Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Dallas

The Plaza at Edgemere

8502 Edgemere, Dallas, TX 75225 · Dallas County · (214) 615-7045

72 certified beds, about 60 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare since 2004

Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676002 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 22, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 13 health citations since August 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,278 in the last three years; the largest was $8,278, and the latest is dated March 27, 2026.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.29 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.76 of those hours.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
6D
5E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
March 27, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 2 (Residents #1 and #2) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #2 did not develop wounds due to ill-fitting (too small) briefs for both, and the use of a mechanical lift sling that was too small for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for pain and infection.
January 22, 2026Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety. The facility failed to ensure that only paper towels were placed in 3 of 3 handwashing sink garbage receptacles. The facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 handwashing sinks had a garbage receptacle. The facility failed to maintain the sanitizing solution used in the manual dishwashing process at the proper chemical concentration required for effective sanitation. The facility failed to ensure that stored canned goods had uncompromised seals and were free from dents. These failures could have placed residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination. Observation of the kitchen on January 20, 2026, at 10:06 a.m., revealed the following: [...]
  2. E
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    F851 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information for the fourth quarter (July 1, 2025, to September 30, 2025). The facility failed to submit complete PBJ staffing information to CMS for July 1, 2025, to September 30, 2025. This failure could place all residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment. Findings Included:Record review of the CASPER3 PBJ report reflected the facility failed to submit data for the FY quarter 4 (July 1, 2025- September 30, 2025). No other quarter triggered. An interview with the Administrator on 01/20/2026 at 9:30 am, revealed she was not employed by this facility during that reporting period. [...]
  3. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 29, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #14, and #71) of four residents observed for infection control in that: LVN A failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff (used to take blood pressure), and the thermometer in between vital sign checks for Resident #14, and Resident #71. This failure could place residents at risk for spread of infection through cross-contamination.
December 2, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 3, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Resident #2) of 4 residents reviewed for care plan review and revision. The facility failed to review and revise Resident #2's care plan after he fell on [DATE] and 06/22/2025. This failure could affect all residents and contribute to residents not receiving the care and services they needed to prevent falls.
October 3, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 kitchens reviewed for food storage, labeling, dating, and kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure foods in the refrigerator and freezer, were properly sealed from air-borne contaminations. 2. The facility failed to clean the food storage bins in the dry food storage area in the main kitchen. The facility failed to clean the Ice Machine on both the 3rd floor (Main Kitchen) and 2nd floor (Secondary Kitchen). These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and air-borne illnesses.
  2. E
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for three (Resident #6, Resident #15, and Resident #32) of eight residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. 1. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #6's nasal cannula (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) was properly stored. 2. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #15's CPAP mask (continuous positive airway pressure: machine used to deliver pressurized air through a mask to keep airways open) was stored properly. 3. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #32's CPAP mask was stored properly. [...]
  3. E
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    F851 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information, for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specification established by CMS for 1 of 4 FY quarters (FY Quarter 3 for 2024 (April 1-June 30) reviewed for administration. The facility failed to submit staffing data to CMS for (April 1- June 30). The facility's failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment.
  4. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #18 and Resident #198) of eight residents observed for Infection Control. 1. The facility failed to ensure that CNA A changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #18. 2. The facility failed to ensure that CNA B and the MDS Nurse changed their gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #198. These failures could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.
  5. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for one (Resident #29) of 5 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to treat Resident #29 with dignity and promote enhancement of his quality of life when the resident's catheter bag was not placed away from the door as care planned. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their right to a dignified existence maintained.
  6. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for one (Resident #32) of eight residents reviewed for Accuracy of Assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #32's Comprehensive MDS Assessment accurately reflected that Resident #32 was using a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure: machine used to deliver pressurized air through a mask to keep airways open). This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs, for diminished function of health, and for regressions in their overall health.
  7. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for one (Resident #19) of seven residents reviewed for Care Plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 was care planned for Hospice Care. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services.
  8. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #148) of five residents were provided medications and/or biologicals and pharmaceutical services to meet their needs. The facility failed to ensure LVN C did not leave Resident #148's medications inside the resident's room. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered by the physician.
August 23, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations

Fire safety inspections

19 fire safety citations on file: 11 on January 22, 2026, 7 on October 3, 2024, 1 on August 23, 2023.

Every fire safety citation19 citations
  1. F
    Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
    E 6 · January 22, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Include a process for Emergency Preparedness collaboration.
    E 9 · January 22, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Establish roles under a Waiver declared by secretary.
    E 26 · January 22, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Establish staff and initial training requirements.
    E 37 · January 22, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · January 22, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
    K 343 · January 22, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · January 22, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · January 22, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · January 22, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · January 22, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · January 22, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. F
    Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
    E 6 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. F
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. E
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. E
    Ensure electrical receptacles or cover plates have distinctive color or marking.
    K 917 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  18. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · October 3, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  19. D
    Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.
    K 916 · August 23, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
March 27, 2026Fine $8,278

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.293.393.86
Registered nurses0.760.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.012.983.42
Nurse aides2.16
Licensed practical nurses1.37
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)not reported55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported54.6%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 3.59 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.40 on weekdays and 4.01 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.78 in April to June 2025 to 4.29 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.290.764.404.01 7.7%0 of 9060
Oct to Dec 20253.880.804.023.53 3.4%0 of 9261
Apr to Jun 20253.780.813.993.29 2.6%0 of 9164
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For The Plaza at Edgemere. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.815.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.70.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.00.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.03.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.11.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.73.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.79.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
25.425.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
8.312.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.72.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.62.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for The Plaza at Edgemere's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (65.4% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

65.4% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 370 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.9% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 375 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

5.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 232 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

53.8% this home

Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 184 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.9% this home

Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 320 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.2% this home

Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 320 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 144 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BAY 9 HOLDINGS LLC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Grenelle Holdings LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%06/13/2023
Lapis Municipal Opportunities IV LP5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization100%06/13/2023
Chavez, FrankCorporate officerIndividual06/13/2023
Hatch, KjerstinCorporate officerIndividual06/13/2023
Terrell, BasiaCorporate officerIndividual06/13/2023
Certus Edgemere Management LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization08/01/2024
Chavez, FrankOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/13/2023
Hatch, KjerstinOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/13/2023
Odorizzi, SandraOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/13/2025
Terrell, BasiaOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/13/2023
Lapis- Gp LLCGeneral partnership interestOrganization06/13/2023
Odorizzi, SandraAdp of the SNFIndividual10/13/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 2, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 27, 2026: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 22, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  4. Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 22, 2026: "Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data."

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is The Plaza at Edgemere's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates The Plaza at Edgemere 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did The Plaza at Edgemere get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 22, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has The Plaza at Edgemere been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,278 in the last three years.
Does The Plaza at Edgemere accept Medicaid?
CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
Who owns The Plaza at Edgemere?
CMS lists 12 owners and managers. Legal business name: BAY 9 HOLDINGS LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection