Find a nursing home

Home / California / Sonoma

Valley of the Moon Post Acute

347 Andrieux St., Sonoma, CA 95476 · Sonoma County · (707) 935-5122

27 certified beds, about 26 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986

CMS abuse icon: cited for abuse in a recent inspection Inside a hospital Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555258 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 16, 2026, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).

Of 13 health citations since July 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,492 in the last three years; the largest was $8,492, and the latest is dated April 15, 2026.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.05 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.63 of those hours.

47.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
2D
9E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 16, 2026Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food according to professional standards for food safety for a facility census of 27 residents when:A large dented can was stored in the ready for use dry storage area,Expired food items were stored in the ready for use dry storage area,An opened food package was stored without any labeling in the ready for use dry storage area, and;Scratched and peeling plastic cutting boards were in use in the food preparation area. These failures created the potential for food contamination and food borne illness for a vulnerable resident population. Cross reference F908. 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/13/26 at 9:15 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM), a large dented can of pinto beans was found in the ready for use area. The DM stated the can should have been removed from stock.2. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 30, 2026
    Inspectors wroteF689 - Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/DevicesBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a timely post-fall risk evaluation assessment was completed following a resident fall, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident 32), reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in a missed opportunity to identify and address additional fall risk factors before Resident 32 experienced a second fall in the facility and placed him at an increased risk for potential injury.
April 15, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 16, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one (Resident 1) of five sampled resident's right to be free from physical abuse when Resident 1 was struck by Resident 2 during an altercation that occurred on 3/06/26. This failure resulted in Resident 1's suffering bruising and skin tears to the face and arms. Resident 1 also experienced lasting anxiety following the facility failure. A review of Resident 's admission Record (facility demographic) indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (oxygen and nutrients to part of the brain is blocked causing brain tissue death) with hemiplegia and hemiparesis (hemiparesis indicates weakness on one side of the body; [...]
October 11, 2024Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident right to know about, and had access to, the contact information for the Ombudsman (State Patient/Resident advocacy services) and California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and Federal and State Survey results. This failure had the potential for not allowing Residents or their family members to exercise their right to know contact advocates about their concerns regarding the care they received in the facility and how to view the results of the facility surveys and the plans of correction (A document from the facility that would state how to correct any deficiencies or findings, and to keep them from happening again.) prepared by the facility in response to a complaint investigation or recertification survey.
  2. E
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    F577 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents knew about, and had access to, the contact information for the Ombudsman (State Patient/Resident advocate services) and California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and Federal and State Survey results. This had the potential for not allowing Residents or their family members to exercise their right to know contact advocates about their concerns regarding the care they received in the facility and how to view the results of the facility surveys and the plans of correction.
  3. E
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to maintain a portable oxygen tank inventory and properly anticipate emergent respiratory care equipment needs for six Sampled Residents (Resident 4, Resident 2, Resident 1, Resident 13, Resident 80, Resident 6), and 2 Unsampled Resident (Resident 5, Resident 9) who received oxygen therapy. The facility's inability to ensure Resident's daily and emergent oxygen needs had the potential for Respiratory Distress (shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, and possible respiratory failure), Hypoxemia (oxygen deprivation) and potential for death, during a facility evacuation that required transport of residents to county shelters or private homes.
  4. E
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility: 1) Failed to ensure Registered Nurses (RNs) had accurate, verified competencies (verification of essential job functions; skills/ability required to perform safe nursing care) in their employee files when 2 of 2 sampled Registered Nurses (RN B and RN C) did not have documented, complete PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter) competencies per facility policy, and 2) Failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse L (LVN L) had accurate competencies in his employee file when LVN L's employee file indicated he had PICC line competencies, but LVN's are not legally nor professionally qualified to care for PICC lines. These deficiencies caused potential for unsafe nursing practice and potentially placed PICC residents at risk of harm. [...]
  5. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the safety of one sampled resident (Sampled Resident 1), when medication that was ordered to be administered on an empty stomach was administered at the same time as two medication that were ordered to be administered with food. This medication administration was the result of not following the physician's order and had the potential to result in medication not being absorbed properly and the risk of Sampled Resident 1 to experience side effects that included gastric upset, nausea and gastric reflux.
July 28, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    F727 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Director of Nursing (DON) on a full time basis for the last thee months. This failure prevented the oversight of a professional Registered Nurse (RN) in the management and direction of all aspects of the nursing services department that could adversely impact the care and treatment of residents residing in the facility.
  2. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not create a care plan for one of two residents (Resident 11) who was on supplemental oxygen (O2) for 7 months. This failure could result to oxygen toxicity or oxygen poisoning (lung damage that happens from breathing in too much extra [supplemental] oxygen), which can cause coughing, trouble breathing, and in severe cases it could potentially cause death.
  3. E
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and a review of records, it was determined that the facility failed to meet the pharmaceutical needs of its residents by not having proper procedures in place to ensure the accurate administration of all drugs. Specifically, during the administration of an insulin injection to Resident 25, it was observed that the injection site was not rotated, and the same site was used multiple times by several different nurses. This could potentially lead to an adverse reaction such as lipodystrophy (a disorder that affects how the body accumulates and stores fat).
  4. E
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, it was discovered that the facility pharmacist failed to report irregularities, and the facility itself did not take appropriate action in response to these irregularities. The facility pharmacist failed to identify the lack of insulin site rotation for Resident 25, which resulted in the resident at risk for lipodystrophy due to repeated injection at the same site. Lipodystrophy is a disorder that affects how the body accumulates and stores fat.
  5. E
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 4, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and a review of records, it was found that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. During the medication pass, three medication errors were observed out of twenty-nine opportunities, resulting in an error rate of 10%.

Fire safety inspections

13 fire safety citations on file: 1 on July 16, 2026, 3 on October 11, 2024, 9 on July 28, 2023.

Every fire safety citation13 citations
  1. C
    Install a two-hour-resistant firewall separation.
    K 133 · July 16, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Implement emergency and standby power systems.
    E 41 · October 11, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · October 11, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · October 11, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.
    E 15 · July 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Establish policies and procedures for volunteers.
    E 24 · July 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Implement emergency and standby power systems.
    E 41 · July 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Have an alternate power supply for its alarm system.
    K 344 · July 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · July 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. E
    Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
    K 781 · July 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. E
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · July 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · July 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · July 28, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
April 15, 2026Fine $8,492

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.054.523.86
Registered nurses0.630.670.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.484.093.42
Nurse aides2.55
Licensed practical nurses1.86
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)47.2%36.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover66.7%38.1%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 3.71 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.28 on weekdays and 4.48 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.84 in April to June 2025 to 5.05 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.050.635.284.48 0.0%0 of 9026
Oct to Dec 20254.940.455.164.39 0.0%4 of 9227
Jul to Sep 20255.030.635.364.17 0.0%0 of 9226
Apr to Jun 20254.840.535.184.00 0.0%0 of 9126
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
California, Jan to Mar 20264.360.594.523.972.3%0.5% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.610.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.51.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.81.63.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.69.814.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.74.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.812.015.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
35.022.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
8.511.212.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: SONOMA VALLEY HEALTH CARE DISTRICT.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Sonoma Valley Health Care DistrictOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2007
Armfield, BenjaminOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2001
Kaiser, KelleyOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/03/2025
Okolo, PatrickOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/06/2025
Stone, LisaOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2001
Welch, SherriOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/07/1992
Sonoma Valley Health Care DistrictAdp of the SNFOrganization05/21/2026
Armfield, BenjaminAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2021
Kaiser, KelleyAdp of the SNFIndividual11/03/2025
Okolo, PatrickAdp of the SNFIndividual10/06/2025
Stone, LisaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2001
Welch, SherriAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2007

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on October 11, 2024: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 11, 2024: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  4. How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 11, 2024: "Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being."

Other nursing homes nearby

California contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Valley of the Moon Post Acute's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Valley of the Moon Post Acute 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Valley of the Moon Post Acute get at its last inspection?
2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 16, 2026. The California average is 15.6.
Has Valley of the Moon Post Acute been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,492 in the last three years.
Does Valley of the Moon Post Acute accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Valley of the Moon Post Acute?
CMS lists 12 owners and managers. Legal business name: SONOMA VALLEY HEALTH CARE DISTRICT.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection