Find a nursing home

Home / Utah / Richfield

Stonehenge of Richfield

125 East 600 North, Richfield, UT 84701 · Sevier County · (435) 896-2000

30 certified beds, about 28 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2010

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 465173 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 29, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Utah average is 8.8, the national average 9.2).

Of 21 health citations since September 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.07 hours per resident per day, against 4.09 across Utah and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.34 of those hours.

36.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Utah average 50.7%).

CMS links it to Stonehenge of Utah, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
12D
7E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 29, 2025Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. E
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, for 3 of 15 sampled residents, the facility did not ensure that residents who used psychotropic drugs received a gradual dose reduction, and behavioral interventions unless clinically contraindicated in an effort to discontinue the drugs; additionally the facility did not ensure PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days unless clinically contraindicated. Specifically, there was no rationale after 90 days for continued use of a prn anti-anxiety medication, another resident did not have a rationale for continuation of an anti-depressant and anti-anxiety and another resident did not have a gradual dose reduction that was ordered by the physician implemented. Resident identifiers: 2, 7 and 11.
  2. E
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    F801 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 18, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, the facility did not employ a full time Director of Food and Nutrition Services with the required qualifications of Certified Dietary Manager, Certified Food Service Manager or with a degree in food service management or 2 or more years of experience as a director of food and nutrition services. Specifically, the facility's Certified Dietary Manager was employed part time and the full-time Dietary Manager was not yet certified to work as a Dietary Manager.
  3. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, food items in the walk-in freezer, walk-in refrigerator and dry food storage room were open to the air. Additionally, food items in the food storage room were past their use by dates.
  4. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. Specifically, during medication pass a staff member was observed to place her bare fingers inside the medication cups prior to administering medications to residents. Additionally, during hallway meal pass, drinks, cold cereal and soup were observed to be transported uncovered to residents. Resident identifiers: 10, 11 and 12.
  5. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that for 1 out of 15 sampled residents the facility did not send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman. Resident identifier:
  6. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined for 2 of 15 sampled residents, the resident assessment did not accurately reflect the resident's status. Specifically, two residents who were using oxygen had assessments stating they were not using oxygen at the facility. Resident identifiers: 2 and 10.
  7. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, for 1 out of 15 sampled residents, the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's nursing needs. Specifically, a care plan was not developed to address the resident's oral hygiene care. Resident identifier: 11.
  8. D
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    F676 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, for 1 of 15 sampled residents, the facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his ability to carry out the activities of daily living (ADL). Specifically, a resident was observed to have buildup on his teeth and there was no documentation that he was provided oral care routinely. Resident identifier: 11.
July 12, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations
September 2, 2021Standard inspection · 13 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 17 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible. Specifically, a resident that required two staff members assistance sustained a fall resulting in 6 sutures to her face when one staff member was assisting her.
  2. F
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    F801 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility did not employ a clinically qualified full-time dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services. Specifically, the facility did not employ a full-time Registered Dietitian (RD) and the Dietary Manager (DM) did not meet the requirements to serve as the Director of Food and Nutrition Services.
  3. E
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    F711 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined, for 6 out of 17 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the physician reviewed each residents total program of care, including medications and treatments at each visit; write, sign and date progress notes at each visit; and sign and date all orders with the exception of influenza and pneumococcal vaccine. Specifically, residents Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms, care plans, death reports and physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) evaluation and treatment plans were not signed by the medical director (MD). Resident identifiers: 2, 6, 7, 12, 14, and 64.
  4. E
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined, for 4 out of 17 sampled residents, that the facility did not maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible and systematically organized. Specifically, resident's medical records did not contain the physician notes, assessments, and orders. Resident identifiers: 2, 4, 7, and 12.
  5. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, including COVID-19. Specifically, observations were made of staff entering a quarantine room on droplet isolation precautions without donning a N95 mask, staff were observed inside the facility and resident areas without eye protection, and staff were observed wearing their surgical masks down below their nose and mouth. Resident identifier: 2 and 65.
  6. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined, for 1 out of 17 residents, that the facility did not ensure that the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) had determined that the resident was safe to self administer medications. Specifically, a resident was not evaluated to determine if they were safe to self administer two inhaler medications. Resident identifier 65.
  7. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 17 sampled residents, that the facility did not immediately consult with the resident's physician and notify when there was a significant change in the resident's status or a need to alter treatment. Specifically, a resident had a fecal impaction that required digital evacuation of the bowel and a resident had increasing complaints of pain after a fall and the physician was not immediately notified. Resident identifier 4 and 12.
  8. D
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 17 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) data was transmitted within 14 days after the resident's assessment was completed. Specifically, a resident was discharged from the facility and the MDS data was not transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services System for greater than 120 days. Resident identifier 1.
  9. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 2 of 17 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Specifically, a resident went 5 days without a bowel movement with no interventions and a resident suffered a fall and did not get x-rays for 5 days. Resident identifiers: 4 and 12.
  10. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 17 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers (PU) received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. Specifically, a resident with a Stage II PU was provided wound care treatment without a documented evaluation and order to treat the wound by the wound care specialist. Additionally, the order entered in the medical records for wound care did not specify the type of treatment to be applied to the wound. Resident identifier 2.
  11. D
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    F710 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 17 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that another physician supervised the medical care of residents when their attending physician was unavailable. Specifically, the attending physician did not respond to a resident's change in condition for two days. Resident identifier 4.
  12. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 17 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that psychotropic drugs were not given unless necessary to treat a specific condition diagnosed and documented in the clinical record and residents who used the psychotropic drugs received a gradual dose reduction and behavioral interventions unless clinically contraindicated. Specifically, a resident was prescribed a psychotropic for insomnia without a diagnosed and documented condition, and a resident was prescribed a psychotropic and did not receive a gradual dose reduction. Resident identifiers: 4 and 64.
  13. D
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    F886 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 22, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 out of 5 sampled facility staff, that the facility did not ensure that testing of all facility staff for COVID-19 was completed based on the parameters set forth by the Secretary. Specifically, routine testing of an unvaccinated staff member based on the county positivity rate was not completed for one week out of the four weeks reviewed. Staff identifier: Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 5.

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeUtahUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.074.093.86
Registered nurses1.341.250.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.663.583.42
Nurse aides1.63
Licensed practical nurses0.10
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)36.0%50.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover0.0%40.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.97 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.24 on weekdays and 2.66 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.84 in April to June 2025 to 3.07 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.071.343.242.66 0.0%0 of 9028
Oct to Dec 20253.961.764.183.42 0.0%0 of 9221
Jul to Sep 20254.722.065.033.93 0.0%0 of 9219
Apr to Jun 20254.842.065.114.16 0.0%0 of 9117
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Utah, Jan to Mar 20263.911.114.103.442.8%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeUtahUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
14.611.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.70.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.41.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.03.94.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
22.214.215.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
9.216.623.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
15.911.612.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: KANE COUNTY HUMAN RESOURCE SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Stonehenge of Utah, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Archstone Healthcare LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%11/01/2025
Cichos, TysonDirect ownership interestIndividual12/11/2017
Cloward, WyattDirect ownership interestIndividual12/11/2017
Robison, CoryDirect ownership interestIndividual10/25/2021
Robison, Cory5% or greater indirect ownership interestIndividual47%10/25/2021
Kane County Human Resource Special Service DistrictIndirect ownership interestOrganization10/25/2021
Gillespie, DeborahIndirect ownership interestIndividual10/25/2021
Howells, StephenIndirect ownership interestIndividual10/25/2021
Juluson, TylerIndirect ownership interestIndividual10/25/2021
Loveless, KurtIndirect ownership interestIndividual10/25/2021
Spencer, JesseIndirect ownership interestIndividual06/15/2010
Howells, StephenCorporate officerIndividual12/20/1992
Loveless, KurtCorporate officerIndividual10/25/2021
Archstone Healthcare LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization11/01/2025
Kane County Human Resource Special Service DistrictOperational/managerial controlOrganization12/11/2017
Cichos, TysonOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/11/2017
Cloward, WyattOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/11/2017
Gillespie, DeborahOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/25/2021
Howells, StephenOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/25/2021
Juluson, TylerOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/25/2021
Loveless, KurtOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/25/2021
Robison, CoryOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/25/2021
Spencer, JesseOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/15/2010
Archstone Healthcare LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization12/24/2025
Kane County Human Resource Special Service DistrictAdp of the SNFOrganization02/26/2025
Cichos, TysonAdp of the SNFIndividual12/11/2017
Cloward, WyattAdp of the SNFIndividual12/11/2017
Gillespie, DeborahAdp of the SNFIndividual10/25/2021
Howells, StephenAdp of the SNFIndividual10/25/2021
Juluson, TylerAdp of the SNFIndividual10/25/2021
Loveless, KurtAdp of the SNFIndividual10/25/2021
Robison, CoryAdp of the SNFIndividual10/25/2002
Spencer, JesseAdp of the SNFIndividual06/15/2010

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 29, 2025: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 29, 2025: "Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason."
  3. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 29, 2025: "Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 29, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.66 hours per resident per day, below the Utah average of 3.58.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Utah contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Utah. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Stonehenge of Richfield's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Stonehenge of Richfield 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Stonehenge of Richfield get at its last inspection?
8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 29, 2025. The Utah average is 8.8.
Has Stonehenge of Richfield been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Stonehenge of Richfield accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Stonehenge of Richfield?
CMS lists 33 owners and managers, and links the home to Stonehenge of Utah. Legal business name: KANE COUNTY HUMAN RESOURCE SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection