455 31st Street, Marion, IA 52302 · Linn County · (319) 377-7363
91 certified beds, about 74 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 165171 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 23, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Iowa average is 6.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 60 health citations since October 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $29,107 in the last three years; the largest was $16,068, and the latest is dated February 22, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.55 hours per resident per day, against 3.82 across Iowa and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.65 of those hours.
55.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Iowa average 44.0%).
CMS links it to Ivy Healthcare Group, an affiliated group of 4 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 60 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Statement of Deficiencies forms, review of the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) documentation, QAPI policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to implement effective quality assurance processes to address deficient practices with F658 Services Provided Meet Professional Standards, F725 Sufficient Nursing Staff, and F880 Infection Prevention and Control, resulting in deficient practices previously identified in 2025 also identified on the facility's current survey. The facility reported a census of 75 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interviews, facility document review and facility policy review the facility failed to answer call lights timely for 4 out of 6 residents reviewed (Resident #1, Resident #26, Resident #50,and Resident #80). The facility reported a census of 75 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, employee files, facility document review, and facility policy review the facility failed to check the licensure for 1 of 1 nurse before hire, and failed to obtain clearance from the Department of Criminal Investigation (DCI) before 1 out of 5 staff were hired. The facility reported a census of 75 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility failed to notify the Long-Term Care Ombudsman of discharge and transfers as required for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident #13). The facility reported a census of 75 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interviews, resident interviews, and policy review the facility failed to follow Physician's Orders when applying topical medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #50). The facility reported a census of 75 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure assessments were completed before and after dialysis and ensure ongoing coordination between the facility and dialysis center for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 75 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #6 and Resident #11). The facility reported a census of 75 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, training documentation, personnel files, and policy review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents received respectful dignified care that protected their right to privacy (Residents #2 and #8). An Activity Assistant walked into Resident #2's room while a Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) was providing personal cares, and into Resident #8's room while she was dressing and using the restroom. The facility reported a census of 70 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Statement of Deficiencies form, the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, and staff interviews the facility failed to carry out Quality Assurance activities to ensure effective measures had been taken to correct deficiencies and prevent their ongoing prevalence. The facility reported a census of 76 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident to resident abuse,(Resident #3 and Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 76 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff in order to provide bathing and/or grooming assistance for 8 of 13 residents reviewed for activities of daily living assistance (Residents #2, #10, #13, #30, #46, #49, #71, & #231). The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out a system of surveillance to track and address infections and potential infections in the facility. The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to treat 3 of 7 residents reviewed with dignity and respect while providing care and services (Residents #30, #49, and #51). The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide bathing and/or grooming assistance for 8 of 13 residents reviewed for activities of daily living assistance (Residents #2, #10, #13, #30, #46, #49, #71, #231). The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to carry out wound assessments and/or wound treatments for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for non-pressure wounds (Residents #63, #71, and #232). The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, facility cleaning schedules, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain adequate kitchen sanitation for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to offer influenza vaccines to 4 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents #2, #8, #10, and #63). The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to offer a Covid-19 vaccine for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for vaccinations (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident records included advance directive wishes for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for code status (Residents #2 and #10). The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, pharmacy record review, resident interview, police narrative, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to protect 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse from misappropriation of property and exploitation (Resident #51). The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, pharmacy record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to report potential misappropriation and exploitation for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #51). Facility staff indicated they were aware of potential incidents as early as July 2024. The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on a police narrative, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent further potential misappropriation of property and exploitation and failed to conduct thorough investigations into two incidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #51). The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide services according to physician orders for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Residents #49). The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete regular assessments and treatments to treat a pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #71). The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure safe wheelchair movement for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for wheelchair safety (Resident #41). The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on personnel file review, the Health Facility Database (HFD), and interviews the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) was certified prior to employment. The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on personnel file review, staff training records, and interviews the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) received a performance evaluation, competency evaluation, or training based on performance reviews. The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure the availability of routine medications for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for medications (Resident #17 and #13) The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, facility menus, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow the menu for 2 out of 2 residents on a pureed diet to ensure nutritional needs were met. The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, facility policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff served food at palatable hot holding temperatures for 1 of 1 meal observed. The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on personnel file review, staff training records, and interviews the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) completed 12 hours of in-services per year that included abuse and dementia training. The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of resident transfers to the hospital for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents #31, #43, #70). The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, Progress Notes, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to notify a resident and their representative of the cost to hold their bed when the resident was transferred out of the facility for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Residents #31, #43, #70). The facility failed to complete written Bed Hold notices or provide potential costs to the resident or family representative. The facility reported a census of 74 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy, provider interview, and staff interviews the facility failed to notify resident's representatives and providers in a timely manner of test results related to changes in clinical conditions for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for notification (Residents #2 and #3). The responsible parties were not notified of x-ray results (Resident #2) or a new urinary tract infection (Resident #3). The facility further failed to provide x-ray and urine culture results to providers in a timely manner (Residents #2 and #3). The facility reported a census of 77 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the electronic health record, hospital reports, facility policy, and interviews the facility failed to provide sufficient resident assessments and interventions to maintain resident's highest practical physical and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #2 and #3). The review revealed staff assessed a resident with new orders for as needed (PRN) oxygen and new complaints of breathing and chest discomfort 1 time during a 56 hour period, and did not assess a resident with pending urine culture results for 8 days. The facility reported a census of 77 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete clinical records for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for records (Residents #2 and #3). The medical records for Resident #2 and Resident #3 failed to reflect the resident's current health conditions and the services provided to ensure communication throughout the interdisciplinary team. The facility reported a census of 77 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to serve hot food at least 135 degrees Fahrenheit and provide a palatable meal for 2 of 2 noon meal trays tested. The facility reported a census of 78 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and resident and staff interview the facility failed to complete pre-dialysis and post-dialysis assessments for 1 of 1 resident on dialysis (Resident #2), and the facility failed to routinely assess a resident's skin condition for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for skin impairments (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 78 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews, policy review, and observations the facility failed to provide adequate assessment and timely interventions for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 73 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 70 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate assessment and interventions for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 70 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete accurate evaluation, failed to implement interventions and failed to prevent a staff member from allowing an exit seeking cognitively impaired resident from leaving the facility at 5:40 AM, walking down the street around the corner, down a main road 0.3 miles (1584 feet) and being outside in below freezing temperatures for 20 minutes. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the resident. The Facility reported a census of 67 Residents. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on February 19, 2024 on February 20, 2024 at 10:45 a.m. Facility staff corrected the Immediate Jeopardy on February 20, 2024 through the following actions: a. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to attempt to enter into a transfer agreement with a hospital in an effort to ensure that the transfer of residents was safe and orderly. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. The facility identified a census of 67 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, staff and resident interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to treat 4 out of 4 resident reviewed with dignity for cares and meals (Resident #32, 34, 52, and 56). The facility reported a census of 67 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to cover resident drinks during transportation through the hallways in 2 of 3 hallways observed for resident room tray delivery. The facility reported a census of 67 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to document education and/or administration of flu and pneumococcal immunizations for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents #1, #4, #31, and #267). The facility reported a census of 67 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility failed to complete a resident assessment for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for self-administration of medications, (Resident #19). A resident's medication was left in their possession without a completed assessment to determine if self-administration was clinically appropriate. The facility reported a census of 67 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, manufacturer's recommendations and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow manufacturer ' s recommendations while administering insulin utilizing a KwikPen, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for insulin administration (Resident #167). The facility reported a census of 67 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess and document an open ulcerated wound and further failed to perform hand hygiene at appropriate times during wound care to prevent infection for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions, (Resident #267). The facility reported a census of 67 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review, document review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure licensed and certified nursing staff had documented competency skills to show skill proficiency for 2 of 2 employees sampled (Staff B and C). The facility identified a census of 67 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow physician ' s orders for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for insulin administration (Resident #167). The facility reported a census of 67 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to document education and/or administration of COVID-19 immunizations for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations (Residents #4, #31, and #267). The facility reported a census of 67 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on personnel record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure mandatory Dependent Adult Abuse training had been completed within 6 months of employment for 1 of 5 staff reviewed (Staff F). The facility reported a census of 67 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide supervision to keep one of three residents safe from an accident with injury (Resident #6). While providing care to a resident in bed who required extensive assistance of two persons with bed mobility, they completed the task with only one person. As they rolled Resident #6, he fell out of bed, and received a hip fracture. In addition, the facility failed to lock the medication cart while unsupervised. During the time the lock remained unlock, at least one resident sat need the medication cart.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to provide pain medications for 1 of 10 residents reviewed (Resident #3). Resident #3 missed 14 doses of fentanyl (pain medication) patch. The documented assessments revealed that she had an increase in pain from not every day and mild to everyday and moderate.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staffing assignment sheets, and staff interviews the facility failed to have eight hours of continuous Registered Nurse (RN) coverage in 24-hours in the month of September. The facility reported a census of 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide housekeeping services in a manner to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility reported a census of 55 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, staff, and resident interviews the facility failed to provide 4 of 4 residents reviewed with two baths a week (Residents #1, #3, #7, and #9).
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, observations, staff, and resident interviews the facility failed to complete a shift to shift narcotic count. The facility reported a census of 56.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, staff and resident interviews and observations the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 10 residents reviewed (Resident #9).
14 fire safety citations on file: 4 on April 23, 2026, 3 on April 9, 2025, 7 on February 22, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 22, 2024 | Fine | $16,068 |
| February 22, 2024 | Payment Denial | 24 days from March 22, 2024 |
| October 5, 2023 | Fine | $13,039 |
| October 5, 2023 | Payment Denial | 2 days from November 3, 2023 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Iowa | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.55 | 3.82 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.02 | 3.37 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.33 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.57 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 55.4% | 44.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 54.5% | 42.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.07 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.76 on weekdays and 3.02 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.55 in April to June 2025 to 3.55 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.55 | 0.65 | 3.76 | 3.02 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 74 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.40 | 0.60 | 3.54 | 3.03 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 72 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.45 | 0.50 | 3.59 | 3.07 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 74 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.55 | 0.41 | 3.72 | 3.14 | 0.8% | 1 of 91 | 74 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Iowa, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.80 | 0.71 | 3.98 | 3.36 | 4.7% | 0.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iowa, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.92 | $17.96 to $21.95 | 22,670 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.11 | $27.12 to $34.06 | 5,510 |
| Registered nurses | $37.80 | $32.83 to $41.32 | 34,420 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Iowa | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.3 | 17.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.4 | 16.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.6 | 19.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.2 | 20.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.1 | 13.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Silver Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation Center LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Iowa: 28 better, 21 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Iowa: 1 better, 1 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 50 eligible stays.
8.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Iowa: 0 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.
57.1% this home
Median of homes: Iowa56.7% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 35 residents counted.
2.0% this home
Median of homes: Iowa0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 49 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Iowa1.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 49 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Iowa100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SILVER OAK NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC. CMS links this home to Ivy Healthcare Group, a group of 4 nursing homes averaging 1.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Jong, Alsion | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/15/2025 | |
| Younger, Clete | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2016 | |
| De Jong, Alsion | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/15/2025 | |
| Hyman, Chaim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/14/2025 | |
| Younger, Clete | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2016 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Iowa. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.