Mountain Villa Nursing Home
2729 Porter Ave, El Paso, TX 79930 · El Paso County · (915) 566-2111
48 certified beds, about 38 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675768 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 4, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 23 health citations since August 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.49 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.35 of those hours.
43.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
December 4, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for two residents (Residents #5, and #8) of seven residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to have a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #5 to address residents' blood thinner medication prescription, Eliquis. The facility failed to have a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #8 to address residents' diabetes diagnosis. These failures could affect residents and put them at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings Include:Resident #5 Record review of Resident # 5's admission record dated 12/04/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
- E Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff for 1 of 6 facility staff (LVN C) reviewed for trainings consistent with their expected roles, in that; -The facility failed to provide LVN C with training consistent with their expected roles. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents with potential harm due to staff not having up to date training.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident; and failed to have an established system in place for accurate reconciliation of all controlled drugs for 1 (East wing) of 2 medication carts that had residents with orders for controlled substances. The facility failed to ensure Licensed staff signed the form after counting and verifying that all controlled substances in the East Wing medication cart had been accounted for with the on-coming and off-going nurses on 12/03/25. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic response of prescribed medications and drug diversion of controlled substances. [...]
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions for one (medication aide's medication cart) of two medications carts reviewed. The Medication Aide B failed to ensure to update label Resident #31's medication Sertraline 100 MG on 12/03/25 with the current dosage instructions to Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day, to give 25 MG tablet for total dose of 125 MG.This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic response of prescribed medications. Record review of Resident #31's face sheet dated 12/03/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date 02/18/2022. [...]
March 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident medical, nursing and mental and psychosocial needs for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for care plans. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 's pacemaker was addressed on her care plan. This failure placed the resident at risk for not having their individual needs met in a timely manner and could result in injury and a decline in physical well-being.
November 18, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property, for 1 of 3 (CNA A) staff reviewed for EMR. The facility did not have CNA A's EMR on file upon hire. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property.
September 12, 2024Standard inspection · 9 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat residents with respect, dignity, and care for each resident in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #32) reviewed for respect and dignity. The facility failed to ensure staff treated Resident #3 and Resident #32 with respect and dignity, with staff removing residents' trays prior to being completed. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life and lead to a loss of self-esteem and isolation.
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 4 (Resident #2, Resident #27, Resident #28, and Resident #36) of 13 residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's comprehensive care plan addressed Resident's code status and fall mat. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's comprehensive care plan addressed Resident #27's code status and PASRR services. [...]
- E Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the use of the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for 5 (04/13/2024; 05/11/2024; 05/12/2024; 05/25/2024; 06/08/2024) of 91 days reviewed for RN coverage. The facility failed to provide evidence that a Registered Nurse (RN) worked 8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week on 04/13/2024; 05/11/2024; 05/12/2024; 05/25/2024; and 06/08/2024. This failure placed the residents at risk for not having decisions made that would have required an RN to make in the management of the residents' healthcare needs and in managing and monitoring of the direct care staff.
- E Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (5%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 12% based on 3 errors out of 25 opportunities, which involved 2 of 6 residents (Resident #28 & Resident #198) reviewed for medication errors. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA administered the correct dose of calcium and vitamin D to Resident #28 according to the physician orders. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA administered olmesartan medoxomil (for blood pressure) and amlodipine besylate (for blood pressure) to Resident #198 according to physician orders. These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes.
- E Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for 3 of 6 (Resident #2, Resident #25, and Resident #33) residents who received a pureed meal reviewed during the lunch meals served reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure residents, receiving a puree texture diet, were provided the food according to the menu, included a dinner roll on 09/10/2024 and a dinner roll and ice cream on 09/11/2024. This failure could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk of poor intake, chemical imbalance, and/or weight loss.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The facility failed to ensure open items in the freezer, refrigerator, and dry food storage were dated and labeled. The facility failed to ensure that persons serving food handled food properly. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses and cross-contamination.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 (CNA B and LVN D) of 4 staff observed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA B removed gloves and performed hand hygiene at the appropriate time while providing resident incontinent care. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN D sanitized hands at appropriate times when changing gloves during wound care. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN D sanitized rubber tip of insulin flex pen prior to applying needle to insulin flex pen during administration of insulin to resident. These failures place residents at risk for unnecessary infections while in facility.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate residents needs and preferences and accommodation of needs, for 1 (Resident #2) of 13 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's call light was within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life and lead to a loss of self-esteem and isolation.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care plan and provide a summary of their baseline care plan to residents for 2 (Resident #46 and Resident #198) of 13 residents reviewed for care plan completion. 1. The facility failed to complete Resident #46 and Resident #198's baseline care plan within the required 48-hour timeframe. This failure could place residents who were newly admitted at risk for not receiving necessary care and services or having important care needs identified.
August 9, 2023Standard inspection · 8 citations
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its written polices, and procedures that prohibit abuse, neglect and exploitation for 10 of 16 staff (Dietary Supervisor, Activities Director, CNA D, CNA E, CNA F, Nurse Aide G, CNA H, CMA K, CMA L, and [NAME] B) reviewed for neglect and abuse policies . The facility failed to conduct annual EMR/NAR screening for staff. This failure could put residents at risk of receiving services from employees who with a history of misconduct and/or were ineligible to provide services in this setting.
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on the observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that the residents environment remains free of accidents hazards for 1 (Resident #9) of 20 residents and to ensure 7 of 10 facility rooms were safe from hazards reviewed for accident hazards. 1. The facility failed to ensure that 5 resident-use bathroom sinks had hot water temperatures below 110 degrees F and did not put residents at risk of injury. 2. The facility failed to make sure the Resident #9's fall mat was placed according to plan of care 3. The facility failed to ensure that 1 utility closet and 1 housekeeping storage room remained closed/locked due to chemicals being stored in the housekeeping room and industry equipment/pipes in the utilizes closet. These failures could place residents at risk of injury.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on the observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation/storage, in that: 1. Foods in dry store, walk in, and freezer were not dated or labeled properly. 2. Food containers and food bags were not properly sealed in the kitchen and walk-in. 3. Hot food had been placed in the refrigerator while hot. 4. A dented can was not removed from shelf rotation. 5. the dish washer temperature was not at or above 140 degrees. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk of food borne illness.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #30) reviewed for care plans in that: The facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #9's that reflected as needed oxygen therapy. This deficient practice could place residents in the facility at risk of not receiving the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their needs.
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is fed by enteral means receives the appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for enteral feeding. Resident #9 was on continuous feeding and while feeding. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's head of the bed was elevated at a 45-degree angle per care plan These failures could place residents receiving enteral feedings at risk of aspiration.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #30) of 4 residents observed for oxygen management. Resident #30 was on oxygen which did not have an oxygen sign posted outside of her bedroom. Resident #30 was outside in the front patio of the facility with an oxygen tank that was in the red indicating refill oxygen. These failures could place residents on oxygen therapy at risk of an explosion or fire, injury, incorrect or inadequate oxygen support, and decline in health.
- D Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on the observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 1 (Dumpster) garbage dumpster containers reviewed for food safety requirements. 1. One dumpster in the back alley of the facility had trash on the floor outside and around the dumpsters. 2. One dumpster had its lid open. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of food borne illness, illnesses, or be provided an unsafe, unsanitary and uncomfortable environment.
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post required nurse staffing information in a prominent place readily accessible to resident and visitors The Facility failed to ensure nurse staffing information was posted. This failure could put staff, residents, and resident representatives at risk of being unaware of actual staffing levels and available staff.
Fire safety inspections
29 fire safety citations on file: 23 on December 4, 2025, 4 on September 12, 2024, 2 on August 9, 2023.
Every fire safety citation29 citations
- F Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
- F Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.
- F Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.
- F Establish roles under a Waiver declared by secretary.
- F Develop a communication plan.
- F Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- F Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- F Meet other general requirements that are deficient.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- E Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
- E Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- E Ensure that waiting areas, nurse’s stations, gift shops, and cooking facilities, open to the corridor are properly protected.
- E Install properly constructed windows in hallway walls or doors.
- E Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- E Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- E Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have restrictions on the use of flammable curtains.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- C Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.49 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.15 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.50 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.65 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.9% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.08 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.63 on weekdays and 3.15 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.27 in April to June 2025 to 3.49 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.49 | 0.35 | 3.63 | 3.15 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 38 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.55 | 0.31 | 3.69 | 3.18 | 0.0% | 2 of 92 | 38 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.46 | 0.31 | 3.60 | 3.10 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 39 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.27 | 0.31 | 3.42 | 2.89 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 42 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 35.2 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 32.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.8 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: J SQUARED, INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maharlika Resources, Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/1994 | |
| Rivera, Donovan | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 03/21/2018 | |
| Rivera, Donovan | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 09/27/2011 | |
| Maharlika Resources, Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/01/1994 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on December 4, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on September 12, 2024: "Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 4, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on August 9, 2023: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Nazareth Living Care Center El Paso, 2.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 56 citations
- Mountain View Health & Rehabilitation El Paso, 2.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 72 citations
- Grace Pointe Wellness Center El Paso, 2.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 55 citations
- Franklin Heights Nursing & Rehabilitation El Paso, 5.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 76 citations
- Ambrosio Guillen Texas State Veterans Home El Paso, 6.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- White Acres Wellness & Rehabilitation El Paso, 6.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 40 citations
- The Bartlett Skilled Nursing and Assisted Living El Paso, 6.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- St. Teresa Nursing & Rehab Center El Paso, 7.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 75 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Mountain Villa Nursing Home's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Mountain Villa Nursing Home 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Mountain Villa Nursing Home get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 4, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Mountain Villa Nursing Home been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Mountain Villa Nursing Home accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Mountain Villa Nursing Home?
- CMS lists 4 owners and managers. Legal business name: J SQUARED, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.