Find a nursing home

Home / Texas / Royse City

Royse City Medical Lodge

901 W Interstate 30, Royse City, TX 75189 · Rockwall County · (972) 636-9100

124 certified beds, about 92 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2009

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676217 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 12, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 17 health citations since September 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.24 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.33 of those hours.

44.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).

CMS links it to Priority Management, an affiliated group of 38 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
7E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
February 12, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen in that:The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility walk-in refrigerator were dated and labeled on 2/10/2026. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness if consumed and food contamination.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility to all the residents the right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive. 2 (Resident #2 and Resident#59) of 8 residents reviewed advanced directives. 1- The facility failed to obtain a physician order for a DNR in a timely manner after Resident #2 signed a DNR on [DATE]. 2- The facility failed to obtain a physician order for a DNR in a timely manner after Resident#59 signed a DNR on [DATE]. The care plan did not reflect the correct code status. These failures could place residents at risk of not having a physician order followed and could affect the rights of residents that elected a DNR and could result in the facility not honoring the resident's wishes. [...]
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #61) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to accurately complete Resident #61's Quarterly MDS Assessment on 12/12/25 related to prescribed opioid medication use. This failure could place the resident at risk of not appropriately monitoring her medicationsFindings included: Record review of Resident #61's face sheet dated 2/12/26 reflected an [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date of 12/10/11 and readmission date of 12/22/22. [...]
  4. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistive devices, which enabled residents to transfer independently, for one (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for assistive devices. The facility failed to obtain physician's order prior to installing Resident #7's Trapeze bar used for mobility and transfers (trapeze bar is an overhead assistive device designed for residents, with limited mobility to safely lift, reposition, or transfer themselves in and out of bed)This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for not having their physician orders followed and decline in resident's mobility.
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 1 (Resident #4) of 6 residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure LVN D and CNA F wore appropriate PPE when transferring Resident #4 on EBP isolation from shower chair to bed on 02/10/26. This failure could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination of pathogens and illness. [...]
October 17, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
  1. E
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 5 (Resident#34, Resident #36, Resident #39, Resident#55, and Resident #76) of 8 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident#34, Resident #36's, Resident #39's, Resident#55, and Resident #76's nails were cleaned and trimmed. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store and label food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen in that: The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility refrigerator and freezer were covered, dated, or labeled. These failures could affect residents who received their meals from the facility's only kitchen, by placing them at risk for food-borne illness if consumed and food contamination. Findings Include: Observation in facility's kitchen walk-in refrigerator on 10/15/24 at 9:35am revealed 2 medium circular foiled covered items (about 9 inches) without a label or date used by. Observation in facility's kitchen walk-in refrigerator on 10/15/24 9:36am revealed 1 white and red square container labeled chicken with lid opened to about ¼ inch on one corner of the container. [...]
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 3 residents (Resident #5, Resident#69, and Resident #199) of 8 residents observed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure: 1- CNA A performed hand hygiene between change of gloves during incontinent care for Resident #5. 2- CNA H donned the appropriate PPE during Resident #69 interaction who was on droplet precautions. CNA H performed hand hygiene between Resident #69 and another resident's room. 3- CNA L and CNA O donned the appropriate PPE during incontinent care for Resident #199 who was on enhanced barriers precautions. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and cross contamination of pathogens and illness.
  4. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents receive adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #11) of two residents observed during a transfer. The Facility failed to ensure CNA C used a gait belt when transferring Resident #11 from her bed to the wheelchair. This failure could affect the residents by placing the residents at risk for falls, discomfort, pain, and/or injury.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one (Resident #11) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility failed to ensure CNA C kept Resident #11's urine catheter bag below the level of the bladder during a transfer from bed to wheelchair. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections.
  6. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #77) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Oxygen (O2) in use signage was on Resident #77's room doorway. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate respiratory care.
  7. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #3) of 4 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure RN B followed physician ordered water flushes before and after medication administration given via the G-Tube for Resident #3. This failure could place residents at risk of tube obstruction and a decrease in hydration.
September 17, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #1, Resident #2) of 6 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure: 1- Resident #1 had his fingernails trimmed and cleaned. 2- Resident #2 had his fingernails trimmed and cleaned. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, injuries to self or other residents, and a decreased quality of life.
September 8, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment in one facility (carpet throughout facility and Rooms 303, 305, 307, 309, 311, 315, and 317) of one observed for a clean and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure that the facility carpet and resident rooms were cleaned daily, and in accordance with the facility's Housekeeping Checklist. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of infections and living in an uncomfortable environment leading to a decreased quality of life.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure foods in the facility's dry storage area, refrigerator, and freezer were stored and dated according to guidelines. The facility failed to ensure proper discarding of expired and damaged food stored in the refrigerator and dry storage area. The facility failed to ensure the Ice Scooper Holder, located in the facility's only kitchen, was clean and sanitary. The facility failed to ensure the Iced Tea dispenser, prepared for residents, was covered, and sealed from air-borne diseases once prepared. The facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was clean and sanitary. [...]
  3. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for one (Resident #53) of five residents reviewed reasonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure the call light system in Resident #53's room was in a position that was accessible to the resident. This failure could place residents who require reasonable accommodations at risk of being unable to obtain assistance and decreased dignity.
  4. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan meet professional standards of quality for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's oxygen concentrator filter was clean. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving safe and sufficient respiratory care.

Fire safety inspections

4 fire safety citations on file: 1 on February 12, 2026, 2 on October 17, 2024, 1 on September 8, 2023.

Every fire safety citation4 citations
  1. E
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · February 12, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Meet Health Care Facilities Code mechanical requirements.
    K 900 · October 17, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · October 17, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. C
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · September 8, 2023 · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTexasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.243.393.86
Registered nurses0.330.430.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.822.983.42
Nurse aides1.97
Licensed practical nurses0.94
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)44.9%55.3%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover57.1%54.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.78 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.41 on weekdays and 2.82 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.20 in April to June 2025 to 3.24 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.240.333.412.82 2.7%0 of 9092
Oct to Dec 20253.290.353.412.98 1.2%0 of 9285
Jul to Sep 20253.230.373.362.89 0.9%0 of 9293
Apr to Jun 20253.200.383.352.84 1.3%0 of 9193
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Texas, Jan to Mar 20263.330.403.502.932.2%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Texas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Texas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.03$16.97 to $20.7188,680
LPNs and LVNs$29.92$27.46 to $32.8957,560
Registered nurses$46.14$38.06 to $50.53271,380
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTexasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.815.813.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.30.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.30.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.13.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
14.414.014.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.53.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.39.615.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
19.625.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
16.212.312.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.02.21.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.42.11.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: HUNT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Priority Management, a group of 38 nursing homes averaging 2.9 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Hunt Memorial Hospital District5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%06/01/2025
Caretrust Reit Inc5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization06/01/2025
Ctr Partnership LP5% or greater mortgage interestOrganization06/01/2025
Boles, StevenCorporate officerIndividual06/01/2025
Pmg Opco-Royse City LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization06/01/2025
Bauder, WilliamOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2025
Boulware, DouglasIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual05/19/2025
Boulware, StevenIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual05/19/2025
Bridgepointe Finanical Services, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization06/01/2025
Caretrust Reit IncAdp of the SNFOrganization06/01/2025
Ctr Partnership LPAdp of the SNFOrganization06/01/2025
Innovative Nurse Consulting, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization06/01/2025
Pmg Opco-Royse City LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization05/19/2025
Priority Management Group, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization06/01/2025
Progressive Rehab Solutions, LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization06/01/2025
Arze, StevenAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2024
Prado, DannyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on February 12, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 12, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 12, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 12, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.82 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.

Other nursing homes nearby

Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Royse City Medical Lodge's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Royse City Medical Lodge 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Royse City Medical Lodge get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 12, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
Has Royse City Medical Lodge been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Royse City Medical Lodge accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Royse City Medical Lodge?
CMS lists 17 owners and managers, and links the home to Priority Management. Legal business name: HUNT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection