Home / Massachusetts / Nantucket
Our Island Home
East Creek Road, Nantucket, MA 02554 · Nantucket County · (508) 228-0462
45 certified beds, about 33 residents a day · Government - City · Medicare and Medicaid since 2007
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 225772 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 9, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Massachusetts average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
None of its 11 health citations since May 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.97 hours per resident per day, against 3.86 across Massachusetts and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.13 of those hours.
36.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Massachusetts average 38.2%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.
April 9, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were fully aware of the grievance process. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure their grievance policy included notification that residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances anonymously, should they choose not to alert a staff member of their concern(s), and failed to include the contact information of the grievance official with whom a grievance can be filed, that is, business address (mailing and email) and business phone number, and the contact information of independent entities with whom grievances may be filed, that is, the pertinent State agency, Quality Improvement Organization, State Survey Agency and State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program or protection and advocacy system.
- E Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of practice for three Residents (#13, #17, and #25), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #13, to ensure physician's orders for opioid administration were followed; and2. For Resident #17 to ensure physician's orders for opioid administration were followed; and3. For Resident #25, to ensure physician's orders for inhaled medication were followed.
- D Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a [NAME] Monitor was appointed, and treatment plan approved by the court for one Resident (#13) who was admitted to the facility and administered an antipsychotic medication, from a total sample of 12 residents.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were accurately labeled and stored in accordance with acceptable professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Ensure a treatment cart was locked when not in direct supervision of a licensed nurse;2. Ensure Resident #10's Albuterol Sulfate HFA inhaler (used to treat shortness of breath) was stored securely; and3. Ensure Resident #25's medications were stored in their original packaging.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure staff handled medications in a sanitary manner to prevent potential transmission of infections; and-Ensure staff followed hand hygiene procedures prior to handling medication(s) and after administering medication(s).
May 8, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff provided care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for one Resident (#6), out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, for Resident #6, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was not administered outside of parameters identified in the Physician's orders.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, document review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow infection control prevention practices to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one Resident (#13) out of one resident on transmission-based precautions, out of a total sample of 13 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff wore the appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) while providing care for Resident #13, who was on droplet and contact precautions.
May 9, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide education, assess eligibility, and offer Pneumococcal Vaccinations per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations and facility policy for three Residents (#10, #5 and #21), out of a sample of five residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that staff offered, assessed, and provided education on the recommended Pneumococcal vaccine 20-valent (PCV20) (an active immunizing agent used to prevent infection caused by certain types of pneumococcal bacteria).
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed for one Resident (#12), of 12 sampled residents, to maintain their catheter drainage bag below the level of the bladder at all times to prevent potential complications.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections within the facility for one Resident (#17), out of a total sample of 12 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions for a Resident who has a tracheostomy stoma and is at high risk for infection.
- D Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective training program for all staff, which included laundry personnel, training on standards, policies, and procedures for the facility's infection prevention and control program as it relates to handling contaminated laundry.
Fire safety inspections
16 fire safety citations on file: 8 on April 9, 2026, 8 on May 8, 2025.
Every fire safety citation16 citations
- E Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
- E Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.
- E Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- E Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- E Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.97 | 3.86 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.13 | 0.65 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.75 | 3.48 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.57 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.28 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 36.4% | 38.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 42.9% | 42.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.11 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.06 on weekdays and 3.75 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 11.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.12 in April to June 2025 to 3.97 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.97 | 1.13 | 4.06 | 3.75 | 11.8% | 0 of 90 | 33 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.74 | 0.96 | 3.82 | 3.53 | 11.3% | 0 of 92 | 38 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.69 | 0.65 | 3.81 | 3.39 | 6.3% | 1 of 92 | 37 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.12 | 0.75 | 4.23 | 3.84 | 15.1% | 0 of 91 | 38 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Massachusetts, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.61 | 3.94 | 3.41 | 5.0% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Massachusetts | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.5 | 16.4 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.4 | 15.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.6 | 21.4 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.3 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.9 | 11.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: TOWN OF NANTUCKET.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Town of Nantucket | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/15/1981 |
| Chretien, Rachel | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/07/2011 | |
| Dyer, Heather | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/12/2017 | |
| Chretien, Rachel | Corporate director | Individual | 02/07/2011 | |
| Gibson, C. Elizabeth | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/18/1995 | |
| Town of Nantucket | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/07/2011 | |
| Chretien, Rachel | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/07/2011 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on April 9, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Navigator Homes of Martha's Vineyard Edgartown, 24.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 16 citations
Common questions
- What is Our Island Home's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Our Island Home 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Our Island Home get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 9, 2026. The Massachusetts average is 6.8.
- Has Our Island Home been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Our Island Home accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Our Island Home?
- CMS lists 7 owners and managers. Legal business name: TOWN OF NANTUCKET.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.