4934 S 7th St., Abilene, TX 79605 · Taylor County · (325) 692-2172
96 certified beds, about 76 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1994
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675350 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 6, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 24 health citations since September 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $23,794 in the last three years; the largest was $23,794, and the latest is dated February 27, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.74 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.41 of those hours.
57.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality and treat residents with respect and dignity for 3 of 12 (Residents # 62, Resident # 45, and Resident # 22 ) residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to prevent CNA E from standing over Resident# 62, Resident # 45, and Resident # 22 while assisting residents with eating their meal in the dining area. The facility failed to prevent CNA E from referring to Resident# 62, Resident # 45, and Resident # 22 who needed assistance with meals, as feeders. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to send and receive mail, and to receive letters, package and other materials delivered to the facility or the resident through a means other than a postal service, including the right to privacy of such communications for 5 of 5 residents (confidential residents) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure staff distributed mail received on Saturdays to the residents. This failure could result in residents not receiving mail in a timely manner and a diminished quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, and comfortable environment for 5 of 20 (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], 104 and the East Conference Room) rooms observed for environmental conditions. The facility failed to ensure rooms 101,102, 103, 104 and the East side Conference Room sinks had hot water. These failures could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, discomfort, and safety.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of a med error rate of 5% or greater for 3 (Resident #10, Resident # 20 and Resident #25) of 5 residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure the medication error rate (11.5%) was less than 5%. This failure placed residents at risk of incorrect doses of medications and optimal therapeutic response.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, for 1 of 1 refrigerator in the secure unit. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator on the secure unit that was used for patient snack storage was clean and temperatures were being checked and recorded. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness, compromised nutritional health status, and being served food items that may not be fresh, taste stale, or be contaminated.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #70) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions for Resident #70 who had an Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign posted on her room door. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk for cross contamination and infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure staff practiced appropriate hand hygiene during meal prep.2. The facility failed to ensure staff wore effective hair restraints while in the kitchen area. These failures could place residents who received food from the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #'s 2 and 4 ) reviewed for accuracy of records, in that: RN A failed to document the wound care for Resident #2's open areas to his right and left buttocks on 4/12/25 during the 6 AM to 6PM shift. RN A failed to document that Resident # 2 had a privacy bag on his catheter bag , a catheter securement device to hold his catheter tubing in place, and that he had a size 16 French to beside drainage and catheter care was administered during the 6 AM to 6 PM shift on 4/12/25. RN B failed to document the wound care for Resident #4's open areas to her right and left buttocks on 4/12/25 during the 6 AM to 6 PM shift. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1(Resident # 4) of 2 residents observed for wound care. The facility failed to ensure the wound care nurse washed or sanitized her hands between glove changes while performing incontinent care and wound care on Resident #4. These failures could place residents at risk of infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain hot water below 110°F for 5 of 8 (Resident #60's sink, RM17 E sink, East Hall shower room sink, Resident #168, Resident #167, and Resident # 14's shared sink and RM [ROOM NUMBER] E sink) bathroom reviewed for water temperature. 1. The temperature of sink in RM [ROOM NUMBER]E was 150°F. 2. The temperature of the East Hall Shower Room Resident 150°F. 3. The temperature of Resident #168, Resident #167, and Resident #14's shared sink was 140°F. 4. The temperature of Resident #60's sink was 136.4°F. 5. The temperature of sink in RM [ROOM NUMBER]E was 125.2°F. 6. The shower water temperature fluctuated, becoming hotter during use for Resident #23 and Resident #1 An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 02/25/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:00pm. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to purchase a surety bond, or otherwise provide assurance satisfactory to the secretary, to assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility for 1 of 1 surety bonds reviewed. The facility failed to ensure that the facility's $30,000.00 surety bond was enough to cover the $32,6635 total residents' trust fund account balance. This deficient practice could affect all residents who deposited personal funds with the facility, and place residents at-risk of their personal funds not being assured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional who was a therapeutic recreation specialist or an activity professional for 1 of 1 activity director (AD) reviewed for qualifications. The facility failed to ensure the AD was a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional that met state licensing requirements. This failure could place residents at risk for reduced quality of life due to lack of activities that were individualized to match the skills, abilities, and interests/preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed the ensure physician visits were conducted within 2-7 days of admission, once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days for 3 of 24 residents (Resident #22, Resident #23, and Resident #50) who were review for physician visits. 1. The facility failed to have Resident #22 seen by a physician within 2-7 days of readmission [DATE]), once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days. 2. The facility failed to have Resident #23 seen by a physician within 2-7 days of readmission [DATE]), once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days. 3. The facility failed to have Resident #50 seen by physician within 2-7 days of readmission [DATE]), once every 30 calendar days for the first 90 calendar days. This deficient practice could lead to a decline in health status or untreated conditions.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. 1. Hair net was not used for the DA, while he entered the kitchen. 2. Hand hygiene was not performed by CNA-C and the AD while passing trays in the hallway. These failures could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for contamination and food borne illnesses.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to inform residents in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care and treatment for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to obtain a signed consent for admission to reside onto the facility's Memory Care Unit. This failure could affect residents who were placed and received care placed on the Memory Care Unit without informed consent.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care plan and provide a summary of their baseline care plan to residents for 1 (Resident #168) of 10 residents reviewed for care plan completion. The facility failed to complete Resident #168's baseline care plan within the required 48-hour timeframe. This failure could place residents who were newly admitted at risk for not receiving necessary care and services or having important care needs identified.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in permanently affixed compartments during medication storage inspection for 1 (cart #1) of 5 medication carts reviewed for storage. The facility failed to ensure medication cart #1 was locked and secured while unattended. This failure could result in a drug diversion.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of 3 (Resident #103, Resident #104, and Resident #202) of 8 residents reviewed for care plan completion. The facility failed to complete Resident #103's, Resident #104, and Resident #202 baseline care plan within the required 48-hour timeframe. This failure could place residents who were newly admitted at risk for not receiving necessary care and services or having important care needs identified.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The facility failed to ensure that staff sanitized the thermometer while taking temperature of food. These failures could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for infection control procedures for 3 of 5 (#4, #17, and #44) residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to follow their Infection Control policy regarding CDC guidelines of performing the Flu test in conjunction with their COVID-19 testing. this failure could place residents at risk of the spread of infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided respiratory care received care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #11 and Resident #42) reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility failed to provide Oxygen (O2) in use sign on resident doorways for Resident #11 and #42. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate respiratory care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual nutritional needs for 1 of 1 lunch meal reviewed. The facility failed to ensure the recipe was followed when prepared pureed Seasoned Greens. This failure could place residents at-risk of inadequate nutrition and weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that were complete and accurate for 2 (Resident # 8 and Resident # 17) of 5 residents reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure smoking assessments were accurate for Resident #8 and Resident #17. This failure could place residents at risk of having errors in care and treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect for 1 of 4 staff (CNA-B) reviewed for background screenings. The facility failed to provide evidence of completion of an annual EMR for CNA-B. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect.
12 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 6, 2026, 5 on February 27, 2025, 5 on January 10, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| February 27, 2025 | Fine | $23,794 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 2.74 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.44 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.69 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.64 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 57.7% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 57.1% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.56 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.85 on weekdays and 2.44 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.93 in April to June 2025 to 2.74 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 2.74 | 0.41 | 2.85 | 2.44 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 76 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.72 | 0.42 | 2.84 | 2.42 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 71 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 2.71 | 0.51 | 2.82 | 2.43 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 68 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 2.93 | 0.51 | 3.05 | 2.62 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 63 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.9 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.8 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.7 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 22.8 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.0 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Willowcreek Rehab and Nursing's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 16 eligible stays.
10.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 41 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 19 eligible stays.
48.5% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 33 residents counted.
1.9% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 54 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CHILDRESS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Childress County Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 04/01/2017 |
| Holcomb, Holly | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/29/2021 | |
| Stratton, Emilee | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/18/2018 | |
| Evergreen Holdco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/14/2025 | |
| Gold Tx Trust | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/14/2025 | |
| Silver Tx Trust | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/15/2025 | |
| Willowcreek Rehab and Nursing LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/14/2025 | |
| Silberstein, Ari | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| 4934 S. 7th Street LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2023 | |
| 4934 S. 7th Street Tic LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2023 | |
| Gamfal LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2023 | |
| Lichtschein Family 2012 Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2023 | |
| Scheiner Family Trust 2012 | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2023 | |
| Scheiner Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2023 | |
| Willowcreek Rehab and Nursing LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/14/2025 | |
| Banes, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/09/2024 | |
| Gao, Min | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2011 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.