Olivia Restorative Care Center
1003 West Maple Avenue, Olivia, MN 56277 · Renville County · (320) 523-1652
60 certified beds, about 45 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1985
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245290 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 10, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 41 health citations since September 2023, 6 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.62 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.73 of those hours.
58.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 41 health citations on file.
July 22, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications used to manage pain were provided timely after being ordered, despite a supply of the medication being available in the onsite emergency kit (E-Kit), for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R3) reviewed.
December 3, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse timely to law enforcement and the State Agency for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for allegations of abuse.
August 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and document review, the facility failed to correctly transcribe medication orders according to physician instructions, for 2 of 4 (R10 and R11) residents reviewed for transcription of orders. This error resulted in R10 missing four doses of her long- acting insulin that led to her re hospitalization to intensive care units (ICU) due to diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), a serious complication of diabetes.
July 10, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to have licensed nursing coverage on staff for 24 hours a day, based on payroll and other verifiable, auditable data during 1 of 1 quarter reviewed - Quarter 2, 2025, (January 1 to March 31st), to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), according to specifications established by CMS. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents living in the facility.
- F Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was on duty a minimum of 8 consecutive hours per day, 7 days per week, for 6 of 90 days reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents living in the facility.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained to ensure dietary staff were wearing a hair net and/or beard nets while in 1 of 1 kitchen and during meal services. The facility also failed to ensure 1 of 2 dining room refrigerators remained clean, and food was dated within the refrigerator to ensure it was not used beyond expiration. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure all Chlorine test strips for monitoring the dishwasher chemical level were not expired.
- F Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement 1 of 1 facility assessment and ensure the required nursing staff were scheduled and working to provide care and services to residents.
- F Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to submit accurate staffing data based on payroll and other verifiable, auditable data during 1 of 1 quarter reviewed - Quarter 2, 2025, (January 1 to March 31st), to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), according to specifications established by CMS. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents living in the facility.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to disinfect 1of 2 glucometers (capillary blood glucose sampling device) after use to prevent transmission of blood borne diseases. Additionally, the facility failed to complete accurate staff illness surveillance for 2 of 2 staff.
- D Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to update code status for 1 of 16 resident (R40) who requested to have his code status changed.
May 30, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide assessed supervision needs for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R4) who were at risk for elopement. R1 was able to leave the facility undetected for one hour despite having a wander guard on, which resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ). The IJ began on 5/21/25, when R1, while wearing a wander guard bracelet, successfully eloped from the building without the alarm sounding. R1 was allowed out of the locked front entrance by an unknown responsible party (had the pin code to the locked door), crossed a highway, and was found by community members approximately one mile from the facility an hour later, winded but unharmed. The administrator, director of nursing (DON), and nurse consultant were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 5/29/25 at 9:30 a.m. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to have a system to ensure residents who were cognitively intact, and not an elopement risk could freely enter and exit the facility for 1 of 1 residents (R5) reviewed for resident rights.
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure contracted resident care staff were competently trained on facility resident procedures, as well as provided access to electronic medical records (EMR) to implement person-centered resident care needs, interventions related to resident care to ensure safety and reduce the risk of complication (i.e. elopement). This had the potential to affect all 46 residents currently residing in the facility.
May 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess supervision needs, develop individualized person-centered interventions to mitigate risks and hazards for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for elopement risk. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) when R1 left the facilty without staff knowledge and was found 12 blocks away, unharmed by a community member. The immediate jeopardy began on 5/5/25 when R1 left the facility and was found by a community member several blocks away confused, and returned to the facility by local police. The IJ was identified on 5/8/25. The administrator, director of nursing (DON), director of operations, and director of clinical operations were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 5/8/25 at 5:10 p.m. [...]
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement their Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation and Elopements and Wandering Resident policy for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for elopement.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an elopement from the facility was recognized and reported to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for elopement.
April 9, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- L Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to implement infection control strategies for respiratory protection to mitigate the risk and spread of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV- an infection of the respiratory tract). As a result, the facility developed an outbreak where 8 residents (R10, R13, R14, R11, R12, R17, R6, and R16) tested positive for RSV and 3 residents were suspected to have RSV (R15, R7, R18); 2 residents (R10 and R12) were seen in the emergency department (ED) and 3 residents (R11, R13, and R14) were hospitalized at a higher level of care. This resulted in a system wide failure in infection control procedures to prevent the spread of illness within the facility resulting in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) which placed all residents at a high likelihood of serious illness and/or death by contracting a communicable respiratory disease. [...]
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess falls for root cause, revise the care plan and implement appropriate interventions to prevent and/or reduce the risk of falls with major injury for 2 of 3 residents (R20, R22) who had falls. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy for R20 who had a history of traumatic brain injuries and sustained a fall that resulted in a subdural hematoma and was hospitalized . The IJ began on 3/28/25 after R20 had a fall, the facility failed to assess and implement appropriate interventions to prevent/mitigate risk for falls which resulted in R20's fall on 4/4/25 in which R20 suffered an intercranial brain injury and hospitalization. The Administrator, director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on 4/8/25 at 6:32p.m. [...]
February 14, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- G Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete an assessment including, vital signs and general condition, when a change in condition was reported to a nurse for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for quality of care. This resulted in harm for R1 who continued to decline and later that day required emergency medical care and passed away.
- F Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to employ a full-time director of nursing (DON). This had the opportunity to affect all 36 residents.
- E Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide training to individuals providing services under a contractual agreement, consistent with their expected roles. This had the opportunity to affect all 36 residents of the facility.
September 26, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 carpeted center hall transition space to the center hall wood floor, 1 of 1 center hall wood floor transition space to the north carpeted hall, and 1 of 1 north carpeted hall transition space to resident (R14)'s tile floor was maintained to promote a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment. This had the potential to affect 11 residents that ate in the north dining room and/or lived on the north hall.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with their meal in a dignified manner for 3 of 6 residents (R1, R11, R23) who were dependent on staff to assist them with meal intake.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded to reflect a discharge record for 1 of 12 residents (R37) reviewed for MDS accuracy.
- D Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 1 resident (R29) had hearing aids appropriately replaced when staff failed to remove her hearing aid during bathing, causing it to be damaged by water, and assist R29 with replacement due to staff negligence.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to obtain and administer ordered pain medication patched (lidocaine) medication for 1 of 6 residents (R189).
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to act upon pharmacy recommendations to modify administration times and limit potential interaction and/or side effects for medication administered to 1 of 3 residents (R34).
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents (R24 and R33) were offered pneumococcal PCV-15 or PCV-20 vaccination or declination form, per Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations, reviewed for vaccinations.
July 26, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to assess and identify which mechanical lift and corresponding slings were to be used based off each resident's height and weight, for 10 of 10 residents (R2, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11 and R12) who utilized a total mechanical lift for transfers. This resulted in a pattern of no actual harm but potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy.
March 29, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 staff member hired as a registered nurse (RN) was not employed by the facility with a disciplinary action in effect against his professional license by the Minnesota (MN) Board of Nursing. In addition the staff member hired as a RN did not hold a RN license, the staff's licensed practical nurse (LPN) license was suspended. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility.
March 13, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician ordered wound treatments and failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices during wound care including hand hygiene to prevent or mitigate the risk of wound deterioration and/or infection for 2 of 2 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for pressure ulcers.
September 13, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to have a comprehensive IC surveillance program that included employee illness and criteria to return to work. There facility also failed to ensure existing policies were reviewed annually to ensure they were updated and complete. This had the ability to affect all 41 residents.
- F Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased of interview and document review, the facility failed to perform antibiotic stewardship to include antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic usage and determine if the prescribed antibiotics resolved the identified infectious process for 15 of 41 sampled residents (R2, R6, R9, R10, R12, R24, R26, R27, R31, R34, R35, R37, R244, R245, and R246) identified in the facility's infection control surveillance. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents who were or may receive antibiotic therapy in the future.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to verify and document lorazepam 1 milliliter (ml) vials located in the facilities emergency kit kept in the medication room refrigerator.
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 residents (R2, R6, R17, R33 and R144) were offered and/or administer vaccination for pneumonia upon admission or when eligible. Furthermore, the facility failed to update their policy and educate staff to ensure the facility offered and/or provided any initial or updated pneumococcal vaccine to residents per Centers for Disease Control (CDC) vaccination recommendations. This had the ability to affect all 41 residents.
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to honor 1 of 1 (R18) residents' choice for male aid to assist with bathing.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess 1 of 1 resident (R241) following a fall resulting in delayed evaluation and treatment by a physician.
- D Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility to develop an individualized care plan to address the emotional and psychosocial needs of 1 of 1 resident (R17) with a history of PTSD and trauma.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to follow nursing standards of practice for 1 of 25 medication administrationobservations. The facility also failed to follow the 5 rights of medication administration to ensure staff dispensed the correct dose of diazepam 2.5 milligrams, for 1 of 1 resident (R142). The facility also failed to check the medication administration record against the medication label prior to giving medication for 4 of 17 residents (R17, R19, R20, and R142). The facility also failed to ensure 1of 1 resident (R31) had medication available for administration.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to monitor for side effects for 1 of 5 residents (R25) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
September 6, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the State Agency (SA) were notified within 2 hours of staff witnessing allegations of resident-to-resident sexual abuse for 1 of 1 residents (R1) when R2 inappropriately placed his hands inside R1's shirt.
Fire safety inspections
13 fire safety citations on file: 3 on July 10, 2025, 5 on September 26, 2024, 5 on September 13, 2023.
Every fire safety citation13 citations
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- E Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Implement emergency and standby power systems.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- E Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.62 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.73 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.20 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.49 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.41 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.7% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 70.0% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 2.94 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.79 on weekdays and 3.20 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 22.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.90 in April to June 2025 to 3.62 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.62 | 0.73 | 3.79 | 3.20 | 22.9% | 0 of 90 | 45 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.52 | 0.60 | 3.67 | 3.15 | 10.9% | 0 of 92 | 42 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.09 | 0.55 | 4.21 | 3.80 | 9.1% | 0 of 92 | 40 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.90 | 0.47 | 3.99 | 3.68 | 12.0% | 0 of 91 | 43 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.1 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.9 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.8 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.1 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.6 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.9 | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.6 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: RENVILLE OLIVIA HOLDINGS LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rohinsky, Steven | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 100% | 11/01/2020 |
| Sundstrom, Jennifer | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 11/01/2020 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on July 10, 2025: "Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on July 22, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on July 10, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on December 3, 2025: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.20 hours per resident per day, below the Minnesota average of 3.71.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Renvilla Health Center Renville, 10.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- River Valley Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC Redwood Falls, 17.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Buffalo Lake Health Care Center Buffalo Lake, 18.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Franklin Restorative Care Center Franklin, 18.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 45 citations
- Clara City Care Center Clara City, 22.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Bethesda Willmar, 22.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Cura of Willmar Willmar, 23.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 21 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Olivia Restorative Care Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Olivia Restorative Care Center 1 out of 5 stars overall, with 1 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Olivia Restorative Care Center get at its last inspection?
- 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 10, 2025. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has Olivia Restorative Care Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Olivia Restorative Care Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Olivia Restorative Care Center?
- CMS lists 2 owners and managers. Legal business name: RENVILLE OLIVIA HOLDINGS LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.