Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation
6050 Hospital Dr, Abilene, TX 79606 · Taylor County · (325) 692-1533
120 certified beds, about 113 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2009
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676219 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 14, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 15 health citations since February 2024, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $26,364 in the last three years; the largest was $26,364, and the latest is dated February 14, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.30 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.58 of those hours.
50.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.
May 14, 2026Standard inspection · 7 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide a resident group with private space and prevent staff to attend without the invitation of the group for 1 of 1 group council meeting observed. The facility failed to prevent LVN E from entering a resident council meeting while in progress. This failure placed residents that could participate in a resident council at risk of not having the right to voice their concerns without staff being present or overhearing their concerns and conduct resident council meetings without interference.
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 8 of 21 (Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #7, Resident #9, Resident #21, Resident #24, Resident #44, and Resident #81) residents reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. [...]
- E Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure orders were provided for the resident's immediate care and needs for 4 (Resident #7, Resident #9, Resident #24, and Resident #44) of 16 residents reviewed for care supervised by a physician. The facility failed to ensure a physician order was put into place/received to admit Resident #7, Resident #9, Resident #24, and Resident #44 to an Alzheimer's certified secure care unit. The facility failed to obtain a diagnosis to admit Resident #24 to an Alzheimer's certified secure care unit. These failures could affect residents by not having their medical care supervised by a physician.
- E Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility must not use any individual working in the facility as a nurse aide for more than four months on a full-time basis unless that individual has completed a training and competency evaluation program for 1 of 8 (NA C) non-certified nurse aides reviewed. The facility failed to ensure full-time NA C was certified within four months of the date of hire. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving inappropriate care from an individual whose skill level was not known.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure kitchen staff properly secured hair in hair nets when handling and serving food. These failures could place residents who received food from the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food borne illness.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat residents with respect, dignity and care for each resident in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #18), observed in the confidential group interview. The facility failed to prevent LVN E from taking Resident #18's blood pressure and administering medication during a resident council meeting on 5/14/26., in front of 9 other residents. This failure could result in a diminished quality of life and a loss of self-esteem for the residents.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #9) of 21 residents whose assessments were reviewed for accuracy. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's MDS assessment accurately reflected the use of a walker. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs.
March 12, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 3 medication carts (medication cart for Unit #1 and medication cart for Unit #2) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33, and Resident #71's natural tears eye drops were labeled with an open date on the medication cart for Unit #1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12, and Resident #81's natural tears eye drops were labeled with an open date on the medication cart for Unit #2. These failures could affect residents prescribed medications in the facility and place them at risk for not receiving the correct medications, medication misuse, or receiving expired medications. Findings Included: [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #50 and Resident #48) and 1 of 2 staff (LVN A) reviewed for blood glucose monitoring. The facility failed to ensure that LVN A cleaned the glucometer (capillary-blood sampling devices) after using it for Resident #50 and before using it for Resident #48. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination, infections, and a decrease in quality of life.
February 14, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
- H Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent significant medication error for 1 of 33 residents (Resident #77) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to follow physician's order by not administering Lasix 20mg (diuretic medication to reduce swelling) as needed every 24 hours for Resident #77. These failures could place residents at risk for decreased level of functioning and quality of life.
- G Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #77) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to follow physician's order for daily weights for Resident #77 for 01/26/2024 and 01/27/2024. These failures could place residents at risk for decreased level of functioning and quality of life.
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen's reviewed for meal service. Facility kitchen staff failed to discard food after handles touched with bare hands fell into pureed bread pan and roll bin during meal service. These failures could place residents at risk of food borne illness that ate from the kitchen.
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the comprehensive assessment for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #20) of 4 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that addressed bed and chair alarms for Resident #2. The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that addressed a chair alarm for Resident #20. These failures could place residents at risk for falls and/or injury, negatively impact the resident's quality of life, as well as the quality of care and services received.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for one (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #20's fall matt was placed beside her bed as ordered by physician. This failure could put residents at increased risk for accidents and injury.
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors that included: The total number and the actual hours worked by the registered nurses, licensed practical nurses or licensed vocational nurses and certified nurse aides directly responsible for resident care per shift for 1 of 3 days reviewed. The facility failed to ensure the daily staffing information was posted in a prominent location on 01/30/2024. This failure could place residents, their families, and visitors at risk of not knowing how many staff are currently working to provide care on all shifts. Findings Included: During an observation on 01/30/2024 at 9:12 a.m., daily staffing posted in hallways for previous date of 01/29/2024. [...]
Fire safety inspections
9 fire safety citations on file: 4 on May 14, 2026, 2 on March 12, 2025, 3 on February 14, 2024.
Every fire safety citation9 citations
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- E Have an alternate power supply for its alarm system.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- F Have an alternate power supply for its alarm system.
- F Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 14, 2024 | Fine | $26,364 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.30 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.58 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.01 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.81 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.91 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 50.5% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 40.9% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.64 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.42 on weekdays and 3.01 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.33 in April to June 2025 to 3.30 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.30 | 0.58 | 3.42 | 3.01 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 113 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.36 | 0.58 | 3.47 | 3.10 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 110 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.26 | 0.52 | 3.39 | 2.92 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 114 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.33 | 0.50 | 3.45 | 3.04 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 107 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Texas
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.0 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.8 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.6 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.6 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.1 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: PALO PINTO COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Korkmas, Ross | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/06/2019 | |
| Korkmas, Ross | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/06/2019 | |
| Advanced Hcs LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2014 | |
| Palo Pinto County Hospital District | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2017 | |
| Lichtschein, Teddy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Meisner, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2021 | |
| Scheiner, Eliezer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/01/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 14, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Wesley Court Health Center Abilene, 0.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Mesa Springs Healthcare Center Abilene, 2.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Wisteria Place Abilene, 2.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Avir at Abilene Abilene, 5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Willowcreek Rehab and Nursing Abilene, 5.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- The Oaks at Radford Hills Healthcare Center Abilene, 5.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 49 citations
- Avir at Coronado Abilene, 6.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 47 citations
- Hendrick Skilled Nursing Facility Abilene, 6.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 8 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
- 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 14, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $26,364 in the last three years.
- Does Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation?
- CMS lists 7 owners and managers. Legal business name: PALO PINTO COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.