Presbyterian Village North Special Care Ctr
8600 Skyline Dr, Dallas, TX 75243 · Dallas County · (214) 355-9000
88 certified beds, about 71 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare since 2007
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676135 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 19, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 12 health citations since March 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $36,505 in the last three years; the largest was $22,925, and the latest is dated March 12, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.46 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.75 of those hours.
43.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 12 health citations on file.
September 17, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team determined self-administration of medication was safe for 1 (Resident # 1) of 8 resident's reviewed for medication self-administration. The facility failed to prevent Resident #1 from possessing and administering an inhaler without an assessment to determine if she could safely self-administer the medication. This failure could place all residents who self-administer medications at risk of not receiving the therapeutic dose of their medication as ordered.
July 2, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 5 facility shower room and hallway (MU) were reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure shower chairs and shower curtains were thoroughly cleaned and stored away from Memory care residents, staff, and visitors. 2. The facility failed to discard used water bottles located on shower chair on the memory unit. These failures could place residents at risk of living in an unclean and unsanitary environment which could lead to a decreased quality of life. An observation on 07/02/2025 at 12:06 PM the facility hydration cart was left open unattended with the ice exposed and the metal scoop. After waiting for approximately 4 minutes, CNA-M was observed coming out of a resident’s room [ROOM NUMBER] minutes later. [...]
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #21 and #33) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to change and date Residents #21, bag nasal Cannula and CPAP mask when not in use and date and change oxygen and nasal cannula tubing and humidifier bottle every week.2. The facility failed to bag and date Residents #33's bag and date CPAP mask when not in use to prevent infection prevention. These failures could place residents at risk for respiratory infections. [...]
June 19, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #147), reviewed for pharmaceutical services. MA A failed to dispose of Resident #147's used Fentanyl Transdermal Patch, 12 micrograms/hour (applied to the skin to treat moderate to severe chronic pain around the clock. Fentanyl is extremely potent. 2 to 3 milligrams of this drug can lead to death due to decreased breathing which can quickly lead to coma and death.) per facility policy. This failure could place residents at risk for obtaining Fentanyl patches out of the trash and overdosing on them.
- D Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide coffee that was palatable to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #187 and confidential resident), reviewed for Dining services. The facility did not serve beverages that was palatable. Resident #187 and an anonymous resident said the coffee tasted bad. This failure could place residents who drank beverages from the kitchen at risk of a diminished quality of life.
March 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for one of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. CNA A failed to transfer Resident #1 in accordance with her care plan and facility protocol when she independently transferred Resident #1 via mechanical lift (a mechanical device used to safely transfer individuals with limited mobility, typically those who are unable to bear weight or have difficulty moving independently, from one place to another, such as a bed, chair, or wheelchair). As a result, Resident #1 fell from the mechanical lift and sustained a head laceration that required staples. The noncompliance was identified as past noncompliance (PNC). The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 02/21/25 and ended on 03/04/25. [...]
May 16, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
- J Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, and to formulate an advance directive for 1 (Resident #71) of 10 residents reviewed for advanced directives. Resident #71 was administered CPR by LVN H on [DATE], in not honoring the resident's advance directives. An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:48PM. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy and a severity level of isolated because the facility was continuing to implement their Plan of Removal. This failure could affect residents with an accessible DNR and could result in residents not getting their Do Not Resuscitate wishes honored.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with professional standards, including expiration dates and with appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions for 2 (Resident #22 and Resident # 323) of 8 residents reviewed for storage of drugs and Biologicals. The facility failed to ensure that MA D secured Resident # 22's medication before walking away from the medication cart. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #323's self-administration medications were secured and not left on the bedside table after administration. These failures could cause accidental ingestion of medication by a resident not prescribed the medication and could cause access, loss, and diversion of medications.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 (Residents #30) of 8 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure Residents #30 had the right to a dignified existence when staff stood over the resident while feeding the resident. This failure could affect the residents by placing them at risk for a loss of dignity, decreased self-worth and decreased self-esteem.
- D Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety for 1 (Resident #5) of 8 residents reviewed for refrigerators in the rooms. The facility failed to monitor Resident #5's refrigerator temperature and to clean out undated foods. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk for food-borne illness.
March 29, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure food was properly stored in the facility's dry storage room. 2. The facility failed to ensure expired foods were discarded. These failures could place all residents at risk for food-borne illness.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for one of five residents (Resident #48) observed for infection control. CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident # 48. This failure could place the residents at risk for infection.
Fire safety inspections
7 fire safety citations on file: 7 on May 16, 2024.
Every fire safety citation7 citations
- F Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
- F Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- E Ensure electrical receptacles or cover plates have distinctive color or marking.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| March 12, 2025 | Fine | $22,925 |
| May 16, 2024 | Fine | $13,580 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.46 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.75 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.99 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.68 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.04 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.0% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 53.3% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.73 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.65 on weekdays and 3.99 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.87 in April to June 2025 to 4.46 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.46 | 0.75 | 4.65 | 3.99 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 71 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.57 | 0.71 | 4.78 | 4.03 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 69 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.69 | 0.68 | 4.89 | 4.20 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 75 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.87 | 0.60 | 5.14 | 4.21 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 75 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 34.7 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.7 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.9 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.5 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.0 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.6 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: PRESBYTERIAN VILLAGE NORTH FOREFRONT LIVING.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ailey, Steven | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2016 | |
| Mallad, Timothy | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/2016 | |
| Polzin, Scott | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2022 | |
| Allen, Dustin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Johnson, Karen | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2022 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on September 17, 2025: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 19, 2025: "Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 2, 2025: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 19, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- The Highlands Guest Care Center Dallas, 0.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- The Legacy Midtown Park Dallas, 1.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- Avir at the Meadow Dallas, 1.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Pure Health Transitional Care at Texas Health Pres Dallas, 2.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 5 citations
- Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and Rehab Dallas, 3.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 53 citations
- Treemont Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center Dallas, 3.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 43 citations
- The Plaza at Edgemere Dallas, 3.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- C C Young Memorial Home Dallas, 3.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 8 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Presbyterian Village North Special Care Ctr's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Presbyterian Village North Special Care Ctr 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Presbyterian Village North Special Care Ctr get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 19, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Presbyterian Village North Special Care Ctr been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $36,505 in the last three years.
- Does Presbyterian Village North Special Care Ctr accept Medicaid?
- CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
- Who owns Presbyterian Village North Special Care Ctr?
- CMS lists 5 owners and managers. Legal business name: PRESBYTERIAN VILLAGE NORTH FOREFRONT LIVING.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.