C C Young Memorial Home
4849 W. Lawther Dr., Dallas, TX 75214 · Dallas County · (214) 827-8080
129 certified beds, about 119 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare since 1996
CMS high performing icon Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675592 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 15, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 8 health citations since August 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.30 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.95 of those hours.
43.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
208/23
110/24
401/26
107/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 8 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
4D
4E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 8, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the Administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for reporting allegations. [...]
January 15, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 13 residents (Resident #67, and Resident #146) reviewed for rights. The facility failed to ensure the staff in the main dining room served Resident #67, and Resident #146, at the same time the other residents were served the lunch meal. These failures could place residents at risk of feeling like their dignity was being violated or the facility was not their home.
- E Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to send and receive mail, and to receive letters, packages, and other materials delivered to the facility for the resident through the means other than a postal service for 7 of 7 residents reviewed for rights to forms of communication with privacy. The facility failed to deliver mail to the resident within twenty-four hours of delivery on premises or the facility's post office box according to their policy. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving mail in a timely manner and could result in a decline in residents' psychosocial well-being and quality of life During a confidential group interview, 5 of 7 residents stated mail was not distributed at the facility on Saturdays. 2 of 7 residents stated mail was never distributed to them. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff wore appropriate hair and beard restraint while in the kitchen. The facility failed to maintain the sanitizing solution used in the manual dishwashing process at the proper chemical concentration required for effective sanitation. These failures could place residents at risk for contamination, foodborne illness, and infection resulting in possible physical harm to residents receiving the food.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of four (CNA A) staff members and two of ten residents (Resident #27 and #103) reviewed for infection control procedures. CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene after direct contact with Residents #27, and #103 while serving meals in the dining room. This failure could place residents at risk for healthcare associated cross contamination and infections.
October 3, 2024Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments inaccessible to unauthorized staff, visitors, and residents for 1 (Resident #63) of 40 residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Resident #63 did not have medications stored at the bedside. This failure could place residents at risk of ingesting unprescribed medications resulting in adverse health consequences.
August 31, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to review the risks and benefits of bed rails and enabler pivot assist bars with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for three (Residents #81, #312, #314) of 37 resident rooms observed and reviewed for bed rails/pivot assist bars in that: The facility failed to have consents signed for the pivot assist quarter bed rails for Residents #81, #312, and #314. This failure could affect residents who used bed rails/pivot assist bars at risk of the resident/responsible party not being aware of the risk.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (CMA D) of two staff observed during medication pass reviewed for infection control. 1. CMA D failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff in between use with Resident #1 and Resident #91. These failures could affect all residents by causing cross contamination and placing them at risk for exposure to a contagious disease, infection, and possible hospitalization.
Fire safety inspections
5 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 15, 2026, 1 on October 3, 2024, 2 on August 31, 2023.
Every fire safety citation5 citations
- C Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
- C Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- C To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- C Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.30 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.95 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.81 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.19 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.16 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.1% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 11.1% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 3.73 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.50 on weekdays and 4.81 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.94 in April to June 2025 to 5.30 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.30 | 0.95 | 5.50 | 4.81 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 119 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.11 | 0.84 | 5.29 | 4.63 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 117 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.17 | 0.81 | 5.34 | 4.71 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 115 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.94 | 0.67 | 5.10 | 4.55 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 119 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.5 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.3 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 24.1 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 6.8 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 15, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 15, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on July 8, 2026: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on January 15, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Villages of Lake Highlands Dallas, 1.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Pure Health Transitional Care at Texas Health Pres Dallas, 1.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 5 citations
- Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and Rehab Dallas, 2.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 53 citations
- Avir at the Meadow Dallas, 2.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- The Legacy Midtown Park Dallas, 3.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- Golden Acres Living and Rehabilitation Center Dallas, 3.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- The Plaza at Edgemere Dallas, 3.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Presbyterian Village North Special Care Ctr Dallas, 3.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 12 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is C C Young Memorial Home's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates C C Young Memorial Home 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did C C Young Memorial Home get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 15, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has C C Young Memorial Home been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does C C Young Memorial Home accept Medicaid?
- CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
- Who owns C C Young Memorial Home?
- CMS lists 1 owner or manager. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.