Home / California / Solvang
Atterdag Care Center
636 Atterdag Road, Solvang, CA 93463 · Santa Barbara County · (805) 688-5645
50 certified beds, about 48 residents a day · Non profit - Other · Medicare and Medicaid since 1973
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 056353 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 9, 2026, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 32 health citations since July 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.85 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.44 of those hours.
19.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 32 health citations on file.
April 10, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) after Resident had multiple falls on 2/17/26,3/4/26, and 3/10/26, This facility failure placed Resident 1 at higher risk for falls with injuries. During a review of the admission Record (AR) for Resident 1, admission date 8/26/24, The AR indicated Resident 1 was a [AGE] year old male with diagnosis including Senile Degeneration of the Brain (Progressive loss of cognitive function characterized by memory loss, confusion, behavioral changes, and impaired daily functions) and Alzheimer's Disease (Progressive, incurable disease causing brain shrinkage and neuron death characterized by memory loss, cognitive decline, and behavioral changes), Adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, Abnormalities of gait and mobility. [...]
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interview, and policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure the medical record contained documentation for a reason as needed (PRN) medication was given for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in an incomplete medical record for a resident medication administration requirement. [...]
January 9, 2026Standard inspection · 11 citations
- D Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to meet federal regulatory requirements when the clinical record for one of three sampled residents (Resident 8) had no documented justification for extending a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) order beyond 14 days. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 8 receiving an unnecessary psychotropic medication which could affect the resident's health and safety.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were properly implemented and documented in the clinical record for two of three sampled residents (Residents 8 and 2) when:1. Monitoring for wander guard device (a monitoring device used to ensure safety for residents at risk for elopement/wandering) placement and function was not implemented and documented in Resident 8's clinical record.2. Monitoring for pacemaker (a small, battery-powered device that prevents the heart from beating too slowly) status and function was not implemented and documented in Resident 2's clinical record. These monitoring oversight failures inaccurately reflect these residents' current health statuses which could potentially compromise their health and safety.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise one out of five sampled residents (Resident 36) care plan following minimum data set (MDS - a standardized, comprehensive assessment tool used to collect essential resident data) assessments. This failure resulted in inaccurate care planning for Resident 36's healthcare needs. [...]
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of resident care and services were performed within acceptable professional nursing standards for three of six sampled residents (Residents 8, 45 and 36) when:1. Resident 8 missed their medication on several occasions, and there was no subsequent follow-up by the nursing staff.2. Resident 45's oxygen (O2) saturations (02 sats- measure of 02 in the blood) were not consistently documented in the clinical record.3. Resident 36 was treated with Calmoseptine Ointment (a multi-purpose moisture barrier used to soothe and protect irritated skin from moisture, itching, and discomfort) for a wound without a physician's order. These failures had the potential to result in unsafe nursing care practices which could compromise the health and safety of these residents.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to obtain monthly weights for one of four sampled residents (Resident 4). This failure had the potential for undetected weight fluctuations that could signal underlying health problems.
- D Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician provided timely consultation or treatment when contacted by the facility to address a change in condition for two of five sampled residents' (Residents 23 and 28). This deficient practice resulted in a delay in care and treatment to meet Residents 23's and 28's immediate care needs and had the potential to result in an avoidable deterioration in health. During review of the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Change of Condition, dated 9/30/24, the P&P indicated in part, Purpose: To ensure that appropriate care and documentation occurs when residents experience a change of condition. Procedure: 2. Notify the attending physician promptly.5. [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff signed the controlled drug record after administering medication. This failure had the potential to result in unauthorized tampering and diversion of resident medications.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of expired medical supplies from a wound treatment cart (a mobile cart containing equipment, and supplies needed to treat wounds.)This facility failure had the potential for staff to utilize deteriorated and ineffective healthcare supplies for treatment of patients.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety requirements were met when:1) Two dietary aides (DAs 1 and 2) did not completely cover their hair, with the required hair restraint, while in the food preparation area. 2) Dietary staff did not follow the facility's policy and procedure when cleaning and sanitizing kitchen surfaces. 3) Contaminated food was not removed from dry food storage area. These failures had the potential to cause food borne illness to the residents. 1) During an observation on 1/9/26 at 9:41 a.m. with Director of Nutrition Services (DNS), in the food preparation area, DAs 1 and 2 hair restraints were noted not properly covering the hair area. [...]
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the informed consent [a resident's right to make an informed voluntary decision about their care, requiring providers to clearly explain their health status, treatment risks/benefits, alternatives (including refusal)] for psychotropic medication (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) had accurate information for one of three sampled residents (Resident 8). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 8 receiving inappropriate care and treatment.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: Laundry washing machine water temperatures were below the minimum required temperature for infection control. Personal protective equipment (PPE - protective equipment such as gloves, gowns, masks, and eye protection that creates a barrier to protect patients, healthcare workers from infectious materials, bloodborne pathogens, and other hazards, and to prevent the spread of illness to others) was not readily available in four out of four residents (Residents 6, 27, 36, and 48) on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - Infection control measures the involves wearing PPE for specific high-contact tasks such as bathing, transfers, and wound care for at-risk residents to stop germ spread). [...]
November 18, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation by Social Services Designee (SSD) was completed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) medical records regarding allegations of abuse involving Resident 1. This facility failure resulted in Resident 1's medical record not accurately reflecting SSD follow-up on abuse allegations, potentially impacting the adequacy of care for Resident 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, [undated], the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was 94 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: [...]
July 8, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the personal property inventory list was updated for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This facility failure had the potential for Resident 1's belongings to be lost or unaccounted for.
January 24, 2025Standard inspection · 9 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. The high temperature dish machine was not reaching 150 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for the wash cycle and 180 degrees F for the rinse cycle and the facility did not have a mechanism to verify the plate level temperature was reached according to their policy and procedure; and 2. [NAME] 2 (C2) did not change gloves after touching raw meat then touching other items. These failures resulted in equipment, utensils, dishware and silverware not being properly cleaned and sanitized and had the potential to result in the growth of microorganisms which can cause foodborne illness for the 49 residents eating food from the kitchen.
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record for resident and interview with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/23/2025, regarding resident 20's blood pressures, the facility had failed to ensure that this resident's blood pressure monitoring had been ordered by the resident's physician and not by the facility's nursing staff. The facility also failed to develop a policy and procedure which identified hypotension for the nursing staff. The facility's failure had the potential to put this resident at risk of severe hypotension which could result in ultimate organ failure and shock.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the medication refrigerator temperature twice a day and maintain the temperature within acceptable range. This failure had the potential for the residents to receive ineffective medications due to improper storage.
- E Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a well-balanced, physician prescribed diet that met their nutritional needs when meal ticket and diet order did not match for seven (7) residents (Residents 7, 23, 29, 34, 35, 37, and 38). This failure had the potential for residents to receive incorrect diets and have nutritional deficits.
- E Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed when: 1. The incorrect portion sizes for meat and vegetables were served for the puree diet during the lunch meal on 1/22/25 for four residents (Residents 2, 3, 29, 35); and 2. The incorrect portion sizes were served for one resident (Resident 30) for the lunch meal on 1/21/25. This failure has the potential to result in residents not having their nutritional needs met.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a form that documents a resident's treatment wishes in the event of a medical emergency) matched the electronic medical record (EMR) in one of one sampled resident (Resident 23). This failure had the potential to cause a delay in receiving or incorrectly administering life-sustaining treatments.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) services for one of three sampled resident (Resident 27). This failure had the potential for care and services not to be provided to Resident 27 that could potentially cause a decline in mobility and muscle strength.
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the medical record for resident, interview with the resident's nurse, and interview with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/23/2025, regarding resident 247, the facility failed to ensure that Standards of Practice regarding Tachycardic pulses which resulted in abnormal results, had been addressed by the facility and medical staff. The facility also failed to develop a policy and procedure which identified tachycardia. This failure had the potential to put this resident at risk for a heart attack or a stroke.
- D Keep all essential equipment working safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure and validate the dishwashing machine was functioning properly and was in safe operating condition when the temperatures of the wash and rinse were not reaching manufacturer's directions. This failure had the potential to result in temperatures not reaching proper temperature levels which led to all the dishware, silverware, utensils, pots and pans not being sanitized to which can result in the growth of microorganisms which can lead to food borne illness for the highly susceptible population that was eating at the facility. The facility census was 49.
July 28, 2023Standard inspection · 8 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food handling and sanitation when: 1. Expired pizza sauce per the facility's refrigerated shelf- life guidance was available for use in the walk-in refrigerator. 2. Opened bag of cheese was not dated when opened to have a system to follow the facility's Refrigerated Storage Chart, shelf-life guidance. 3. The dry food storage room stored an undated opened bag of pasta, multiple large, unopened canned foods not dated with a received date, ingredient bins containing flour, and thicken-up were not dated, and a dented can of tuna was available for use. 4. The wall located by the clean side of the high temperature dish machine had extensive black colored substance on the surface of the wall. [...]
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure standard infection control practices were followed when: 1. A Housekeeping Staff (HK 1) did not use gloves while sweeping and collecting trash inside a resident's room (room [ROOM NUMBER]), and did not perform hand hygiene after contact with potentially contaminated items. 2. A Licensed Nurse (LN 1) did not sanitize the handheld inhaler of one unsampled resident (Resident 34) before and after use and did not perform hand hygiene after contact with the resident. 3. LN 5 did not sanitize a glucometer test kit (a kit containing test strips and a device used to measure blood sugar) and perform hand hygiene after checking the blood sugar of one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 24). 4. [...]
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate a care plan for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 19), to prevent a pressure ulcer (an injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue) on the buttocks from developing or getting worse. This failure resulted in the development of two stage I (first stage- shearing off of the first layer of the skin ) pressure ulcers to the left and right buttocks.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate, and effective system for monitoring parameters of nutritional status when: 1. An order for a therapeutic (to cure or restore to health) liquid nutritional supplement (Mighty Shake) was not documented as being provided and lacked documentation of quantity of consumption of the therapeutic nutrition supplement for effective monitoring pertaining to parameters of nutritional status for one of ? sampled residents (Resident 41). 2. Speech therapist (ST) recommendation for 1:1 supervision during mealtimes was not communicated via an order to ensure the recommendation based on ST assessment would be implemented for Resident 41's health and safety when the texture of a diet order was modified. [...]
- D Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a nutrition services employee had the appropriate competency and skill set to carry out the function of accurately completing the Dishmachine Temperature Log. The facility failure to have accurate documentation of dish machine temperatures and lack of monitoring of the dishmachine temperature log impeded the facility's ability to identify temperature problems that could have occurred for prompt resolution to ensure the health and safety of residents.
- D Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu as planned when: 1. The SB 6 (Soft, Bite Sized Food) diet was not followed related to the size of meat in accordance with the facility's planned menu, and Diet Manual for SB 6 diet for two of 14 sampled residents (Resident 35 and Resident 3). 2. A regular portion diet was not followed per the planned menu, and diet order, for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 8) when small portions were served by a cook in the main kitchen. This failure had the potential to not meet the resident's nutritional needs per the planned menu as approved by the facility's Registered Dietitian. In addition, not following the correct size of meat for a SB 6 diet had the potential to place resident's at an increased risk of choking.
- D Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its required QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance) Committee (a committee organized by the facility which is responsible for developing and implementing corrective action plans for identified quality deficiencies) members included a credentialed Infection Preventionist [(IP - a staff trained to have oversight of the facility's infection prevention and control program (IPCP)]. This failure had the potential to result in the facility's IPCP not getting implemented effectively which could lead to misinformation, inadequate surveillance and reporting, and spread of healthcare associated infections.
- D Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to designate a credentialed Infection Preventionist [(IP - a staff trained to have oversight of the facility's infection prevention and control program (IPCP)]. This failure had the potential for no coordination of infection control practices, increasing the risk of infections for residents, staff, visitors and others in the facility.
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 1 on January 9, 2026, 5 on January 24, 2025, 4 on July 28, 2023.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- C Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Ensure that personnel concerned with handling of medical gases and cylinders are trained on the risk.
- E Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- C Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- C Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- D Provide emergency officials' contact information.
- D Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.85 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.44 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.29 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.48 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.93 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 19.6% | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.33 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.08 on weekdays and 4.29 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 3.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.46 in April to June 2025 to 4.85 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.85 | 0.44 | 5.08 | 4.29 | 3.2% | 4 of 90 | 48 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.52 | 0.38 | 4.74 | 3.97 | 2.1% | 3 of 92 | 47 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.60 | 0.37 | 4.86 | 3.94 | 1.9% | 2 of 92 | 47 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.46 | 0.41 | 4.70 | 3.87 | 3.1% | 2 of 91 | 47 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.8 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 31.6 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 28.2 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 15.4 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.8 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SOLVANG LUTHERAN HOME, INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solvang Lutheran Home, Inc. | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 10/04/1973 |
| Parker, Christopher | Corporate director | Individual | 08/15/2011 | |
| Cirone, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/27/2024 | |
| Enoch, Verva | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2023 | |
| Fazio, Maria | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/27/2024 | |
| Streegen-Catani, Catherine | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Zlaket, Michael | Corporate officer | Individual | 02/27/2024 | |
| Parker, Christopher | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/15/2011 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on April 10, 2026: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on January 9, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 9, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on January 9, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Lompoc Valley Medical Center Comprehensive Care Ce Lompoc, 17.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Lompoc Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation Center Lompoc, 19.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Buena Vista Care Center Santa Barbara, 21.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Channel Islands Post Acute Santa Barbara, 24.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 22 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Atterdag Care Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Atterdag Care Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Atterdag Care Center get at its last inspection?
- 11 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 9, 2026. The California average is 15.6.
- Has Atterdag Care Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Atterdag Care Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Atterdag Care Center?
- CMS lists 8 owners and managers. Legal business name: SOLVANG LUTHERAN HOME, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.