Find a nursing home

Home / California / Ventura

Ventura Post Acute

4020 Loma Vista Road, Ventura, CA 93003 · Ventura County · (805) 642-4196

71 certified beds, about 64 residents a day · For profit - Individual · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967

CMS high performing icon Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 055719 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 12, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).

None of its 17 health citations since June 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.70 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.68 of those hours.

25.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).

CMS links it to The Mandelbaum Family, an affiliated group of 18 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
14D
2E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 12, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was properly and routinely sanitized according to facility policy and procedures (P&P) and manufacturer's service manual. This failure had the potential to result in the growth of harmful microorganisms which can cause foodborne illness to its vulnerable residents.
  2. E
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure fingernail care was provided for 3 of 16 sampled residents (Residents 9, 43, and 45). This failure had the potential to negatively affect their self-esteem, comfort, and personal hygiene.
  3. E
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one emergency drug supply kit (e-kit) was secured when not in use. This failure had the potential to allow unauthorized personnel access to emergency drug supply.
  4. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were implemented for one of five sampled residents (Resident 6). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 6's needs not being met.
  5. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 27, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 14) received consistent professional care as a dialysis resident when the resident's dialysis access site was not assessed pre and post dialysis. In addition, licensed nurses documented in error. This failure had the potential for Resident 14 to have unassessed complications and resulted in an inaccurate medical record.
March 24, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed and appropriately implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Blood pressure (BP) parameters were not followed, as ordered, prior to Resident 1 receiving the medication Carvedilol (a medication used to lower BP). 2. The physician was not notified, as ordered, of Resident 1's elevated blood sugar levels on two occasions. These failures had the potential to result in the inappropriate delivery of care and services to the resident affecting health and safety.
April 5, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 18, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the exterior metal framed sliding glass door across the hallway that led to outside of the facility opens and closes properly. The sliding glass door partially opens and could not be securely closed . This failure has the potential for cold air from outside to go thru the unclosed glass sliding door, placing residents at risk to have a cold environment /temperature inside the facility.
December 8, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    F557 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents rights and dignity for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 17) was upheld when staff did not document what personal belongings the resident have and did not informed the resident of it's whereabouts . This failure had the potential for the resident to not have access to his own belongings which can result to loss of rights and also may cause some mental anguish .
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions in the facility kitchen area was maintained when the back wall of the dishwashing machine and the main drain basin floor were found with build up , uncleaned substance /rust , chipped and worned out tiles. This failure has the potential to harbor the growth of bacteria (microscopic living organisms that effect skin, lungs, brain, blood and other parts of your body) which can be spread to all .
  3. D
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a tool used to assess all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes) quarterly assessment was completed on time for 1 of 1 unsampled residents (Resident 18). This failure resulted in the non complaince of the assessment as set by the Centers of medicaid and medicare services (CMS).
  4. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 31, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS - a tool used to assess all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes) assessment reflected the accurate assessment for 3 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 560, Resident 50, and Resident 2) when: 1. Resident 560's language preference was not accurately reflected . 2. Resident 50's most recent fall was not reflected in the assessment. 3. Resident 2 's assessment did not reflect appropriate skin assessments, treatment, and wound care . This failure has the potential to not create an accurate resident condition which can affect the implementation or creation of a plan of care .
  5. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure : develop and update the comprehensive care plan, for 2 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 13 and Resident 17) when: 1. Resident 13's care plan did not reflect, a newly discovered medication allergy (Cefazolin- cephalosporin antibiotics - kills bacteria ) as stated in the Hospitalization admission Note (HAN) dated 1/6/23. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for an allergic reaction . 2. Resident 17 had no long term stay care plan when discharge plans were changed . This failure has the potential for resident's long term needs to be not met .
  6. D
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    F806 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 18, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 47) was not served food the resident was allergic to as indicated . This failure had the potential for the resident to have an allergic reaction which be detrimental to the resident's overall condition.
  7. D
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    F908 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to safely secure the gas pipe of the oven. This failure has the potential for broken pipes leading to gas leaks resulting to a fire . Findings . During an observation on 12/6/23 on 7:35 a.m., at the kitchen, the gas pipe located at the back of the oven has an inverse T-shaped wooden structure measuring 2X4 inches that supports the gas pipe but was not properly secured. During an interview on 12/6/23 at 8:20 a.m., with the Mainternance Supervisor (MTS), MTS verbalized I have been working here for about 40 years, I could not remember exactly when I placed the wooden stand but that was used to support the gas pipe. I never placed a more permanent fixture. During a review of Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Safety and Supervision of Residents dated 5/15, the Safety and Supervision of Residents indicated in part: [...]
June 24, 2022Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 20, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to formulate an advanced directive (a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated), for one of 16 sampled residents (Resident 1), and have this information be readily available in the resident's medical record. This failure had the potential for facility staff and emergency personnel to not be informed whether life-sustaining treatments be provided or not to the resident in the event of a medical emergency.
  2. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 20, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care for one of sixteen sampled residents (Resident 47) per regulation and facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Activities of Daily Living, Quality of Care, Routine Resident Monitoring, and Scope of Services. This facility failure has the potential for Resident 47 to have complications and difficulty walking.
  3. D
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    F825 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 20, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of sixteen sampled residents (Resident 18) received restorative nursing assistance (RNA - person-centered nursing care designed to improve or maintain the functional ability of residents, so they can achieve their highest level of well-being possible) services per physician order and facility policy and procedure (P&P), Rehabilitative Nursing Care, dated April 2013. This facility failure resulted in Resident 18 not being out of bed, and has the potential for: 1. loneliness and isolation; 2. worsening stage IV pressure ulcer injury; and 3. Resident 18 not achieving or maintaining optimal level of care.

Fire safety inspections

7 fire safety citations on file: 3 on June 12, 2025, 2 on December 8, 2023, 2 on June 24, 2022.

Every fire safety citation7 citations
  1. F
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · June 12, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · June 12, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · June 12, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · December 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · December 8, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · June 24, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · June 24, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.704.523.86
Registered nurses0.680.670.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.284.093.42
Nurse aides2.71
Licensed practical nurses1.31
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)25.0%36.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover12.5%38.1%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.74 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.88 on weekdays and 4.28 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.81 in April to June 2025 to 4.70 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.700.684.884.28 0.0%0 of 9064
Oct to Dec 20254.690.624.894.18 0.0%0 of 9265
Jul to Sep 20254.760.574.954.28 0.0%0 of 9266
Apr to Jun 20254.810.554.994.38 0.0%0 of 9165
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
California, Jan to Mar 20264.360.594.523.972.3%0.5% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
11.210.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.61.63.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.61.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.19.814.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.64.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
25.612.015.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
21.522.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
9.611.212.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.32.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.41.61.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: VENTURA POST ACUTE LLC. CMS links this home to The Mandelbaum Family, a group of 18 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Simcha and Janet Mandelbaum Family Trust5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization20%12/01/2021
The Bentzion Mandelbaum 2021 Irrevocable Gift Trust No. 25% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization50%12/01/2021
The Janet Mandelbaum 2021 Irrevocable Gift Trust No 25% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization16%12/01/2021
The Simcha Mandelbaum 2021 Irrevocable Gift Trust No. 25% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization14%12/01/2021
Castro-Garcia, MariaCorporate directorIndividual11/06/2019
Mandelbaum, JanetCorporate directorIndividual12/01/2021
Castro-Garcia, MariaCorporate officerIndividual11/06/2019
Mandelbaum, JanetCorporate officerIndividual12/01/2021
Pham, JulieCorporate officerIndividual03/16/2000
Williams, ClintonCorporate officerIndividual05/04/2010
Agapito, Maricarl AgapitoOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/09/2023
Anos, ChristelleOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2016
Bradley, ChandraOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2016
Jones, ReneeOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2016
Marin, RafaelOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2016
Morla, DoreenaOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/21/2022
Pham, JulieOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/16/2000
Phan, DuongOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2016
Valiveti, VinodOperational/managerial controlIndividual04/01/2021
Williams, ClintonOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/04/2010
Mandelbaum, BrendaIndividual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNFIndividual06/27/2025
HansenAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2023
Agapito, Maricarl AgapitoAdp of the SNFIndividual10/09/2023
Anos, ChristelleAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2016
Bradley, ChandraAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2016
Jones, ReneeAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2016
Marin, RafaelAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2016
Morla, DoreenaAdp of the SNFIndividual03/21/2022
Pham, JulieAdp of the SNFIndividual03/16/2000
Phan, DuongAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2016
Valiveti, VinodAdp of the SNFIndividual04/01/2021
Williams, ClintonAdp of the SNFIndividual05/04/2010

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 12, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 12, 2025: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 8, 2023: "Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions."
  4. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 12, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."

Other nursing homes nearby

California contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Ventura Post Acute's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Ventura Post Acute 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Ventura Post Acute get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 12, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
Has Ventura Post Acute been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Ventura Post Acute accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Ventura Post Acute?
CMS lists 32 owners and managers, and links the home to The Mandelbaum Family. Legal business name: VENTURA POST ACUTE LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection