Find a nursing home

Home / Pennsylvania / Chambersburg

Menno Haven Rehabilitation Center

2055 Scotland Avenue, Chambersburg, PA 17201 · Franklin County · (717) 262-1012

44 certified beds, about 38 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare since 2019

CMS high performing icon Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 396145 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 8, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).

None of its 11 health citations since August 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.76 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.77 of those hours.

28.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
7D
3E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 8, 2026Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    F887 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 13, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide accurate and timely documentation related to offering the COVID-19 vaccination for five of 22 residents reviewed (Residents 7, 11, 23, 32, 50).
August 13, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. F
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and observations, as well as resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to serve food items at appetizing temperatures.
  2. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on policies and clinical record reviews, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician's order was obtained to provide specialized respiratory treatment for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 45).
  3. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 26, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies and clinical records, as well as interviews with residents, family members, and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain professional practices that support infection prevention and control for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 35).
August 7, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included specific and individualized interventions to address the care needs for two of 16 residents reviewed (Residents 17, 29).
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was thawed as per facility policy and that food stored in the kitchen was labeled, dated and secured.
  3. E
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were complete and accurately documented for three of 16 residents reviewed (Residents 11, 26, 29). Findings Include: An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 11, dated June 11, 2024, revealed that the resident was understood, could understand others, and had diagnoses that included a hip fracture. A care plan for the resident, dated July 5, 2024, revealed that the resident was on a Restorative Nursing Program for active range of motion, and the resident was to perform 15 ankle pumps (bend foot up and down at the ankle joint) and 15 ankle rolls (roll ankle to the right in a circular motion, and then to the left in a circular motion) two times per day. [...]
  4. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on a review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician was notified timely about a change in condition for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 11).
  5. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical records, and observations, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan was developed and implemented for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 50).
  6. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician orders were followed for one of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 11).
  7. D
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    F867 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the facility's plans of correction for previous surveys, and the results of the current survey, it was determined that the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to correct quality deficiencies and ensure that plans to improve the delivery of care and services effectively addressed recurring deficient practices.

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homePennsylvaniaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.763.893.86
Registered nurses1.770.790.69
All nursing staff on weekends5.153.533.42
Nurse aides2.89
Licensed practical nurses1.09
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)28.3%44.5%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover17.6%39.9%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.90 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.99 on weekdays and 5.15 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 6.08 in April to June 2025 to 5.76 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.761.775.995.15 5.2%0 of 9038
Oct to Dec 20256.411.976.675.71 2.8%0 of 9235
Jul to Sep 20255.911.716.155.30 3.9%0 of 9238
Apr to Jun 20256.081.776.275.57 2.2%0 of 9136
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 20263.690.653.823.3411.3%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homePennsylvaniaUS
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.31.41.6
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
18.922.523.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
5.99.512.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: MENNO-HAVEN, INC..

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Manufacturers and Trades Trust Company5% or greater security interestOrganization12/01/2018
George, CarolynCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2022
Gingrich, CharleneCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2019
Gipe, RonaldCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2015
Macbride, LynnCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2019
O'Donnell, PatrickCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2021
Peterson, ToddCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2024
Sciamanna, DavidCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Trinh, SuzanneCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2021
Warner, PaulaCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2022
Williams, AnthonyCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2024
Yeager, WayneCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Beins, RogerCorporate officerIndividual04/01/2015
Fritz, RyanCorporate officerIndividual05/01/2023
Martin, TiffanyCorporate officerIndividual12/01/2023
Nelson, CharlesCorporate officerIndividual04/03/2006
Diehl, AndrewOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/24/2022

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2024: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 8, 2026: "Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 13, 2025: "Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 13, 2025: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."

Other nursing homes nearby

Pennsylvania contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Menno Haven Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Menno Haven Rehabilitation Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Menno Haven Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on July 8, 2026. The Pennsylvania average is 10.
Has Menno Haven Rehabilitation Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Menno Haven Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
Who owns Menno Haven Rehabilitation Center?
CMS lists 17 owners and managers. Legal business name: MENNO-HAVEN, INC..

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection