Find a nursing home

Home / Iowa / Monticello

Monticello Nursing & Rehab Center

500 Pinehaven Drive, Monticello, IA 52310 · Jones County · (319) 465-5415

75 certified beds, about 47 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 165279 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 8, 2026, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Iowa average is 6.5, the national average 9.2).

None of its 21 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.17 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Iowa and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.70 of those hours.

50.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Iowa average 44.0%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
17D
4E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 24, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    F604 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 21, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to keep a resident free from physical restraints during a period of behaviors. A staff member used her body to force a resident to ambulate to her room for 1 out of 1 residents reviewed with behaviors (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
  2. D
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 21, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and policy interview the facility administered a antipsychotic medication without a physician's order for 1 out of 1 residents reviewed with agitation and behaviors (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 43 residents.
March 25, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident remained free from verbal mistreatment by staff for one of three residents reviewed (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 51 residents. The facility corrected the deficient practice per past noncompliance through the following actions: -An all-staff meeting was held on 3/1/2026. Abuse training completed and abuse policy signed by all attendees.-Two additional all-staff meetings were held on 3/2/2026. All attendees completed abuse training and signed the abuse policy. -All alert and oriented residents were interviewed regarding their safety. -Incident review by Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting on 3/10/2026.
  2. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided for a resident with a history of falls for one of three residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 51 residents. The facility corrected the deficient practice per past noncompliance through the following actions: -Staff education initiated on 3/10/2026 regarding importance of proper rounding and resident monitoring. Education continued on 3/11/2026, and ongoing until all Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and nurses have completed and signed the education form. -Alert and oriented residents were interviewed regarding their safety and well-being. -Incident was added to the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) agenda.
January 8, 2026Standard inspection · 0 citations
November 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff and resident interviews the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent resident to resident behaviors (Resident # 2, Resident #4, Resident #6, Resident #8, Resident #9). The facility identified a census of 48 residents.
  2. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to prevent a resident to resident altercation, involving Resident #1 and Resident #2, for 1 out of 2 incidents reviewed. The facility identified a census of 48 residents.
November 4, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to protect a resident's dignity by failing to ensure the indwelling urinary drainage bag was kept in a dignity bag for one of three residents reviewed with an indwelling catheter (Resident #11). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #11 as severely cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15 and had the following diagnoses: Cerebral Infarction and Compression of the Brain. The MDS identified Resident #11 was dependent on staff for toileting, showers, lower body dressing, and putting on/taking off footwear and had an indwelling urinary catheter. [...]
  2. D
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, clinical record review, and review of Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services document, Form CMS-20052, the facility failed to provide proper notification to residents and/or resident representatives of the right to appeal decision for discharge from Medicare Part A for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge from Medicare Part A with benefit days remaining (Residents #18, #303, and #304). The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
  3. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident, and staff interviews the facility failed to account for the resident's location when a resident chose to smoke per Care Plan for one of two residents reviewed (Resident #29). The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
  4. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident, family, and staff interviews the facility failed to complete the facility Smoking Assessment to assess for resident's capabilities and deficits to safely smoke for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #1 and #29). The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
  5. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain consistent records of Hemodialysis communication for 2 out of 2 months for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed (Resident#10). The facility reported a census of 50 residents.
November 30, 2023Standard inspection · 10 citations
  1. E
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident and family interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the opportunity for the resident and/or resident representative to participate in the development, review and revision of his/her Care Plan on a quarterly basis for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #16, #18, #44 and #46). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #46 had an admission date of 11/28/22 and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident had diagnoses that included quadriplegia, dysphagia, neurogenic bladder, anxiety disorder, depression, diabetes mellitus and asthma. [...]
  2. E
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer medications within the facility scheduled time frame for 4 of 7 residents (Resident #2, #34, #44, #50) observed during medication administration and further failed to administer the correct dosage of the medication Torsemide, to Resident #2, according to physician's order. The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: 1. On 11/29/23, the following observations were made while watching Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) complete a Medication Pass to residents as they sat in the dining room: a. At 9:15 AM, Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), prepared and administered medications to Resident #2. b. At 8:36 AM, Staff H, prepared and administered medications to Resident #34. c. [...]
  3. E
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    F725 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to respond to resident's needs within the required fifteen minute time frame when residents activated their call lights. Observations of call lights revealed 4 of 14 call lights were over the fifteen minute time frame when responded to (Resident #3, #13, #42, and #205). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: 1. Resident #13 admitted to the facility 2/7/21. The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #13 had a BIMS score of 10 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had diagnoses including non-Alzheimer's dementia, seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury, and ataxia. The MDS revealed the resident was independent with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting and required supervision of 1 staff person for personal hygiene. [...]
  4. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide clean and sanitary wheelchairs or electric scooter for 3 of 3 residents whom required wheelchair/scooter transportation (Residents #5, #9, and #47). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: On 11/28/23 at 8:49 AM, wheelchairs that belonged to Resident #5 and #47 sat empty in a carpeted area of dining room during breakfast. The residents sat in dining room chairs for the meal. Resident #5's wheelchair held a folded bed pad on the seat of wheelchair with yellow colored rings stained across the pad. Noted wheelchair for Resident #47 with crumbs and white smeared stains across the top of the seat. Both Resident #5 and #47 were transported back into wheelchairs following the meal. [...]
  5. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct comprehensive assessments of residents in accordance with the timeframes specified for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Residents #12 and #205). The facility reported a census of 50. Findings Include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #12 dated 8/31/23 revealed the resident scored 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated intact cognition. Diagnoses included chronic congestive heart failure, end stage renal disease, and anemia. MDS section O failed to include documentation of the resident's need for Dialysis. The Care Plan included a diagnosis of dependence on renal dialysis. A Focus Area dated 9/29/21 indicated the resident needed Dialysis (hemo) related to chronic kidney disease. [...]
  6. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a Baseline Care Plan within the timeframes specified for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #11 and #205). The facility reported a census of 50. Findings Include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #205 dated 11/23/23 was in progress and the electronic health record indicated the submission was 3 days overdue. At the time of review on 11/29/23 sections A, B, E, GG, H, I, J, L, M, N, O, and P remained incomplete. On 11/30/23 at 10:15 AM, the resident's chart lacked a Baseline Care Plan. On 11/30/23 at 2:20 PM, the Administrator confirmed that the facility was unable to locate the resident's Baseline Care Plan. She believed the Director of Nursing (DON) was completing these and she was out of the building. 2. [...]
  7. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person centered Care Plan that included measurable objectives regarding safety and risk reduction for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #30). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #30 revealed the resident scored 00 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The staff assessment section for cognition was not completed and indicated the resident was able to complete the BIMS. The facility failed to complete the resident's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), dated 11/11/22, prior to admission. [...]
  8. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician, assess a resident, or document an incident following a medication error for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for medication dosage error. The Facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/15/23, revealed diagnoses include Chronic diastolic heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Resident #2 had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 10, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. The Care Plan Focus Area, initiated 8/12/2019, for diuretic (water pill) medications indicated a goal that Resident #2 will receive diuretic as ordered and be free from medication side effects. [...]
  9. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to put interventions in place as directed by the Care Plan to aid in prevention of the reoccurrence of pressure sore areas for 1 out of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #11). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. [...]
  10. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the provider timely of a significant weight lost for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #52). The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Findings Include: Resident #52 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The resident had diagnoses that included coronary artery disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, diabetes mellitus, non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression and open wounds of right and left lower legs. The resident required moderate assistance with toileting, transfers, supervision with personal hygiene and was independent with eating. [...]

Fire safety inspections

16 fire safety citations on file: 4 on January 8, 2026, 7 on November 4, 2024, 5 on November 30, 2023.

Every fire safety citation16 citations
  1. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · January 8, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · January 8, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · January 8, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · January 8, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · November 4, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · November 4, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · November 4, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · November 4, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · November 4, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. F
    Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
    K 914 · November 4, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. E
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · November 4, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. F
    Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
    K 291 · November 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. F
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · November 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. F
    Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
    K 341 · November 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · November 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · November 30, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeIowaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.173.823.86
Registered nurses0.700.740.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.223.373.42
Nurse aides2.15
Licensed practical nurses0.33
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)50.0%44.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover40.0%42.1%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.17 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.56 on weekdays and 2.22 on weekends, 38% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 14.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.38 in April to June 2025 to 3.17 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.170.703.562.22 14.7%2 of 9047
Oct to Dec 20253.560.653.782.99 21.3%0 of 9248
Jul to Sep 20253.330.773.552.77 10.8%0 of 9247
Apr to Jun 20253.380.783.602.82 19.4%1 of 9150
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Iowa, Jan to Mar 20263.800.713.983.364.7%0.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeIowaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.917.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.81.50.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.62.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.13.83.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.11.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
10.616.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.84.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.519.415.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
37.020.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
19.613.212.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.41.51.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.32.11.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: MONTICELLO NURSING HOME COMPANY.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
John R Grubb Family Trust5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization12%10/31/2004
John W Grubb Trust5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization44%12/31/2020
Kimberly D Grubb Trust5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization44%12/31/2020
Grubb, KimberlyCorporate officerIndividual02/01/2026
Campbell Street Services LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization02/01/2026
Gentzler, NickOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/03/2025
Hall, McKennaOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/28/2025
Smith, MichelleOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/14/2025
Weston, MichaelOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/1997
Dole, IsaacIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual02/12/2026
John R Grubb Family TrustTrustee of the SNFOrganization10/31/2004
John W Grubb TrustTrustee of the SNFOrganization12/31/2020
Kimberly D Grubb TrustTrustee of the SNFOrganization12/31/2020
Campbell Street Services LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/12/2026
John R Grubb Family TrustAdp of the SNFOrganization01/14/2025
John W Grubb TrustAdp of the SNFOrganization12/31/2020
Kimberly D Grubb TrustAdp of the SNFOrganization12/31/2020
Gentzler, NickAdp of the SNFIndividual05/03/2025
Hall, McKennaAdp of the SNFIndividual04/28/2025
Smith, MichelleAdp of the SNFIndividual03/14/2025
Weston, MichaelAdp of the SNFIndividual07/01/1997

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on March 25, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on November 4, 2024: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
  3. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 24, 2026: "Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on November 4, 2024: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.22 hours per resident per day, below the Iowa average of 3.37.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Iowa contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Iowa. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Monticello Nursing & Rehab Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Monticello Nursing & Rehab Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Monticello Nursing & Rehab Center get at its last inspection?
0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 8, 2026. The Iowa average is 6.5.
Has Monticello Nursing & Rehab Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Monticello Nursing & Rehab Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Monticello Nursing & Rehab Center?
CMS lists 21 owners and managers. Legal business name: MONTICELLO NURSING HOME COMPANY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection