St. Francis Nursing Home
630 W Woodlawn Ave, San Antonio, TX 78212 · Bexar County · (210) 736-3177
107 certified beds, about 91 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicaid since 1997
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 45F410 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 23, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 16 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.34 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.20 of those hours.
22.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.
January 23, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 resident hall (Hall 200) of 4 resident halls reviewed, in that:Potentially harmful cleaning materials were unsecured in resident Hall 200. This deficient practice could result in an unsafe environment for residents, staff, and the public.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to formulate an advance directive for one (Resident 40) of twenty-five residents reviewed, in that:Resident #40's OOH-DNR was not fully signed by Witness #1 and was therefore invalid. This deficient practice could result in residents' end of life wishes being unknown or dishonored.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #14, and #78) reviewed for infection control, in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A sanitize her hands while providing incontinent care for Resident #14 2. The facility failed to ensure Medication Aide B did not touch medications without wearing gloves while administering medications to Resident #78. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices.
- C Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for two of three refuse containers (Dumpster #1 and Dumpster #2 used for recyclable refuse) on the loading dock. The facility failed to ensure the doors to Dumpster #1 and Dumpster #2 were closed. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for illness from exposure to germs and diseases carried by vermin and rodents.
April 24, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- J Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, that resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure appropriate and timely care when Resident #1 had a fall on 4/16/2025 and was diagnosis with a fractured C1 vertebrae, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, scalp laceration requiring repair and hematoma/contusion. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN B did not move Resident #1 with a mechanical lift after a fall on 04/16/2025. 3. [...]
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1), reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to supervise Resident #1 when she was left unattended during care while CNA A retrieved supplies and resulted in a fall with a head injury, scalp laceration, hematoma/contusion to the forehead/scalp, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage and fracture to the C-1 vertebrae of her neck. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified as past non-compliance on 04/23/25. The noncompliance began on 4/16/2025 and ended on 4/22/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents, and could result in serious injury, harm, impairment, and death.
October 18, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. The facility failed to store, label and date food items properly in the walk-in cooler, freezer, and dry storage room. 2. The facility failed to store a dented can in a separate location in the dry storage room. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness.
- E Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a policy regarding the use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling and consumption of residents' food items for 4 of 5 resident refrigerators (refrigerators in resident Rooms 115, 208, 213, and 215) reviewed for personal food policy, in that: 1. The personal refrigerators in three residents' Rooms (115, 208, and 215) contained food items which were unlabeled and undated. 2. The internal temperature of the refrigerator on resident room [ROOM NUMBER] exceeded 41 degrees Fahrenheit. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of foodborne illness due to consuming foods which were spoiled.
- E Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for effective pest control, in that: The facility failed to ensure the facility was free from live rodents. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of remaining in an environment that was not free of pests and rodents.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on Observation, Interview, and Record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 2 of 5 (Residents #3 and #49) reviewed for resident rights, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's and Resident #49's call light was within reach. This failure could place residents at risk of not achieving independent functioning, dignity, and well-being.
- D Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for privacy, in that: The facility failed to ensure MA D locked the computer, which exposed Resident #3's morning medication list after she walked away and left the computer unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having medical information exposed to others and cause residents to feel uncomfortable and disrespected.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #6 and #23) reviewed for respiratory care in that: The facility failed to ensure Residents #6 and #23's, oxygen tubing was dated. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for an increase in respiratory complications.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days , except if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believed that it was appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's medical record, and indicate the duration for the PRN order for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for pharmacy services, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #41 had a stop date for PRN Xanax 0.25 mg (a medicine used to treat the symptoms of anxiety). This failure could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #6) reviewed for infection control, in that: The facility failed to ensure LVN C changed her gloves when moving from a dirty to clean task and failed to use appropriate hand hygiene between glove changes when she provided wound care to Resident #6. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for infection .
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to post information on a daily basis regarding the total number of the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift for registered nurses, licensed practical nurses or licensed vocational nurses, certified nurses aides and resident census for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for posting. The facility failed to include the actual hours worked for the nursing staff on the nursing daily staff posting This deficient practice could place residents at risk or missed or inadequate care.
September 8, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder or related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 of 1 Resident (Resident #2) reviewed for PASARR eligibility, in that: The facility failed to refer Resident #2 for a PASARR level II evaluation after being diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Bipolar Disorder. This deficient practice could affect residents with new mental illness diagnoses and it could result in residents not receiving services as needed.
Fire safety inspections
6 fire safety citations on file: 1 on January 23, 2026, 3 on October 18, 2024, 2 on September 8, 2023.
Every fire safety citation6 citations
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
- E Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.34 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.20 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.20 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.24 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.90 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 22.9% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.38 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.39 on weekdays and 3.20 on weekends, 6% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.45 in April to June 2025 to 3.34 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.34 | 0.20 | 3.39 | 3.20 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 91 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.43 | 0.21 | 3.51 | 3.21 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 91 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.53 | 0.25 | 3.64 | 3.25 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 89 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.45 | 0.31 | 3.56 | 3.16 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 92 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Texas
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.1 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.8 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.1 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.9 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 23, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 23, 2026: "Dispose of garbage and refuse properly."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- Can we see a resident room, a shower room and the dining room on this visit?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 23, 2026: "Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Meridian Care Monte Vista San Antonio, 0.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 49 citations
- San Pedro Manor San Antonio, 0.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- San Antonio North Nursing and Rehabilitation San Antonio, 0.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 56 citations
- Memorial Medical Nursing and Rehabilitation San Antonio, 0.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 57 citations
- The Sarah Roberts French Home San Antonio, 1.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- The Village at Incarnate Word San Antonio, 2.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- River City Care Center San Antonio, 2.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Golden Estates Rehabilitation Center San Antonio, 3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 32 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is St. Francis Nursing Home's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates St. Francis Nursing Home 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did St. Francis Nursing Home get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 23, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has St. Francis Nursing Home been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does St. Francis Nursing Home accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns St. Francis Nursing Home?
- CMS lists 1 owner or manager. Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.