Find a nursing home

Home / Colorado / Westminster

Village Care and Rehabilitation Center, the

9221 Wadsworth Pkwy, Westminster, CO 80021 · Jefferson County · (303) 403-2900

60 certified beds, about 56 residents a day · Non profit - Church related · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998

Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 065367 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on December 19, 2024, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Colorado average is 8.7, the national average 9.2).

Of 15 health citations since August 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.12 hours per resident per day, against 3.72 across Colorado and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.74 of those hours.

43.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Colorado average 47.1%).

CMS links it to Covenant Living, an affiliated group of 15 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
8D
6E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
December 19, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 6, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure glucometers were sanitized appropriately.
  2. D
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement an activities program that met the interests of and supported the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for one (#32) of two residents reviewed for activities out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to invite Resident #32 to group activities and meet the socialization needs for the resident.
  3. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#42 and #45) of two residents out of 29 sample residents were free of significant medication errors. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #45 was administered his schizoaffective disorder medication per the physician orders; and, -Ensure Resident #42 was administered his diabetes medication per the physician orders.
October 8, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 5, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents reviewed for falls (#1) out of four sample residents received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent falls with injury. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation therapy after undergoing surgical repair for a fractured right femur. The facility was aware upon the resident's admission for skilled nursing services that she had several falls in her prior living setting which resulted in the need for surgical repair after the resident fell and fractured her right femur. The facility also was aware that the resident needed to maintain non-weight-bearing status of her fractured leg. The resident was in the facility for two days when she fell on 7/17/24 at the bedside. Following this first fall, the resident fell an additional four times. [...]
June 21, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 21, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered care plans consistent with professional standards of practice and the residents goals and preferences for four (#23, #26, #34 and #35) of six residents out of 13 sample residents who were prescribed anticoagulant medication. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident's #23, #26, #34 and #35 were provided a comprehensive care plan focus for anticoagulant therapy. Where the care focus included measurable objectives, interventions and timeframes in line with the resident's medical condition, goals and preferences for anticoagulant therapy; in order for staff to meet the resident's care needs.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection for two out of three units at the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure housekeeping staff were following the proper cleaning techniques for cleaning resident rooms and disinfecting high frequency touched areas (call lights, door handles and hand rails); -Ensure surface disinfectant times were followed; and, -Ensure residents were offered an opportunity for hand hygiene prior to dining.
  3. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 24, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there was a need to alter treatment significantly for one resident (#41) of two residents reviewed out of 35 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to make a timely notify Resident #41, the resident's representative and the prescribing physician (wound specialist) that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) made a decision to not start the resident on antibiotic treatment prescribed by the wound care physician (WP).
  4. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, observations and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#17) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living of 35 sample residents were provided the necessary care and services to maintain or improve their level of functioning. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #17 received timely incontinent care after the resident had an episode of involuntary leakage of urine and feces.
  5. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to consistently provide pain management services for one (#14) of two residents reviewed for pain management out of a 35 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the hospice provider in a timely manner for effective care and treatment to keep Resident #14 comfortable and free of pain at the end of her life.
  6. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 14, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the medical record was complete and accurate in keeping with accepted standards of practice for one (#41) out of 35 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #41's medical record regarding the clinical justification for why a prescribed treatment for wound care treatment, antibiotic medication was not provided was documented and documented accurately. Cross-reference F580, timely notification to the resident prescribing physician, the attending physician and the resident representative.
August 29, 2019Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 11, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff did not touch the inside of plates and bowls with bare hands or soiled hot mitt when food was served on the memory care unit. I. Professional reference The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations (CRFERR), revised January 2019, read in pertinent part, .Employees prevent bare hand contact with ready-to-eat food by properly using suitable utensils such as deli tissue, spatulas, tongs, single-use gloves, or dispensing equipment. If used, single-use gloves shall be used for only one task, such as working with ready-to-eat food. Single-use gloves shall be used for no other purpose, and discarded when damaged, when interruptions occur in the operation, or when the task is completed. [...]
  2. E
    Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
    F920 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 11, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate space for a home-like dining experience in one (the memory care unit) out of three dining areas, in order to accommodate residents during meal times. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Sufficient space to allow Resident #46 to move in and out of the dining room independently and accommodate all of the residents in the secure unit; and -Residents already seated at the table would not have to be moved in order to make space for additional residents entering and exiting the dining area. A. Resident status Resident #46, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the August 2019 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances, obsessive compulsive disorder, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. [...]
  3. E
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    F947 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 11, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure four out of five employees required in-service training for nurse aides, no less than 12 hours per year was calculated by the employment date, and included dementia management and resident abuse prevention training. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure four (#4, #5, #6 and #7) out of five certified nurse aides' (CNAs) in-service training record reviewed, received at least 12 hours of annual training.
  4. D
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    F638 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 11, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly assessments were completed in the required time frame for two (#46 and #1) of two out of 33 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the quarterly review assessments were submitted timely as specified in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI).
  5. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 11, 2019
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for two (#31 and #40) out of 33 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #31 and #40 had a care plan for elopement/wandering behaviors with interventions and failed to include the use of a wander guard.

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeColoradoUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.123.723.86
Registered nurses0.740.820.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.453.293.42
Nurse aides2.49
Licensed practical nurses0.89
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)43.7%47.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover43.8%44.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.31 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.39 on weekdays and 3.45 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.30 in April to June 2025 to 4.12 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.120.744.393.45 0.0%0 of 9056
Oct to Dec 20254.370.874.583.83 0.0%0 of 9252
Jul to Sep 20254.170.834.373.65 1.5%0 of 9255
Apr to Jun 20254.300.954.513.76 9.7%0 of 9153
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Colorado, Jan to Mar 20263.590.763.753.185.9%0.2% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Colorado

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Colorado, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.78$21.42 to $24.0022,240
LPNs and LVNs$35.52$29.76 to $38.374,920
Registered nurses$48.20$40.67 to $52.3754,490
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeColoradoUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
31.713.413.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.00.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.93.43.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.61.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
35.013.314.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.83.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.720.015.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
19.320.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
8.012.112.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: COVENANT LIVING OF COLORADO. CMS links this home to Covenant Living, a group of 15 nursing homes averaging 4.4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Covenant Living Communities & Services5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/26/1988
Cunliffe, TerriW-2 managing employeeIndividual05/22/2015
Holt, JodyW-2 managing employeeIndividual06/02/2017
Bentley, SarahCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2019
Christensen, PamelaCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2013
Davis, KaraCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2019
Eastburg, MarkCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2019
Kincannon, KurtCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2019
Manlove, MattCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2017
Martin, RobertCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2019
Nelson, RichardCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2019
Oxendale, RogerCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2017
Rinard, DaleCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2019
Vanover, AndrewCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2019
Wenrich, JohnCorporate directorIndividual07/01/2019
Cunliffe, TerriCorporate officerIndividual05/22/2015
Erickson, DavidCorporate officerIndividual01/31/2008
Erickson, RebekahCorporate officerIndividual07/01/2019
Holt, JodyCorporate officerIndividual06/02/2017
Holt, JodyOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/02/2017

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on December 19, 2024: "Provide activities to meet all resident's needs."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 21, 2023: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 19, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on December 19, 2024: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Colorado contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Colorado. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Village Care and Rehabilitation Center, the's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Village Care and Rehabilitation Center, the 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Village Care and Rehabilitation Center, the get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 19, 2024. The Colorado average is 8.7.
Has Village Care and Rehabilitation Center, the been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Village Care and Rehabilitation Center, the accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Village Care and Rehabilitation Center, the?
CMS lists 20 owners and managers, and links the home to Covenant Living. Legal business name: COVENANT LIVING OF COLORADO.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection