Find a nursing home

Home / New Jersey / Elizabeth

Trinitas Hospital

655 East Jersey Street, Elizabeth, NJ 07206 · Union County · (908) 994-7525

124 certified beds, about 87 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998

Inside a hospital Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 315442 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 16, 2025, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the New Jersey average is 8.6, the national average 9.2).

None of its 10 health citations since June 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.87 hours per resident per day, against 3.85 across New Jersey and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.81 of those hours.

43.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (New Jersey average 39.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 10 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
6D
2E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
January 16, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    F577 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the most recent State of New Jersey inspection results in a place readily accessible to the residents, families, and the public. The deficient practice was identified on 3 of 3 units. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: During the Resident Council Meeting on 01/15/2025 at 10:00 AM, five of five alert and oriented residents said they were not aware of the location of the State Survey results and that the facility had not spoken to them about the results. During a tour of each unit, the surveyor had to ask at the nurse's station where the State survey results binder was kept. The surveyor was told by the unit secretary or nurse that was at the desk at each unit that it was located behind the nurse's station. [...]
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary environment for 2 of 3 units (South and North Units). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/12/2025 at 10:28 AM, Surveyor #1 observed the baseboard trim in room [ROOM NUMBER] detached from the wall on the North Unit. On 01/13/2025 at 10:35 AM, Surveyor #1 observed water stains on the ceiling tiles in the shower room on the North Nursing Unit. On 01/13/2025 at 10:43 AM, Surveyor #1 observed the shower room on the North Nursing Unit, which including a portable commode, three commode buckets, a commode lid, and a non-stick food placement mat placed on a chair in the corner. [...]
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices, such as hand hygiene and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing care and other high-contact care activities to 3 of 3 residents (Resident #23, #52, #84) reviewed under the Infection Control Task. The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/14/2025 at 10:24 AM, surveyor #1 observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN#1) perform tracheostomy (a small surgical opening that is made through the front of the neck into the windpipe) care, which was identified as requiring aseptic techniques (a set of practices that prevent the spread of infection) on Resident #52 and observed the following: [...]
  4. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide privacy for a resident during hygienic care. Specifically, the bedroom and bathroom doors were not closed, exposing the resident's upper body. This deficiency was noted for 1 out of 20 residents (Resident # 38) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/13/2025 at 10:19 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 38 in the bathroom sitting on the toilet, with the wheelchair positioned in front of the resident while getting dressed. The door was open, exposing the resident's upper body. During an interview with the surveyor on 01/13/2025 at 10:39 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse #1 (LPN #1) said that she was uncertain whether the bedroom and bathroom doors should remain open during the time the resident was getting dressed. [...]
  5. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to keep the call device system within reach for a resident who was dependent on staff. This deficiency was identified for 1 out of 1 resident (Resident # 32) reviewed for Accommodation of Needs. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/13/2025 at 10:01 AM, the surveyor reviewed the electronic medical records (EMR) for Resident #32. The EMR revealed that he/she had a diagnoses of but not limited to Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease (cognitive disease). A review of the significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care dated 11/20/2024 indicated that Resident #32 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent in both self-care and mobility. [...]
  6. D
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to complete and transmit a Minimum Data Set death in facility tracking record in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for resident assessment (Resident #58). This deficient practice was evidenced by: On [DATE] at 12:07 PM, the surveyor reviewed the facility assessment task that included the Resident's MDS Assessments. On [DATE] at 12:07 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #58's electronic medical record. The record revealed that the resident expired on [DATE]. The electronic health record reflected that there was no death in facility tracking record completed for the resident's death date of [DATE]. On [DATE] at 12:13 PM, the surveyor interviewed the MDS Coordinator. [...]
  7. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 10, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address an elopement alarm for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #59) reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 01/12/25 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #59 in the room with an elopement alarm on the left ankle. The surveyor reviewed Resident #59's medical record which reflected that the resident had diagnoses which included muscle weakness and anxiety. A review of the physician orders for Resident # 59 reflected an order dated 09/10/21 for the resident to have a wanderguard. The minimum data set, an assessment tool, dated 11/8/24 Q MDS reflected that Resident #59 used an elopement alarm used daily. [...]
September 1, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 14, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to transmit a Minimum Data Set (MDS) - Annual and Quarterly Reporting Assessment in accordance with federal guidelines. This deficient practice was identified for 13 of 13 residents reviewed for resident assessment (Resident #43, #44, #23, #5, #51, #53, #49, #20, #1, #26, #16, #65, #64). This deficient practice was evidenced by: On 8/25/23 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor reviewed the facility assessment task that included the Resident's MDS Assessments. A MDS is a comprehensive tool that is a federal mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents that must be completed and transmitted to the Quality Measure System. The facility must electronically transmit the MDS within 14 days of the assessment being completed. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 14, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care. This deficient practice was identified for one 1 of 18 residents, (Resident #3) reviewed for accurate coding of MDS. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 8/24/23 at 9:54 AM, Resident #3 was observed sitting on wheelchair in hallway, able to wheel self around unit. The Resident responded to the surveyor appropriately when spoken to stating that they were ok and had no issues with care. The Resident refused to continue the interview. The surveyor reviewed the resident's hybrid medical chart which included review of paper as well as computerized medical chart. [...]
June 30, 2021Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 20, 2021
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to a.) properly handle and store potentially hazardous foods in a manner that is intended to prevent the spread of food borne illnesses and b.) maintain equipment and kitchen areas in a manner to prevent microbial growth and cross contamination. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 6/23/21 at 09:49 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) and the Executive Chef (EC) and observed the following: 1. In the production area, there was one bag of kaiser rolls with no identification on the bag, no opened or use by dates. 2. In the prep fridge #16, there were five small individually wrapped styrofoam plates in clear plastic that contained tomato and lettuce dated use by 6/22/21. [...]

Fire safety inspections

5 fire safety citations on file: 1 on January 16, 2025, 1 on September 1, 2023, 3 on June 30, 2021.

Every fire safety citation5 citations
  1. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · January 16, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
    K 291 · September 1, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · June 30, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · June 30, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · June 30, 2021 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeNew JerseyUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.873.853.86
Registered nurses0.810.680.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.223.503.42
Nurse aides2.30
Licensed practical nurses0.76
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)43.8%39.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover21.4%37.7%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 3.25 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.13 on weekdays and 3.22 on weekends, 22% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 8.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.71 in April to June 2025 to 3.87 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.870.814.133.22 8.7%0 of 9087
Oct to Dec 20253.700.853.883.26 6.6%0 of 9287
Jul to Sep 20253.770.823.953.30 5.7%0 of 9290
Apr to Jun 20253.710.773.873.31 5.8%0 of 9188
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
New Jersey, Jan to Mar 20263.680.593.823.3411.6%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeNew JerseyUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.78.713.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.92.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.08.214.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.15.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.712.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
29.824.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
12.08.112.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.62.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.61.11.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: TRINITAS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Alam, AbuCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Balasia, JacquelynCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2022
Clifford, EileenCorporate directorIndividual06/14/2013
Horan, GaryCorporate directorIndividual06/14/2013
Kachelriess, ThomasCorporate directorIndividual06/14/2013
Khimani, KarimCorporate directorIndividual06/14/2013
Lopez, AlfonsoCorporate directorIndividual06/14/2013
Mackessy, RichardCorporate directorIndividual06/14/2013
Margolis, JanCorporate directorIndividual06/14/2013
McMenamin, MargaretCorporate directorIndividual06/14/2013
Pallant, RonaldCorporate directorIndividual06/14/2013
Patten, PaulCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Pelosi, AnthonyCorporate directorIndividual06/14/2013
Richel, VictorCorporate directorIndividual06/14/2013
Shaughnessy, MaureenCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2022
Spearman, RoderickCorporate directorIndividual06/14/2013
Diliegro, NancyCorporate officerIndividual04/15/2023
Gallinetti, DavidCorporate officerIndividual02/12/2024
Henwood, RichardCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2022
Rwj Barnabas Health IncOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2022
Diliegro, NancyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2025
Gallinetti, DavidOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2025
Diliegro, NancyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Gallinetti, DavidAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Khimani, KarimAdp of the SNFIndividual12/19/2025
Martin, EstredidaAdp of the SNFIndividual12/19/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 16, 2025: "Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 16, 2025: "Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on January 16, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on June 30, 2021: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.22 hours per resident per day, below the New Jersey average of 3.50.

Other nursing homes nearby

New Jersey contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in New Jersey. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Trinitas Hospital's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Trinitas Hospital 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Trinitas Hospital get at its last inspection?
7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 16, 2025. The New Jersey average is 8.6.
Has Trinitas Hospital been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Trinitas Hospital accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Trinitas Hospital?
CMS lists 26 owners and managers. Legal business name: TRINITAS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection