Find a nursing home

Home / Tennessee / Sevierville

Sevierville Health and Rehabilitation Center

415 Catlett Rd, Sevierville, TN 37862 · Sevier County · (865) 453-4747

98 certified beds, about 81 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1980

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 445132 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 4, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Tennessee average is 4.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 11 health citations since January 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.71 hours per resident per day, against 3.80 across Tennessee and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.59 of those hours.

42.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Tennessee average 48.9%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 11 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
9D
0E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
March 4, 2026Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy reviews, medical record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection practices to prevent the potential spread of infection for 8 residents (Residents #57, #54, #81, #9, #71, #30, #59, and #72) of 85 residents observed for infection control.
November 8, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and stored properly in 1 of 2 freezers in the kitchen and failed to ensure a clean and sanitary milk cooler which had the potential to affect all 80 residents in the facility.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 6, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical information was not visible for 1 resident (Resident #325) of 80 observed.
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 26, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 resident (Resident #60) of 18 residents reviewed for MDS assessments.
  4. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 13, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to resubmit a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) after a new mental health diagnosis for 1 resident (Resident #61) of 7 residents reviewed for PASARR.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 8, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for 1 resident (Resident #326) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.
  6. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for 1 resident (Resident #21) of 24 residents reviewed for medical records.
January 16, 2020Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 20, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of needs for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #33) reviewed for call light accessibility. This failure had the potential to prevent Resident #33 from calling for assistance as desired and potentially prevent Resident #33's needs from being met.
  2. D
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 13, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, review of facility admission packet, medical record review, and interviews, the facility failed to issue bed hold notices within 24 hours after transfer to the hospital for 2 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #27 and Resident #1).
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 15, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, interviews, and review of the Hospice Cooperative Agreement, the facility failed to implement a Bowel Movement (BM) protocol and failed to ensure effective coordination of hospice care for one resident (Resident #11) out of 15 sampled residents. These failures placed Resident #11 at risk for complications related to constipation and potential fecal impaction (a large mass of dry, hard stool that can develop in the rectum due to chronic constipation).
  4. C
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 20, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide 2 of 3 residents (Resident #20 and Resident #33) with the Advanced Beneficiary Notice, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-10055 when they ended therapy services and remained in the facility for long-term care services. This failure left residents without information related to the cost of therapy services if they desired to continue them in the facility and did not allow for them to have informed choice.

Fire safety inspections

4 fire safety citations on file: 1 on March 4, 2026, 2 on November 8, 2023, 1 on January 16, 2020.

Every fire safety citation4 citations
  1. D
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · March 4, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · November 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Provide a written emergency evacuation plan.
    K 711 · November 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · January 16, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeTennesseeUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.713.803.86
Registered nurses0.590.600.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.293.313.42
Nurse aides2.10
Licensed practical nurses1.02
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)42.4%48.9%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover40.0%43.2%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.87 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.88 on weekdays and 3.29 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 21.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.57 in April to June 2025 to 3.71 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.710.593.883.29 21.2%0 of 9081
Oct to Dec 20253.730.693.923.23 17.5%0 of 9275
Jul to Sep 20253.700.693.903.19 0.0%0 of 9276
Apr to Jun 20253.570.553.683.29 17.4%0 of 9176
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Tennessee, Jan to Mar 20263.750.563.953.274.0%0.7% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeTennesseeUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.314.013.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.30.70.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.31.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.83.43.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.41.71.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
11.517.214.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.05.04.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.716.915.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
20.822.623.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
17.011.212.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.21.71.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.91.61.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Ownership data not available

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 8, 2023: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on November 8, 2023: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 8, 2023: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on March 4, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.29 hours per resident per day, below the Tennessee average of 3.31.

Other nursing homes nearby

Tennessee contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Tennessee. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Sevierville Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Sevierville Health and Rehabilitation Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Sevierville Health and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on March 4, 2026. The Tennessee average is 4.4.
Has Sevierville Health and Rehabilitation Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Sevierville Health and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Sevierville Health and Rehabilitation Center?
CMS lists 1 owner or manager. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection