Park Villa
114 S High St., Clyde, KS 66938 · Cloud County · (785) 446-2818
34 certified beds, about 32 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2007
CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175492 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 15, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 19 health citations since July 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.91 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.68 of those hours.
34.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
707/22
607/24
604/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 19 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
3E
5F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
April 15, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for the 31 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food by professional standards for food service safety in the facility's kitchen. The facility failed to label, seal, and date food stored in the refrigerator/freezer and dry storage area. The facility also failed to consistently log freezer/refrigerator temperatures.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to initiate timely interventions to prevent the development of a Stage 2 pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) for Resident (R) 27.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to discard expired stock medication from the North Hall medication cart.
- D Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care, which coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice (a type of health care that focused on the terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life), was developed and available for Resident (R)12 and R5. This placed R12 and R5 at risk for inappropriate end of life cares.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement acceptable infection control practices related to hand hygiene when staff failed to change gloves or wash hands between cares for Resident (R)6.
July 24, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for the 35 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, in one of one kitchen. This placed the residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchen at risk for foodborne illness.
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteThe facility identified a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for immunizations, Resident (R)10, R2, R1, R3, and R18, to include pneumococcal (a disease that refers to a range of illnesses that affect various parts of the body and are caused by infection) vaccinations. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to evaluate for eligibility and offer or obtain an informed declination or a physician-documented contraindication for the pneumococcal PCV20 vaccination per the latest guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This placed the residents at risk for pneumococcal infection and related complications.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported the lack of a 14-day stop date or the required physician documentation and specified duration, for Resident (R)10's ongoing as-needed (PRN) antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people) medication. This placed R10 at risk for unintended effects related to psychotropic drug medications.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a 14-day stop date or a specified duration with rationale for R10's ongoing as-needed (PRN) antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people) medication. This placed R10 at risk for unintended effects related to psychotropic (alters mood or thought) drug medications.
- D Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for hospice (a type of health care that focuses on the terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life) services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care, which coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice, was developed and available for Resident (R)10. This placed R10 at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care.
July 6, 2022Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to monitor and adhere to cleaning and disinfecting shared equipment which consisted of a digital thermometer and oxygen saturation clip, (a device used to monitor oxygen in the blood) placing the residents at risk for infection.
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide comfortable sound levels promoting a homelike dining environment. This placed the residents at risk for an unpleasant dining experience.
- E Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow-up or resolve resident grievances, placing the residents at risk for unresolved concerns.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with eight reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan with the use of the power lift recliner for Resident (R)25, placing the resident at risk for accidents and injury related to the power lift chair.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with eight reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify and implement interventions to prevent accidents for Resident (R) 25 who had two falls from a recliner and sustained a laceration and injury on her nose and face. This placed the resident at risk for further injury.
- D Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with one reviewed for side rails. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess Resident (R)11's side rails for safe use. This placed the resident at risk for injury.
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the actual scheduled working hours for nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift.
Fire safety inspections
13 fire safety citations on file: 8 on April 15, 2026, 2 on July 24, 2024, 3 on July 6, 2022.
Every fire safety citation13 citations
- F Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- F Install a fire alarm system that can be heard throughout the facility.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- C Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- C Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- C Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
- C Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- F Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.91 | 4.07 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.41 | 3.60 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.65 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.58 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 34.2% | 48.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 42.0% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.18 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.12 on weekdays and 3.41 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.24 in April to June 2025 to 3.91 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.91 | 0.68 | 4.12 | 3.41 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 32 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.69 | 0.70 | 3.85 | 3.28 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 33 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.02 | 0.74 | 4.28 | 3.36 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 33 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.24 | 0.80 | 4.48 | 3.66 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 32 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Kansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.01 | 0.67 | 4.19 | 3.56 | 4.8% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Kansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.2 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.3 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.2 | 2.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 4.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.0 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.1 | 16.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 18.1 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: CLYDE DEVELOPMENT INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blochlinger, Lawrence | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 12/12/2021 | |
| Bremerman, Mary Sue | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/12/2018 | |
| Cassidy, Joseph | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 05/01/2017 | |
| Germann, Heather | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/16/2022 | |
| Irwin, Bruce | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/01/2017 | |
| Blochlinger, Lawrence | Corporate director | Individual | 12/12/2021 | |
| Germann, Heather | Corporate director | Individual | 03/16/2022 | |
| Genereux, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/17/2014 | |
| Koch, Terry | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/17/2014 | |
| Wilson, Reed | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/17/2014 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2026: "Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2026: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 15, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.41 hours per resident per day, below the Kansas average of 3.60.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Sunset Home Inc Concordia, 14.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 41 citations
- Linn Community Nursing Home Linn, 17.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Belleville Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Belleville, 19.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 29 citations
- Clay Center Presbyterian Manor Clay Center, 21.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 15 citations
Common questions
- What is Park Villa's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Park Villa 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Park Villa get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 15, 2026. The Kansas average is 9.5.
- Has Park Villa been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Park Villa accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Park Villa?
- CMS lists 10 owners and managers. Legal business name: CLYDE DEVELOPMENT INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.