205 Beech St., Farmersville, TX 75442 · Collin County · (972) 784-6191
74 certified beds, about 65 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2017
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676424 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 17, 2026, inspectors cited 10 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 22 health citations since October 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.88 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.59 of those hours.
47.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Foursquare Healthcare, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to personal privacy during medical treatment and personal care and confidentiality of personal and medical records for four of twenty residents (Resident #1, #36, #69, and Resident #75) reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. The facility failed to ensure LVN E pulled the privacy curtain while connecting Resident #1's formula to his g-tube on 03/15/2026. The facility failed to ensure CNA J provided privacy while transferring Resident #36 on 03/16/2026. The facility failed to ensure LVN E closed, locked, or minimized her laptop monitor before leaving her cart, thus exposing Resident #69's medical information, on 03/15/2026. The facility failed to ensure RN D did not disclose Resident #75's treatment to her roommate and the roommate's family member on 03/16/2026. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for five of eighteen residents (Residents #4, #17, #38, #51, and #67) reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure an antifungal powder was not inside Resident #4's room and his medication was not left with him to take unattended on 03/15/2026.2. The facility failed to secure Resident #4's TUMS when it was left inside his room on 03/15/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure an eyedrop was not inside Resident #17's room on 03/15/2026. 4. The facility failed to ensure an antifungal powder and a wound cleanser were not inside Resident #38's room on 03/15/2026. 5. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's one of one kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff properly labeled and dated stored food received by vendors. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was thoroughly cleaned and/or sanitized. The facility failed to ensure the serving table had the appropriate amount of sanitizer in the container (red bucket) for sanitization. The facility failed to ensure the deep fryer was properly cleaned. The facility failed to ensure expired food in the refrigerator was discarded. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to food contamination and illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for a resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for care plan. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's care plan reflected a plan of care for the resident's use of a Nebulizer. This failure could place the resident at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one of two residents (Resident #2) reviewed for feeding tube management. The facility failed to ensure LVN E flushed Resident #2's g-tube before administering the resident's bolus feeding on 03/15/2026. This failure could place residents with g-tubes at risk for tube displacement, clogging, aspiration, and discomfort.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for one of six residents (Resident #20) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's Nebulizer mask was properly stored in a bag when not in use on 03/15/26. This failure could place the resident at risk for respiratory infection and not having their respiratory needs met.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for one of eighteen residents (Resident #4) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's medication was not left with the resident to take unattended on 03/15/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medications as ordered, taking medications without a self-administration assessment, potential overdose, and adverse effect.
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two of eighteen resident (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN E performed hand hygiene and changed her gloves while preparing Resident #1's formula for g-tube on 03/15/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN E sanitized the tray she used between Resident #1 and Resident #2 during g-tube management on 03/15/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for one of three direct care staff (RN D) reviewed for other environmental conditions. The facility failed to ensure that RN D did not leave a container of germicidal wipes on top of the nurse's cart unattended on 03/16/2026. This failure could prevent the residents from having an environment that was safe for the residents, staff, and public.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 34 (Room numbers 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 and 39) out of 34 multiple-resident bedrooms, measured at least 80 square feet per resident. The facility failed to ensure multiple resident Room numbers 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 18, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37 and 39 met the required minimum of 80 square feet per resident. The facility failed to ensure all resident rooms had the required minimum of 80 square feet per resident in rooms occupied by multiple residents. This failure could place residents who reside in these rooms at-risk for a limitation in their ability to move around the room and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for one of one resident (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from abuse when CNA A spoke to the resident in a rude, demeaning, and inappropriate manner, including making unnecessary and offensive comments. This failure could place residents at risk for emotional distress, verbal abuse, and violation of their rights. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet on 01/16/26, stated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnoses: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, who needed respiratory care, were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 4 of twelve residents (Resident #20, Resident #27, Resident #36, and Resident #57) reviewed for Respiratory Care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's nasal cannula (flexible tube used to deliver oxygen to the nose through two prongs) on her wheelchair was properly stored when not in use on 01/05/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's nasal cannula at the back of the wheelchair was properly stored when not in use on 01/05/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36's nasal cannula at the back of the wheelchair was properly stored when not in use on 01/05/2025. 4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #34) of eight residents reviewed for Infection Control. The facility failed to ensure CNA B changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene while providing incontinent care to Resident #34 on 01/05/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 34 (Room numbers 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 and 39) out of 34 multiple-resident bedrooms, measured at least 80 square feet per resident. The facility failed to ensure multiple resident Room numbers 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 and 39 met the required minimum of 80 square feet per resident. This failure could place residents at risk of not having sufficient space.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for areas in the facility for 8 of 20 rooms (Room # 2, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20) observed for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure that resident rooms were cleaned and serviced in accordance with the facility's policy on Housekeeping Services. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of infections and living in an uncomfortable environment leading to a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was clean and sanitary. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and other illnesses.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #64) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to notify the facility physician/FNP following an allegation of abuse reported for Resident #64 on 09/22/23. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their allegations of abuse reported to the physician/FNP.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property and that establish policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #64) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility did not follow their policy for Abuse and Neglect and thoroughly investigate when Resident #64 had an allegation of sexual abuse reported on 09/22/23. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their allegations of abuse and neglect investigated.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations of abuse and neglect were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #64) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility did not thoroughly investigate when Resident #64 had an allegation of sexual abuse reported on 09/22/23. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their allegations of abuse and neglect investigated.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for one (Resident #36) of three resident assessments reviewed for PASRR evaluations. 1. The facility did not complete a new PASRR Level 1 Screening for Resident #36 when he was diagnosed with PTSD on 06/21/23. These failures could affect residents with psychiatric diagnoses who may not be evaluated and receive needed PASRR services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #119) of three residents observed for infection control. CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene while providing incontinence care to Resident #119. This failure could place residents at risk for spread of infection through cross-contamination.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 34 (Room number's 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 and 39) out of 34 multiple-resident bedrooms, measured at least 80 square feet per resident. The facility failed to ensure multiple resident Room number's 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 and 39 met the required minimum of 80 square feet per resident. This failure could place residents at risk of not having sufficient space.
8 fire safety citations on file: 4 on March 17, 2026, 2 on January 7, 2025, 2 on October 19, 2023.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.88 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.59 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.55 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.69 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.60 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 47.1% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 16.7% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.40 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.01 on weekdays and 2.55 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.64 in April to June 2025 to 2.88 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.88 | 0.59 | 3.01 | 2.55 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 65 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.60 | 0.54 | 2.72 | 2.28 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 69 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.68 | 0.53 | 2.82 | 2.30 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 67 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.64 | 0.49 | 2.80 | 2.24 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 68 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.0 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.3 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 19.1 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.9 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Farmersville Health and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 10 eligible stays.
11.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 25 eligible stays.
6.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 35 eligible stays.
47.2% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 36 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 60 residents counted.
1.2% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 60 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 4 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: NOCONA HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Foursquare Healthcare, a group of 10 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nocona Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2017 |
| Collin Nh Realty Ltd | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Dwm 5x5 Trust | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Fairbrook Partners, LP | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 01/01/2024 | |
| Jec 5x5 Trust | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Jem 5x5 Trust | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Kjc 5x5 Trust | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Montague Nh, LP | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Rmm 5x5 Trust | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Rockett, LP | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Sdl Gs 5x5 Trust | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Miller, Don | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Individual | 04/01/2017 | |
| Meekins, Greg | Corporate director | Individual | 04/01/2017 | |
| Foursquare Texas 16 LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Box, Jacey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2017 | |
| Lewis, Shane | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2017 | |
| Miller, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2017 | |
| Miller, John | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2017 | |
| Miller, Richard | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2017 | |
| Campbell, John | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/23/2025 | |
| Campbell, Kenneth | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/23/2025 | |
| Collin Nh Realty Ltd | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Dwm 5x5 Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Fairbrook Partners, LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Foursquare Texas 16 LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/23/2025 | |
| Jec 5x5 Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Jem 5x5 Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Kjc 5x5 Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Montague Nh, LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Rmm 5x5 Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Rockett, LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Sdl Gs 5x5 Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Barsik, Tamara | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2017 | |
| Box, Jacey | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.