Menard Manor
100 Gay St., Menard, TX 76859 · Menard County · (325) 396-4515
40 certified beds, about 28 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2004
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676020 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 11, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 17 health citations since August 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years; the largest was $8,018, and the latest is dated March 15, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.15 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.69 of those hours.
40.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.
March 20, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately notify and consult with the resident's physician when a significant change in a resident physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that was a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility failed to immediately inform MD on 3/13/2026 of Resident #1's change in condition after she had a fall on 3/13/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of serious decrease in health due to delayed treatment. [...]
December 11, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations
- F Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assure drugs and biologicals were stored properly in 1 of 1 medication room reviewed for expired medications and drug storage. The medication room contained 1 opened vial of insulin that was not dated when it was opened. The medication refrigerator contained 1 opened multi-use vial of Tuberculin PPD that had expired[PH1] . (Tuberculin is a sterile liquid containing the growth products of or specific substances extracted from the tubercle bacillus and used in intradermal skin tests for the diagnosis of tuberculosis). This deficient practice could place residents and staff at risk for not getting an accurate screening for Tuberculosis and at risk of not receiving the therapeutic dose of medication.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare, distribute and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The ceiling fan located above the stove, dishwasher and prep table had lint and dust build up. The Maintenance Supervisor was not wearing a beard restraint when he entered the kitchen on several occasions and while food was present and open to air. [NAME] B coughed while preparing food without covering her mouth, failed to wash her hands correctly, put her bare hands into cooked food, and did not properly sanitize the thermometer while taking temperatures of food. These failures could place the residents that consumed food prepared in the kitchen at risk of food-borne illness.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for two of four (Residents #1 and #26) residents reviewed for infection control, in that: The facility failed to ensure CNA E and CNA F donned PPE while performing personal care for Resident #26. The facility failed to provide PPE for residents in need of EBP for Resident #1 This failure could place residents at risk for spread of infectious diseases.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards/supervision (Resident #26). The facility failed to ensure CNA E and CNA F demonstrated appropriate transfer techniques while using the mechanical lift for Resident #26. These failures could place residents at risk for injuries.
September 12, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet, attain, and/or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to have a care plan in place to accurately address Resident #1 diagnosis of diabetes. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan accurately reflected her ½ side-rail use. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving individualized care and services to meet their needs.
- E Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets met his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3) reviewed for dietary services in that: The residents with puree diet did not receive consistent portion sizes of the puree desert. The facility served zero sugar pudding cups in place of the fortified pudding for lunch for Resident #2 and Resident #3. These failures could place residents at risk for poor food intake, weight loss, and diminished quality of life.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure: Staff did not re-glove using the same single use glove. Staff did not cross contaminated the kitchen after touching the trash can lid and the did not immediately wash their hands. Staff did not handle food with their bare hands. Staff did not put food on cooking surfaces without ensuring they were covered. The walk-in refrigerator was maintained in a sanitary manner. These failures could affect residents who received meals prepared from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness and cross contamination.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #32 and Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for infection control. CNA A failed to change her gloves after they became contaminated during incontinent care while assisting Resident #32. CNA's I & J failed to use enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during transferring Resident #1 from his bed to his wheelchair. (EBP - refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). [...]
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent resident abuse for 1 of 4 (Resident #10) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure the housekeeping supervisor, per the facility's policy, immediately reported witnessed suspected roughness towards Resident #10 by CNA C on 09/07/24 to the Administrator, DON, or ADON. The housekeeper supervisor reported the allegation until 09/10/24. The housekeeper supervisor believed CNA C was rough with Resident #10 and wanted to see the video of the incident to see if CNA C was indeed abusive to the resident as she was not sure the incident occurred. Theses failures could place residents at risk for unsafe environment and further abuse.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, or if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse or result in bodily injury not later than 24 hours, to Administrator for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #10 )reviewed for abuse in that: The housekeeper supervisor did not report that she thought she witnessed CNA C be rough with Resident #10 to the Administrator within 2 hours of the incident. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for not having all allegations of abuse and neglect reported to the State Survey Agency in a timely manner.
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (Resident #32) of one reviewed for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy - PEG (a tube inserted through the abdomen into the stomach for the purpose of administering liquid nutrition and medications) received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications and aspiration. LVN B failed to check PEG tube residual prior to administering Resident #32's medication as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents receiving tube feedings at risk for aspiration pneumonia, dehydration, and metabolic abnormalities which could result in additional medical treatment and a decline in the resident's health.
- D Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail, assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, and review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for 1 of 4 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for bed rails. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's ½ side rail was installed correctly. The facility failed to correctly care plan Resident #2's side rails. These failures could place residents at risk of injury, hinder residents from getting out of bed, and/or cause a decline in resident's ability to engage in activities of daily living.
- C Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow guidelines for mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. Long-term care facilities must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS. This failure could affect any resident in the facility, placing them at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment.
March 15, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision. CNA A, CNA B, and CNA C failed to follow the plan of care which required a 2 person assist to transfer Resident #1 with the Hoyer Lift on 11/26/23. Resident #1 was transferred to a local hospital and an x-ray confirmed a proximal tibia and fibula fracture (break, in the shinbone just below the knee). The failure resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 on 11/28/2023. It was determined to be past non-compliance due to the facility having implemented actions that corrected the non-compliance prior to the beginning of the investigation. The failure placed residents at the facility who require the Hoyer lift at risk for pain or serious injuries.
August 10, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of residents, 1 of 1 Medication Carts and 1 of 1 Medication Storage Rooms reviewed for pharmacy services. - The facility failed to ensure the Medication Cart did not include two expired cards of Morphine Sulfate 15mg tablets. - The facility failed to ensure the Medication Storage Room did not contain one expired card of Baclofen 10 mg and one expired box of Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Solution 1.25mg/3ml. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications, adverse reactions to medications and worsening of symptoms of diseases. Findings Included: [...]
- D Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a RN for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for RN coverage (January 2023, February 2023, and March 2023). The facility did not have the required 8 consecutive hours of RN coverage during the months of January 2023 (4 days), February 2023 (3 days), and March 2023 (1 days). This failure could place residents at risk for not having their nursing care and medical needs met.
Fire safety inspections
6 fire safety citations on file: 3 on December 11, 2025, 2 on September 12, 2024, 1 on August 10, 2023.
Every fire safety citation6 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Install proper backup exit lighting.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 15, 2024 | Fine | $8,018 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.15 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.69 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.31 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.54 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.92 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 40.0% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 16.7% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.54 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.49 on weekdays and 3.31 on weekends, 26% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.35 in April to June 2025 to 4.15 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.15 | 0.69 | 4.49 | 3.31 | 8.5% | 0 of 90 | 28 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.47 | 0.78 | 4.84 | 3.53 | 18.2% | 0 of 92 | 26 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.65 | 0.75 | 3.95 | 2.88 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 26 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.35 | 0.82 | 4.78 | 3.27 | 2.7% | 0 of 91 | 27 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.1 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.3 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.9 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: MENARD COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Menard County Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/19/1975 |
| Corbin, George | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 11/28/2022 | |
| Cordes, Janis | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/08/2004 | |
| Duncan, Sheridan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/02/2015 | |
| Wilkinson, Jo | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/11/2011 | |
| Wilkinson, Melanye | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/23/2022 | |
| Cordes, Janis | Corporate director | Individual | 03/08/2004 | |
| Duncan, Sheridan | Corporate director | Individual | 03/02/2015 | |
| Wilkinson, Jo | Corporate director | Individual | 05/11/2011 | |
| Menard County Hospital District | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/19/1975 | |
| Heyman, Bobbi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/15/2012 | |
| Menard County Hospital District | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/19/1975 | |
| Heyman, Bobbi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/15/2012 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on December 11, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 11, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 11, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 11, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Concho Health & Rehabilitation Center Eden, 21.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Menard Manor's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Menard Manor 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Menard Manor get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 11, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Menard Manor been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years.
- Does Menard Manor accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Menard Manor?
- CMS lists 13 owners and managers. Legal business name: MENARD COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.