Truman Senior Living
400 North 4th Avenue East, Truman, MN 56088 · Martin County · (507) 776-2031
30 certified beds, about 24 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245346 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 2, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 13 health citations since February 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.77 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.90 of those hours.
45.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.
July 24, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an alleged violation involving neglect were reported to the State Agency within the required timeframe after becoming aware that staff failed to follow a resident's transfer care plan by transferring the resident without the required gait belt for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for falls.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure use of the correct sling was used according to manufacture instructions for a total body mechanical lift 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for safe transfers involving mechanical lifts. In addition the facility failed to complete a comprehensive fall investigation analysis to identify root cause/causal factors to prevent and/or reduce the risk of falls and/or falls with major injury for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for falls.
January 2, 2026Standard inspection · 3 citations
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's representative was notified of a new bruise for 1 of 1 resident (R5)who was reviewed for skin injury.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident medication status was accurately coded in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 1 resident (R21) reviewed for medications, specifically insulin.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a falls care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R5) was updated to include the current interventions.
November 14, 2024Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident medication status was accurately coded in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 2 residents (R17) reviewed for medications.
August 21, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that identified R1 had failed to use call light appropriately and/or refusals to use the call light for 1 of 1 (R1) resident reviewed for care plan.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to complete appropriate assessments and failed to reposition and document that repositioning for 1 of 1 resident (R1). Review of the report filed to the State Agency identified on 8/13/24 at 2:30 p.m., two nursing assistants placed R1 on a bedpan at approximately 12:30 p.m., and was found by staff remaining on the bed pan at approximately 4:15 p.m., when R1 call out to staff notifying them staff had forgotten to return and remove R1 off the bed pan. R1's, 7/07/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified R1 had severely cognitive impairment, little interest, or pleasure in doing things, and feeling down, depressed, or hopeless for never to 1 day. R1 was dependent on staff with cares and was incontinent with bowel and bladder. R1 had a diagnosis of anxiety and manic depression. [...]
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 nursing assistant (NA)-C was deemed competent upon hire or yearly thereafter to provide care to residents.
March 19, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate supplemental oxygen was delivered according to physician orders and failed to revise or develop a respiratory care plan for 2 of 2 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for respiratory care.
February 27, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
- E Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident mail was delivered on Saturdays for 1 of 1 residents (R8) who voiced concerns with mail delivery. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 22 residents residing in the facility.
- D Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide ongoing communication to residents about their rights (e.g., through resident groups). This had the potential to affect all 22 residents residing in the facility.
- D Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to have an integrated care plan to coordinate services between the facility and the hospice agency to ensure those services were being provided for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for hospice care.
Fire safety inspections
20 fire safety citations on file: 10 on January 2, 2026, 9 on November 14, 2024, 1 on February 27, 2024.
Every fire safety citation20 citations
- F Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
- E Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
- D Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- F Have exits that are accessible at all times.
- F Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- F Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- C Provide family notifications of emergency plan.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.77 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.90 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.41 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.86 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.01 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.5% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 33.3% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.49 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.91 on weekdays and 4.41 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.97 in April to June 2025 to 4.77 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.77 | 0.90 | 4.91 | 4.41 | 7.5% | 1 of 90 | 24 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.58 | 0.98 | 4.69 | 4.29 | 8.8% | 0 of 92 | 24 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.80 | 1.16 | 4.91 | 4.53 | 11.0% | 0 of 92 | 23 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.97 | 1.37 | 5.13 | 4.58 | 10.4% | 0 of 91 | 21 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.8 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.9 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: HEARTLAND SENIOR LIVING.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groskreutz, William | Corporate director | Individual | 08/22/2022 | |
| Ness, James | Corporate director | Individual | 03/03/2014 | |
| Noorlun, Yvonne | Corporate director | Individual | 02/28/2022 | |
| Suppalla, William | Corporate director | Individual | 03/03/2014 | |
| Weihe, Karen | Corporate director | Individual | 01/14/2019 | |
| Anderson, Jean | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/03/2014 | |
| Erickson, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/03/2014 | |
| Hardt, Heather | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/04/2018 | |
| Knoll, Christopher | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Hardt, Heather | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/04/2018 | |
| Langbehn, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Hardt, Heather | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/04/2018 | |
| Knoll, Christopher | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Langbehn, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 2, 2026: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on July 24, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 2, 2026: "Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on July 24, 2026: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Lakeview Methodist Health Care Center Fairmont, 13.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Good Samaritan Society - St. James St. James, 14.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Living Meadows at Luther - Madelia Madelia, 14.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- St. Lukes Lutheran Care Center Blue Earth, 21.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 6 citations
- Mapleton Community Home Mapleton, 24.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 16 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Truman Senior Living's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Truman Senior Living 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Truman Senior Living get at its last inspection?
- 3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 2, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has Truman Senior Living been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Truman Senior Living accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Truman Senior Living?
- CMS lists 14 owners and managers. Legal business name: HEARTLAND SENIOR LIVING.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.