chemical restraints for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#57) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for changes to psychosocial well-being.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans that included interventions for the use of psychotropic medication for 1 of 5 sampled resident (#57) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed the resident at risk for side effects and unnecessary medication.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to timely assess and implement appropriate interventions for a change of condition or accident for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#27). This placed the residents at risk for choking.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide care planned safety interventions for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injury.
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received trauma informed care for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 18 and 30) reviewed for behavioral and emotional care needs. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to act upon pharmacist recommendations for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#57) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for a decrease in their quality of life.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary bowel and antihypotensive medications for 2 of 5 sampled resident (#s 20 and 35) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed the resident at risk for adverse side effects from medication complications.
- D Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide therapy services for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#28) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for falls.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse from other residents for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#52) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for physical abuse.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency (SA) within the mandated timeframe for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#2) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
January 17, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to determine if residents had or wished to formulate an advance directive upon admission to the facility for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 9, 18 and 56) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for not having their health care wishes honored.
- E Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were fully informed and understood the binding arbitration agreement for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 42, 55 and 58) reviewed for binding arbitration agreement. This placed residents at risk of being uninformed regarding their legal rights.
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure transfer notices with appeal rights were provided in writing to residents and their representatives, and to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of resident hospitalizations for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 36 and 50) reviewed for hospitalizations. This placed residents at risk of lack of access to an advocate to inform them of their options and rights, and a decreased quality of life.
- D Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 36 and 50) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their choices and potential financial responsibilities.
- D Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#59) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for unmet discharge needs.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's records were complete and accurate for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#56) reviewed for change of condition. This placed residents at risk for incomplete clinical records.
December 7, 2022Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff performed appropriate and adequate hand hygiene during meal delivery for 1 of 2 halls observed during dining. This placed residents at risk for infection.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 11 and 41) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for physical abuse by other residents.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from potential accident hazards for 2 of 2 residents (#s 48 and 51) reviewed for smoking. This placed residents at risk for potential accidents.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary antibiotics for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#27) reviewed for antibiotic use. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication effects and antibiotic resistance.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to honor food choices for one of two sampled residents (#32) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk of not being allowed to make choices related to their food preferences.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure accurate resident medical records for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 11 and 46) reviewed for pre-admission screening with serious mental illness. This placed residents with mental health diagnoses at risk for a lack of appropriate mental health services.
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 1 on May 9, 2025, 4 on January 17, 2024, 5 on December 7, 2022.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- F Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.52 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.54 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.15 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.26 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.72 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 20.9% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 0.0% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 2.82 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.67 on weekdays and 4.15 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.22 in April to June 2025 to 4.52 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.52 | 0.54 | 4.67 | 4.15 | 3.5% | 0 of 90 | 58 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.46 | 0.54 | 4.62 | 4.05 | 4.1% | 0 of 92 | 58 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.18 | 0.54 | 4.36 | 3.75 | 5.5% | 0 of 92 | 58 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.22 | 0.51 | 4.41 | 3.74 | 5.7% | 0 of 91 | 60 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Oregon
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.96 | $22.83 to $28.40 | 14,800 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.69 | $35.11 to $43.60 | 4,260 |
| Registered nurses | $62.02 | $51.55 to $64.63 | 39,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.7 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.6 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 44.0 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on August 12, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 9, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 9, 2025: "Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 9, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 4.15 hours per resident per day, below the Oregon average of 4.51.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab Portland, 2.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Fairlawn Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia Gresham, 2.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Gresham Post Acute Care and Rehabilitation Gresham, 2.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 51 citations
- Lacamas Creek Post Acute Camas, 3.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Regency Gresham Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Gresham, 4.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Village Health Care Gresham, 4.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Menlo Park Post Acute Portland, 5.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Portland Health and Rehabilitation Portland, 6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 55 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Village Manor of Cascadia's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Village Manor of Cascadia 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Village Manor of Cascadia get at its last inspection?
- 9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 9, 2025. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Village Manor of Cascadia been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Village Manor of Cascadia accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Village Manor of Cascadia?
- CMS lists 1 owner or manager. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.